This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Romania. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Romania|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Romania. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Europe.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Delete: Very PROMO for a music graduate. This isn't a site for your CV. I don't find anything about this individual,
[1] all hits are on this unrelated person.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I am an experienced opera singer from Romania with 10 years experience singing leading roles at opera houses and I have already sung in four opera houses in the country and many projects abroad. What you suggest is that I am something of a 20 years old graduate with no experience, which cancels my whole life work...
The article simply states my achievements as an artist. It is not written in a manner of praising, but of informing the public about my career as an artist, with all the details where I have sung and exactly which roles. I have seen many articles about other romanian opea singers written in a more laudative way. I have just presented my achievements, with links to the website of the opera houses where it clearly states the production, the whole cast, including my name and all the deatils about the productions. I have also provided links to the posters for some performances. I'm not sure why you see it as promo.
If you look at the pages of other romanian opera singers, some of them provided less information than I did and got accepted. I am not sure what I should change to the article to make it right. Perhaps you can give me more adivce.
Perhaps, but those would need to be verified; the subject can write whatever she wants on her personal site, regardless of veracity.
BiruitorulTalk 05:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Here are the links of some very important romanian newspapers, discussing my performances. I don't see why my wiki page would not be eligible.
Why other opera singers are entitled to have a wikipedia page and I am not? What is different about my page? On their pages I see exactly the same informations: studies, career, roles...
Alina.Mezzo (
talk) 09:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It is not a laudative autobiography. It is just facts. I don's see why it should be deleted.
Alina.Mezzo (
talk) 09:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:SPORTCRIT.
JTtheOG (
talk) 17:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Coverage appears to be limited, although there could be a couple of bits in Romanian or Spanish sources that are less easily accessible. No suitable redirect per
WP:ATD.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk) 18:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I could not find any sources to prove that these events took place in the dates mentioned, which would fail
WP:NEVENT.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs) 21:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Cocobb8: the
Romanian Wikipedia page for this article has source(s) by the looks of it. Are those sources sufficient for notability? (I don't know Romanian so not too sure myself). Cheers.
DantheAnimator 00:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is unsourced. I don't see why this topic deserves an article as there are no sources on the Imperium series, only sources on the individual movies.
MKsLifeInANutshell (
talk) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The answer to the nom's implicit question is that
Wikipedia:Notability, right at the top, says that we can merge up articles into a bigger subject. See also
Wikipedia talk:Notability (books)#Should NBOOK cover series or just individual books?, which has almost 150 comments on a closely related subject. See statements like "Where a source contains coverage of one of the books in a series of books, this coverage is deemed to be coverage of the series of books, in addition to being coverage of that book" and "Articles on book series may be created in some cases where there are no series-level sources, drawing on the sourcing of the individual books."
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 04:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
If I'm not wrong I'm pretty sure he's saying that keep is the answer, even though what he's talking about is the Notability for books. MKat your service. 03:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist, last hope for some more participation. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply