This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 24, 2020.
Imperial spy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per above. In Rudyard Kipling's 1901 novel Kim, the protagonist was a spy for the British Empire and his opponents were spies for the Russian Empire.
Narky Blert (
talk)
16:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete this one and quite possibly the one below it, it's really ambiguous as to what it refers to-the Mark Robson novel isn't mentioned anywhere on
his article, and it can mean imperial spies anywhere, real or fictional (or perhaps even on Wikipedia), so it's best as a redlink or with a disambiguator in this case. Regards,
SONIC67818:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Imperial Spy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
위키백과:대문
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Redirect left over from move, as stated in that rationale, LG didn't sponsor the awards this year and so this redirect is wrong and misleading
Joseph2302 (
talk)16:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per Thryduulf, and as stated in the previous RfD (which was closed just yesterday) deletion should be avoided since the article was at this title for 3 years. Absolutely no need for deletion.
CycloneYoristalk!04:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
I hadn't spotted that the previous RfD was so recent (closed less than 24 hours before this one was opened) - I think we're into speedy keep territory here.
Thryduulf (
talk)
11:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
I looked to see if this had been RfDed before, and didn't see that nom. Consider this post my withdrawal of this nomination- can someone put the proper withdrawn tags on it?
Joseph2302 (
talk)15:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
What is thy bidding my master
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete while it’s true Vader said that I don’t see why we need to have this as a redirect if it’s not mentioned. I also noticed that this originally was a redirect to
Palpatine and have verified that the quote isn’t mentioned there either.--
69.157.254.64 (
talk)
20:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Detroit-Hillsdale-&-Indiana Railroad
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete-per above. I-can-see the versions that Thryduulf-provides here-as-plausible, as-well-as them-without commas, but I-don't-think-people would search-with-hyphens-&-commas in the same-title here. Regards,
SONIC67818:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The talk (parenting)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
DabRetarget to DAB page
The Talk. There are two major talks in the US. One is the sex talk most white parents have. The other is the racism talk that black parents have. I kind of don't like assuming that because one has more potential families that makes it primary. We don't actually know how many talks of either kind happen.
—valereee (
talk)
20:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as
cat-like typing. No space between main part and opening parenthesis, space after opening parenthesis, Roman alphabet main part and Nepali qualifier which mean the same thing - what's not to dislike?
Narky Blert (
talk)
18:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Oberhauptling
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as not mentioned and with no particular affinity to the target. The lack of diacritics is not relevant at all, and indeed if this were mentioned at the target it would be a good redirect.
Thryduulf (
talk)
16:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
⦉
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep all. These characters are respectively U+2989 Z NOTATION LEFT BINDING BRACKET, U+298A Z NOTATION RIGHT BINDING BRACKET, U+2A1F Z NOTATION SCHEMA COMPOSITION, U+2A20 Z NOTATION SCHEMA PIPING and U+2A21 Z NOTATION SCHEMA PROJECTION which indicates that the target is correct.
Thryduulf (
talk)
16:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
It helps those who don't know it's a Z notation symbol and it's better than any other target we have. Helping some people is very singificantly better than helping nobody which is what deletion would result in.
Thryduulf (
talk)
17:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep these symbols are more closely connected with
Z notation than anything else.
Bracket#Encoding basically just redirects the reader to
Z notation, these are not general purpose brackets with use outside of Z. Ideally the
Z notation article should be expanded to explain the syntax and symbols used. But this is likely to a complex job as syntax summary for Z runs to four pages and a complete description of the syntax runs to many pages. What might be an idea is to expand
Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-B explaining that these symbols are special to Z-notation. One possible redirect target might actually be to
Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-B.--
Salix alba (
talk):
16:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
3125A: Be careful of your sweeping usage of "everyone" because not everyone enjoys the same life experiences as you did. From the article on the division sign: This usage, though widespread in
Anglophone countries, is neither universal nor recommended. In my experience, division is symbolized with a
slash in the real world so I never see the sign outside of an education setting. Unless taught this sign in an Anglophone primary school, one may almost never come across it and may look very strange when it is encountered—and I'm not sure how else one would look for it if they don't know the name of it. --
Tavix(
talk)12:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
In March 2020,
Red Slash moved the original Obelus article to Division sign, even though that is just one of its descendants. They weren't being entirely unreasonable because at that stage, most of the content was about the division sign. So I let that stand but recreated Obelus as a historical article, giving its original purpose as a manuscript annotation and outlined of its descendants (division,
dagger,
Commercial minus). This redirect looks like collateral damage from those moves and changes. --
John Maynard Friedman (
talk)
23:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as this is the most common usage of a symbol like this in anglophone settings, but hatnotes should be added to similar signs.
Thryduulf (
talk)
16:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Obelus as the broadeset applicable article: it covers both the historical usage and the current Anglophone practice. It's not an ideal target as it also covers other variants, but it's better to redirect to an article that's a little too broad, than to one that's a little too narrow. Hatnoting for such a long descriptive phrase, and one that's barely attested (only 9 hits on google), is out of the question. –
Uanfala (talk)19:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yukariko
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There are multiple fictional characters with this name, none of whom are particularly notable or ubiquitously known only by their given name. A name list article comprised only of fictional characters is not helpful, so a reader would be better served by a redlink. —
Xezbeth (
talk)
08:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Kanchanaganga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
UFN 176
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, as it appears to have been very recently created and it's redirecting to a redirect that doesn't target a section. Looking at the history it appears the nominator created the redirect? —
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 )
05:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Plenty of old links, thus keep per
K4. As an aside, I wish this was solved without renaming redirects as it has been digged into a deep mess judging by the immense amount of weird pageviews and what seems to be loss of history (
[3]). It doesn't qualify for G7 because of this passage: For redirects created as a result of a page move, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages before the move (given this was caused by apparently a substantive instance of sockpuppetery). Please don't rename redirects. — J947[cont]19:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Welsh mountains
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename to List of Nuttall mountains in Wales and split the above named list into two articles would make more sense. It doesn't include Scotland or Northern Ireland and either its the whole of the UK, or split by country -----
SnowdedTALK04:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Retain as Wales is a generally mountainous country and the target section is adequate and relevant. A separate article for consistency with
Scottish mountains (a non-list article) or
Irish mountains (a list article) would have merit and could be usefully included in the current target.
KenBailey (
talk)
07:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as is for now, as the current target appears to be the best general article we have (although per KenBailey) a separate article would be better. I explcitly oppose retargetting to the list of Nuttalls as that is just one of several classification schemes which seems no more or less arbitrary and no more or less prominent than any of the others.
Thryduulf (
talk)
10:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep this thing as is right now, the Nuttall mountains aren't the only mountains in Wales, and this action would be more helpful to readers rather than directing them to a specific range. Regards,
SONIC67818:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
West of the Rhymney
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete; this does not seem to be an alternative name for the target. This was created by
Rhymney, who has two surviving edits: one to create their userpage, and one to create this redirect. The redirect seems to refer to
Rhymney. Search results:
[4]. —
J947 ‡ message ⁓
edits01:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. It almost certainly actually refers to the
Rhymney River, but this is not a logical or traditional boundary river (e.g. the
River Loughor forms the West Wales-South Wales border). The target is especially bad because most of Wales is north of this river and a substantial part is east, including part of the capital Cardiff. Search results only find things that happen to be immediately west of the river (or its valley, or the railway line that runs in the valley) in the same way as e.g. "west of the Tawe" or "west of the Exe".
Thryduulf (
talk)
10:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Globomedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There is an unrelated Spanish company known as Globomedia with articles on eswiki (
es:Globomedia) and others. There's no connection with Grupo Globo in Brazil. Search results exclusively turn up material related to the Spanish media company.
Raymie (
t •
c)
00:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Article-ify - I don't speak Spanish, but given the extensive coverage on the Spanish wiki the Globomedia company seems notable in its own right and should probably have an EN article. Could potentially request a translation of the Spanish article, if anyone is familiar with that process.
BlackholeWA (
talk)
10:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete to encourage article creation, or stubify with a couple of solid citations to hold it in place. It cannot stay as it is, it's badly misleading as to continent, language and ownership.
Narky Blert (
talk)
12:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep I created the redirect as I worked for media company and so was aware of their name change. I have been redundant from that job due to the impact of covid so if you want to delete it, do so, I was just trying to increase wikipedias coverage of media company's in general. I ask only that you get someone actively working in media in the discussion and who speaks Spanish before a decision is made.
Back ache (
talk)
20:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
DOAW
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not even a complete acronym for the series: it's DOAWK or DoaWK, not DOAW. Delete, it's highly unlikely that people would search for this unfinished redirect.
Scrooge200 (
talk)
22:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.