The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 08:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability issues. I searched as best as I could, but mainly found references to other people with the same name and some blog entries. The only claim to fame is showing at the same show as Ansel Adams, and the cite given only states the fact, not that he is the only person to do so, and has no editorial/review aspect to it. The only other link is his website. I know the article is new, but I took the time to search for myself, and the info just doesn't seem to be there to establish that he is notable.
PHARMBOY (
TALK)
23:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Ok, I would agree with this - there is a lack of information on him online, however the ansel adams show presented him as "notable" this may not be the case however
81.187.22.92 ( talk) 13:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted per CSD:G3 as obvious hoax. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Page claims Jayson Cox is among other things an Academy Award nominee, has starred in One Flew over the cuckoo's nest, is a rap artist with a number 1 album in the USA, making his AFL debut at the age of 14 and being a Brownlow Medallist Jonesy ( talk) 23:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. G1. Cirt ( talk) 10:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This auto racing series does not exist. Truck racing is what goes on in Europe. This Super trucks thing is nonsense and there are no resources. Fclass ( talk) 23:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 08:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article has no other source besides one IAF source, which is not neutral, and so cannot be considered a reliable source. It also has no other source in the Egyptian Military. Sherif9282 ( talk) 22:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was tagged for speedy by an IP on invalid grounds. However, the information is unverifiable, and I am bringing it here per WP:CRYSTAL. Delete without prejudice against a later recreation. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 22:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
University technology festival. Is it notable? — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete and redirect to Enchanted (film). Sandstein 17:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Brandy & Mr. Whiskers. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Toy Story characters. Stifle ( talk) 08:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 08:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Samuel J. Howard ( talk) 04:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC) replyLike many other traditional retailers, Disney tried to drive shoppers back and forth between its Web site and physical stores. Late in the season, its online store promoted a $3 discount on a Buzz Lightyear doll for shoppers at its stores. Disney also used the Web to broadcast the final availability of one of the season's hottest toys -- a Jessie the Cowgirl doll. Both dolls are characters in the "Toy Story" films.
The result was redirect to List of VeggieTales characters. There's very little content in the article that passes WP:V and can be merged, but redirects are cheap. Stifle ( talk) 08:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software. A google search returns 8 hits. All (but 1 youtube video) related to wikipedia. Q T C 22:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Taz-Mania. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
delete as non-notable outside fictional universe. Redirect if covered in Taz-Mania. Yobmod ( talk) 15:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Protectobot. Stifle ( talk) 08:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary content. TTN ( talk) 22:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources. Schuym1 ( talk) 22:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I would ask you to hang on for a bit: there are mentions in newspapers like The Guardian, The Observer, The Daily Telegraph, Gay Times, Radio Times etc but I need to find online references to these sources. While this was a minor company it did play an extremely important role in the development of lesbian and gay broadcasting in this era. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapmark ( talk • contribs) 12:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Djsasso ( talk) 14:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary content. TTN ( talk) 22:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of ReBoot characters. Stifle ( talk) 08:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 21:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Article about a fictional X-Men character who seems to have been made up by the author or his friends. Unreferenced. No ghits for "Brandahn Super Star" or the writer "J. Carman Jones", no relevant ghits for "Brandahn ". Fails notability, verifiability and of course WP:MADEUP. andy ( talk) 21:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article is based on the premise of the stated definition of Putinisms but in fact is nothing more than a collection of quotes which are present at Wikiquote, and a mish-mash of mindless trivia; is it actually encyclopaedic that the Lithuanian spelling of Putin is identical to that of the arrowood plant. C'mon, do we place on Kozlodui what that word means in Russian? No, we don't, and we certainly don't try to build an article out of such mindless drivel. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 21:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn — reliable sources have been found to prove the subject's notability. Non-admin closure. Jamie ☆ S93 03:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ORG - for two reasons: local chapters of international organizations are not considered notable, and notability is not established through reference reliable secondary sources that are independant of the subject (the source is primarily sourced to the lodge's website. Blueboar ( talk) 21:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Guest, are you saying that this "Freemasonry in the Thirteen Colonies, by J. Hugo Tatsch Republished by Kessinger Publishing, 1995, ISBN 1564595951, ISBN 9781564595959" is not a reliable source? It is from the page. Are you saying that this " A Sturdy Oak of New England Life, The Granite Monthly, October 1903, Volume XXXV - Number 4" is also not one? You only need one third party reliable source if you want to get technical about it. Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Nomination Withdrawn. The article is indeed now sourced enough to pass WP:ORG. I have to agree with Guest9999... drafting this article in user space (including finding citations) and then moving it to article space would have been a better way to proceed. Blueboar ( talk) 15:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep WP:SNOW. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The article is "Small with no potential for growth", and has no chance of being expanded past a few mentions in magazines. Anything worth keeping could be moved to a page about the community mentioned in the entry, since that seems the main focus of the article. Falken365 ( talk) 21:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) — Falken365 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band that fails WP:MUSIC. The article is incomplete, and has been for months and months, there are no sources given. Having one member who was previously in a notable band does not confer notability to this one. Reyk YO! 20:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Info added 03.10.08 - Hi, Ive just read this deletion notice, but can confirm that as I am aware Aim for the Head are a genuine band, I have watched them many times. I am also informed that they are due for a band meet on Sunday to decide the full line up. I believe that the information you are talking about was added yesterday 02.10.08. You can check out their myspace at www.myspace.com/aimfortheheadmusic. Please keep the page. It will be updated when the line up is confirmed on Sunday 05.10.2008 Cheers.AFTH fan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.62.20 ( talk) 10:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, WP is not for things made up one day. Glass Cobra 21:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Self-admitted AFD. Surely we should be able to speedy stuff like this? Sgroupace ( talk) 20:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
wp:crystalball. Sources say nothing about the song being a single, only about who wrote the song. crystalballing at its worst. PHARMBOY ( TALK) 19:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
CHECKORUP ( talk) 14:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 08:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. The subject of this article has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" ( WP:NOTE), and nor does he pass the professor test (he fails all nine criteria of WP:PROF). Even within the area of fringe radiation research he is hardly notable, except in the echo chamber of groups he is a member of (Green Audit, the LLRC, ECRR, CERRIE, etc and their websites - all affiliated with him). Verbal chat 19:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a list of characters of some sort of online game. The main article was deleted back in 2006, so this certainly doesn't need to exist. TTN ( talk) 19:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Rumoured future album, no release date, no track listing, no reliable source. From WP:MUSIC#Albums: " ...a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article.." That exactly describes this article. Delete. JohnCD ( talk) 19:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Minor characters of Days of our Lives#Melanie Layton. Stifle ( talk) 08:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable new soap opera character; article only consists of overly detailed plot summary. The editor who created the article is unwilling to accept a redirect to a composite list/article of minor characters. — TAnthony Talk 19:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. No assertion of notability. Apparently something made-up in one day. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 19:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Author and expert on ballpoint pens, collector of fountain pens. I can't find any references beyond mentions of his book. Article was written by his son. (incidentally, an admin should delete that user's userpage and block it as {{ Uw-spamublock}}) Pichpich ( talk) 18:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
It's an abstract picture; so says the image. It's the standard wallpaper of Windows Vista; so says the text. Those who know the wallpaper's name know these things already, and the article offers nothing more—not even a reference or external link. I'm not sure there is much more to know. I put a {{ notability}} template there about a month ago, just to be sure (this is my first AfD nomination), but nothing happened; the article has existed since June 2007, anyway. Perhaps a list of wallpapers would be a better place for this.
(Note: I have no idea how to categorise this media- and Internet-related piece of art, so I've left the field blank. Actually, I've used a question mark.) Waltham, The Duke of 18:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 22:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article has little to no context (I personally am not sure what it's about), is very confusing and quite poorly written, and appears to contain large quantities of
original research, especially in the last paragraph. I can't see why it's notable, but I think that's due to the concerns above. Has been speedied once for no context, but is longer now, so I'm nominating it for discussion.
Ale_Jrb
talk
18:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Person is non-notable. Tempodivalse ( talk) 18:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Advert for not yet notable company written up Mat Rudisill, VP of Marketing. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 18:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Advertising pure and simple. By an editor ( Special:Contributions/ALKINGSLEY) with no other edits. AlistairMcMillan ( talk) 18:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 08:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The article is about a software product without any claim to notability, and the sole contributor is the software developer. Twinzor Say hi! - Do I suck or rock? 18:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm sorry if this comes across as rude but I feel I must voice an opinion here, and this has gone on long enough. On several occasions throughout this debate, those supporting the deletion have made arguments which I have successfully counterpointed (Schmidt claimed I was advertising, and later recounted this; Twinzor says that I must provide an external link, I do so and Schmidt calls it invalid), and yet those who are pro-deletion continue to come up with new reasons or simply deny the validity of my proof. I happened to notice that on Twinzor's wikipedia profile ( Wikipedia:Editor_review/Twinzor) someone suggested to him that "If you want to become an admin...try contributing to some XFDs," essentially advising him that if he wants to advance his Wikipedia career, he should pursue deleting articles. I'd hate to think that Wikipedia's users (or at least the ones involved in this argument) are using my article, and others, as mere stepping stones for their personal advancement. Weaseal ( talk) 23:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Stony Brook University. Anyone wanting to merge the content can feel free to do so. Stifle ( talk) 08:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
College mascot, unsourced and no indication of notability given. Also, on the talk page, creater says the page is to "increase pride and awareness" of the mascot, making it a bit spammy as well. TexasAndroid ( talk) 17:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 21:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, no evidence of significant treatment in secondary sources; article created by employee ("co-founder and vice-president"). Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 17:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment prod removed by article creator. Article recreated after speedy deletion. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 18:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Speedy Delete Article is a clear A7 speedy. Recommend salting.
The result was speedy deleted by Stwalkerster (CSD A7). -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 13:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This person is definitely not a musician, he is just a normal guy. He thinks he is famous, but he isn't. He does not produce anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silentocsi ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC) reply
Axone/Robert Lalkovits does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC notability criteria. There seems to be a major language barrier between the article creator & several editors that have tried to help, including myself. It's pretty clear that this is a promotional attempt, but that could be mitigated if we could just get the author to show any evidence of reliable sources with coverage of the subject...I tried myself to locate anything useful; the prior incarnation (admin only) doesn't offer much help, the current Wikipedia entry is remarkably similar to the last.fm bio, and every Google search I try doesn't provide much help. I don't see a major label or notable award, so the lack of coverage means this is an inevitable delete. — Scien tizzle 17:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 21:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. No sources in article or on Google, seems to be a hoax. RJaguar3 | u | t 16:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. whether merging is an option does not require AfD. TravellingCari 21:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable fictional character. No significant coverage in reliable, third party sources. Article primarily plot regurgitation, a little WP:OR, and repeats production information already included in the main article. Fails WP:N, WP:PLOT, WP:WAF. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Transwiki to Wikisource. Stifle ( talk) 08:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This content belongs on Wikisource not on WP, seems to blatant POV pushing. Is there a speedy cat for this? ukexpat ( talk) 16:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 22:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
No references, googling for '"Top Of The Line Electronics" Quitman' (Quitman is the town it is in) only gets 4 hits including WP and a mirror. Question of whether it meets notability for a business. RJFJR ( talk) 15:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 22:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article does not explain where the game has received any substantial coverage from reliable sources. Tagged with this notability concern since February. Prod removed in July with the rationale "It's notable." with no further explaination how. The name "generally" makes checking for sources through a search engine a little tricky, [48] narrows it down a little but the results are largly directory entries, forums and blogs; can't see anything to satisfty WP:N guidelines. Marasmusine ( talk) 15:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. leaning keep. The possible future deletion of articles does not mean the dab is deleted now. Also as nom itself notes, there are other places in the world called St. John's Lodge, who may have articles even when/if the lodges are deleted. TravellingCari 21:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Sent to MfD, which was apparently not the right place, so moved here. Unhelpful/unmaintainable dab page. In Freemasonry (which is what the dab focuses on now), almost every UGLE branch Masonic jurisdiction in the world has a St. John's Lodge or two, none of which have articles (and generally don't meet WP:N except for a few exceptions). Additionally, Google shows plenty of other types of places called "St. John's Lodge" - B&Bs, hotels, sporting lodges, etc. to the tune of 18,000 hits. MSJapan ( talk) 15:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 08:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Forgive me if this is the incorrect forum for this; I couldn't think of where else to bring it. A user recently moved Origen to Origen of Alexandria, and replaced the original page with a disambiguation that's basically a collection of spam links without Wikipedia pages. Origen of Alexandria is by far the primary person people are going to be looking for when they type "Origen", and I don't know how to move the article back without deleting the new disambiguation page at Origen. Ford MF ( talk) 14:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Please refer to Talk:Origen where my move is explained - in case you missed it :) Dampinograaf ( talk) 01:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep as a snowball, original nomination withdrawn. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 14:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Lack of reliable non-primary sources, which causes it to fail
WP:ORG's guideline of However, the text of the article must be supported by independent sources, and avoid primary research. At least one editor of the page has indicated that they believe it is unlikely one will find published works about the Pershing Riflethat may or may not exist (such as ghosts). As noted above, the society has groups established at many universities and colleges across the USA. My guess is that there are many other university associations (such as fraternities and sororities) that have Wiki articles and are also not particularly well documented by printed sources -- should they also be deleted ? Probably not. I also believe this article is a small issue within a greater problem, that being that much information in Wiki was introduced before the use of citations and references were strongly encouraged to indicate from which sourcs which presents a problem with
WP:NOR. If the article can be saved, then great!
Vidkun (
talk) 14:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC) WITHDRAWN article got much needed attention and TLC.--
Vidkun (
talk)
13:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
You said you had investigated the organization for hazing. Is that reason enough to delete them from Wikipedia? Because you disagree with the organization itself instead of the Wikiarticle about them? I say not. Personal agendas have no place here. -- ScreaminEagle ( talk) 16:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 01:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable MMO game that has not even been released yet and has no firm release date. Almost entire article is from promo pieces. Fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. TravellingCari 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of a pharmacist which is not notable because there is nothing to prove notability. Also, there is some POV issues in the article that needs to be addressed. Tavix ( talk) 13:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Not delete.. Whether and where to merge can be sorted out on the article talk page. Stifle ( talk) 08:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Nothing but a dictionary definition that can be mentioned on a parent article. SGGH speak! 13:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 08:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a none notable band with one independent EP-self funded thing, no third party source material bar revies, and a series of seemingly non-notable tours? SGGH speak! 13:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted per prior full discussion, also as a crystal ball style article. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 14:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Recreation of deleted material - we are not a crystal ball. D.M.N. ( talk) 12:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 21:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a case of WP:NOTNEWS. Any takers? Ecoleetage ( talk) 12:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. or nom withdrawn. TravellingCari 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. Article has been enhanced with a further notability claim - that he played in a notable band before they became notable. That might stand up, but I'm unconvinced and the lack of RS doesn't help. I'd love the article to develop into a proper, sourced stub of a notable jack of all trades (films, plays, novels, music) but I'm concerned it's an unsourced stub about a nn master of none.
Dweller (
talk)
12:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Being Portuguese, I don't enjoy recommending the deletion of articles from the mother country. But in the case of this non-notable student art project, I can make an exception. Problems with WP:RS don't help. Ecoleetage ( talk) 12:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
DON'T DELETE from the author of YMYI: Joao Martinho Moura. YMYI Digital Art Project was included in the curated selection of digital art projects at
http://www.processing.org or
http://processing.org/exhibition/curated_page_new.html, from the Aesthetics and Computation Group of MIT Media Lab, next to projects from Digital Artists like Golan Levin or Zachary Lieberman. 3 YMYI academic articles were acepted on 3 international conferences. YMYI is new, and my notability has no interest, I am a researcher, but the project has interest for the scientific/artistic community. YMYI is the result of full research at University of Minho during two years of work. Official site:
http://www.ymyi.org. Please take my words in consideration before salting. added by
Joaomartinhomoura Sorry I don't know very well these tags. October 3, 2008.
The result was redirect to ThunderCats. Cirt ( talk) 01:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 15:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. TravellingCari 20:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Israeli pop song. Probably self promotion. Fails both WP:MUSIC and WP:N. No reliable sources. No sources at all. There is no explanation why this song should have an article. There is an article about the album, so all the info in this page can be moved to the album page.
— Good Wiki User ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. This account appears to have been created exclusively for the deletion of this one article
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 01:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Not yet released book. The title is speculation and in effect it fails a book's equivalent of WP:HAMMER. No reliable secondary sources to show why it doesn't fail WP:CRYSTAL, WP:N or WP:BK. Delete now, recreate when (if) sources become available. PROD already declined. JD554 ( talk) 11:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. with seasoning TravellingCari 05:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Exact same article has been speedied three times prior, and fails WP:BIO. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 11:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 21:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 11:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Hi. You nominated my article Jobs SB Singapore for failing notability criteria or WP:CORP. It was also nominated for advertising. I removed the spammy parts of the article and left out only parts verified by secondary sources.
Wouldn't that not satisfy this criterion in Wikipedia, that you cited?
A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject.
Also on the article's secondary source Human Resources Magazine's not being notable enough, I'd like to point out that it is an Australian based industry focused magazine that covered an event on JobsDB Singapore.( http://www.humanresourcesmagazine.com.au/) I don't know if its being industry focused makes you deem it local and having a small market therefore not notable enough.
I would really appreciate some clarification on this and how JobsDB is a non-notable corporation vs say Standard Chartered which also has articles in Wikipedia . Thanks. User:Sunshine2002 ( Talk) 10:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. all gone. TravellingCari 05:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely unsourced original research. The precedent for deleting such articles as OR, and for pushing a minority POV, as few if any reliable sources have ever published such tables, has been established in previous debates;
Basement12 (T. C) 11:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 05:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 11:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 08:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be mostly defaming the subject organisation, particularly in its original version. Whatever the substance of the issue, this does not appear to be the best title under which to address it - note that there is little info or claim of notability on behalf of the actual subject organisation. Delete Jonathan Oldenbuck ( talk) 11:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable musician and author. I am unable to find any third party coverage that indicates notability with all results coming back to myspace, youtube or talent agents. While I can find that he has had a novel published I can't find any evidence that novel is notable, nor is having a novel published implicit evidence of notability. –– Lid( Talk) 10:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. TravellingCari 04:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I prodded this article as unverifiable because it's unreferenced and there's insufficient information to clearly identify the subject - there seem to be several politicians with this name. The author removed the prod but has made no attempt to fix the problems. andy ( talk) 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 08:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Innaccurate and misleading article - there are zero ghits for the subject and I can't find any other evidence for it. Marri, which is ludicrously out of date (based on the 1911 Britannica), mentions battles between the Marri tribe and British troops in the 1840s and some smaller skirmishes in the 1880s. The article's POV assertion that the Marri stopped "the Anglo influence" is over a century and a half adrift! The article fails WP:VER and WP:POV. Nothing worth stubbing and no point redirecting - it's simply wrong. andy ( talk) 08:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. and relisting for a third time isn't going to bring one. Merging is an editorial discussion, not one for AfD. There is no consensus to delete, anyting else can be handled outside AfD TravellingCari 04:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. or at least no consensus to delete. Decision whether to merge or not does not require an AfD. TravellingCari 20:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The page has been deleted in the past and it has somehow come back, it is also incongruent to the history of Post-punk and Post-hardcore as Art-punk is considered the same thing, it is a term that is rarely used by critics to describe these kinds of music but IT IS NOT A VALID GENRE. Therefore my vote is a Strong Delete or a redirection to Art rock. Please put references that DO REFER art punk as a valid genre, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The-15th ( talk • contribs) 2008/09/21 19:03:32
The-15th ( talk) 23:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The-15th ( talk) 01:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. and not likely to emerge, Merging is an editorial decision, there is no consensus to delete. TravellingCari 04:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 05:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Trying to find any information on this individual to show notability has turned up absolutely nothing. Probably non-notable with the article hype being hyperbole rather than actual notability. –– Lid( Talk) 08:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Djsasso ( talk) 14:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN ( talk) 22:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 20:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to satisfy notability guidelines in a current state, no reliable sources to source it's existance. D.M.N. ( talk) 16:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 06:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organization, currently unsourced. My own search found no references except the local newspaper. Was prodded, prod removed without improvement by the author. Huon ( talk) 14:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
As far as the wiki page, I did update the the references to include Ms. Johnson's book. I sincerely hope I'm posting this note in the right manner! I started the page, and I'd like to see it stay! kelliejojo ( talk) 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply
kelliejojo ( talk) 01:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability isn't inherited. I can't find the sufficient independent coverage that demonstrates the notability of this fork. I'd happily withdraw if independent sources can be shown that demonstrate the notability of this. English Wikipedia and some of the others are without a doubt obviously notable, but not everything we do at the WMF is notable. Before you say Keep or Delete, bear in mind that all of our standards must apply evenly and equally to us at all times, for all content, even if the subject is considered "internal". This isn't a vote--if it's a Keep, please demonstrate it's notability with sources. If it is in main Article space, it must play by the same rules and standards as any and every other topic that has nothing to do with the WMF. We can't give ourselves a free pass--consider that.
Precedent exists for deleting non-notable projects: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaiian Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashubian Wikipedia (2nd nomination). rootology ( C)( T) 06:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 01:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This page doesn't meet the criteria for notability, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable." "Lodro" was the religious name of a Buddhist teacher who has since stopped teaching. He was one of hundreds of teachers in the NKT, and is not notable enough to be in an encyclopedia, especially given the fact that he's gone. Peaceful5 ( talk) 05:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions don't address the relevant guideline, WP:BIO. If the subject is ever covered in some depth by reliable sources, she can have an article. Sandstein 17:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual and internet medium. I originally nominated this article for speedy deletion as lacking notability. The creator asserts notability and a google search in Australia alone reveals 50,000 hits. Many of these seem to be from special interest sites and YouTube, I can't see that the individual in question is notable, nevertheless as an act of good faith, I've withdrawn the speedy nom and brought the matter here to AfD. X MarX the Spot ( talk) 05:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep for now I was created today, how would you know it isn't notable without giving people a few days at least to meet WP:NOTABILITY? —— Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 06:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm the original author of the article. I do appreciate why the article was flagged for speedy deletion, since this would be entirely appropriate if the entry were created for the purposes of self-promotion or to make a non-notable individual seem notable. However, the rapidity with which the issue of Blossom Goodchild's channelled message has generated hits in an increasing number of YouTube videos and websites suggests to me that the phenomenon is notable. One of the best things about Wikipedia is its ability to distribute accurate information quickly. I anticipate that this entry will grow along with the specific phenomenon it describes. As I note above the "event" is already internationally known to a large and growing audience. As a regular Wikipedia user, my first response to encountering the increased media buzz was to ask the question, "Who's Blossom Goodchild"? I think there is a tremendous benefit when a Google search yields a worthwhile Wikipedia entry with links to relevant background information. If the issue remains "hot", users will add additional information. Hoopes ( talk) 13:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I think Hoopes provides a good case for considering Blossom as a cultural phenomenon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sblonder ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
"Cultural phenomenon?" Oh please, this is obviously a means of promotion for a woman associated with the extremely lucrative New Age market. Let's not add to the irrational hysteria by granting her an article in what is supposed to be a respected and informative encyclopaedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.3.42 ( talk) 02:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The fact that the link to her blog takes you directly to ads for a number of her New Age books, renders this article laughable to say the least. I advocate speedy deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.3.42 ( talk) 02:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Point taken, however I see no need for this article to be sustained following October 14th (which, I think most rationally minded individuals agree, will pass without incidence.) Her channeled 'prediction' that extra terrestrials will come to earth on the 14th is the source of her hype, and when it fails miserably, she will lose all interest and notability. Agreed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortonrainey ( talk • contribs) 05:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Well, would you be willing to push that to October 20 or so? How about October 31 Halloween? I think that there are a lot of similarities between BG's channeled message and premonitions of a Marian apparition. The true believers may well experience something that the rest of us don't acknowledge as "real", but that would be a "notable" event, don't you think? It took about a century or so for the fantastic story of Jesus to become gospel. I'm willing to give BG's extraterrestrial spacecraft a couple of weeks. (A Google search on "Blossom Goodchild" right now yields almost 20,000 hits.) For me, a bigger philosophical question is whether the Wikipedia entry itself is a factor is spinning this new "reality". Hoopes ( talk) 05:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Yeah, I'm beginning to enjoy all this hype, it provides an interesting insight into today's culture. I agree that deleting the article may distort clarity as to who Goodchild is, and her predictions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortonrainey ( talk • contribs) 11:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep! the popularity of her utube vidoes alone are a viable indicator of interest and support from the general public. I wanted to know who she was and I came here to Wikipedia to find out; my experience is an example that this entry is valid.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.156.160.150 ( talk) 09:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
A big mural but is it notable outside Pomona? I get a strong feeling that there is an element here of advertising by, or on behalf of, Kevin Stewart-Magee. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 05:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
LouisBrownstone ( talk) 13:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
NOTE: I don't know if I understand the above comment correctly. There are citations from reliable sources in the article. A list of all newspaper articles, books, documentaries about the mural is included along with links to the University library section that has research documents about the mural. There are pages devoted to this mural in the major Southern California Art websites. It is mentioned in other articles in Wikipedia. Some important artists such as Judy Chicago, Judy Baca, Magu, Dextra Frankel, Donald Woodman contributed to this mural.
I took a look at other murals of note in Wikipedia. They have articles yet they don't have as many references, images or information as this mural. Why do people want to delete this article? What should be included in this article to keep it from being deleted?
One note. The article didn't include an image of the third wall which is an homage to muralist Diego Rivera. Can someone post one?
I also think it's "artifact" and not "artefact." Thanks. Hope I did this right. ArtWillSaveTheWorld ( talk) 18:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sher eth 21:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
High school athlete, drafted by MLB, never played pro, now high school coach. Hate to say it because Maglio sounds like a fine person but it dawned on me that I was completely unable to find a meaningful way to categorize the article. He never played pro, never coached on the national level, apparently never sought to be in the spotlight. Local personality but it's impossible to build a meaningful article. Pichpich ( talk) 05:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Close. I'm closing this one also, five days is way too soon to relist after a close. (non-admin closure) treelo radda 11:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was nominated for deletion before and I took part in the discussion saying it should be deleted. The result of that nomination was no consensus. However, I still do not think this article should exist on Wikipedia as marathons are not notable no matter how sourced it is. It would be like having an article called "Power Rangers marathon". Mythdon ( talk) 05:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sher eth 21:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article originally PRODded by me with the comment "Non-notable business person. The "references" do not actually refer specifically to Mr. Worboys at all" The PROD was disputed by the author of the article in an incorrectly formatted AfD with the comment "I'll update the sources so they better reflect 'notableness'... Give me a couple of days." The good faith attempt to create the AfD has been deleted to allow the creation of a correctly formatted page. Mattinbgn\ talk 04:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. no evidence of notability or RS coverage. Sole keep did not address that issue TravellingCari 04:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. No verifiable, third-party sources establishing notability for an upcoming fanmade flash game. In addition, this article fails WP:NOT in many areas, including crystalballery, web hosting, game guide information, and very likely conflict of interest and spamming. Was there anything I didn't mention? MuZemike ( talk) 03:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. /weak keep. Listed for nearly two weeks, six comments and two keeps of some degree. Comments raise valid points. At any rate, no consensus to delete. TravellingCari 04:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
unsourced, unnotable DragonDance ( talk) 01:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Has been relisted three times, a fourth isn't going to bring consensus to do anything. TravellingCari 04:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
this is only one disc of a six disc box set, there is no reason for it to have its own page, and the information here is already listed on The Cult's own wikipage. This page should be deleted. 66.194.98.10 ( talk · contribs) Copied from edit summary when 66.194.98.10 added the AfD tag. ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 14:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I am going to tag this as needing more references and expect to see it back here in the not too distant future if none are added. Stifle ( talk) 08:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Lacks evidence of notability; the only contribution of new editor, most likely coi. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 08:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable city council member. Admin removed speedy because he said that being a member of a small city council is a claim to notability. mboverload @ 05:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Robert Carlyle#Personal life. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Make up artist or assistant on several notable productions ( IMDB page), wife of very notable actor, which was evidently the reason for creating the article. Neither seems to add up to notability for the article's subject. N p holmes ( talk) 09:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This politician may not currently meet the notability guidelines of WP:POLITICIAN. I was unable to find significant press coverage. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 19:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
[unindent] That would be more useful. However, if S.H. is found to be of too little notability, we should not include anything about S.H. on that page: disambiguation pages aren't meant to include bits on nonnotable people or topics. Nyttend ( talk) 00:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I seem to recall seeing lots of disambiguation pages that include references without wiki pages of their own. For example Jimmy includes a groundhog and a song that don't have their own pages. John Smith includes a Utah territorial legislature member, a former mayor of Nashville and a comics writer, all without their own pages. Queerwiki ( talk) 17:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Identity and change. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a wp:neo issue and unverifiable due to the confusion of the article itself. Article has remained unsourced and unedited (excepting bots) since 2006. Still prefer AFD over PROD since it isn't obvious. PHARMBOY ( TALK) 19:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. and not likely for one to emerge with strong reasoning on both sides. TravellingCari 04:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Main reason for deletion: Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines, it doesn't seem to apply as such, then I would definitely suggest it doesn't seem notable, as described by Wikipedia:Notability: " Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability." I'd love to hear other opinions on this. Thanks. Pip ( talk) 05:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. TravellingCari 04:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Blatant Advertisement Editor437 ( talk) 02:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 20:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Recently published book. Reads like spam to me. Sgroupace ( talk) 02:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Motorcycle club. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. This article was split from Motorcycle club without discussion. There is no compelling reason to separate Biker club from Motorcycle club as they a aspects of the same thing. The original article should be cleaned up rather than excessive fragmentation of the subject by splitting. In addition, splitting the article screws up a huge number of links to sub-sections. This article has been restored to Motorcycle club, but the fragment Biker club continues to exist and should be cleaned up by deletion. Proxy User ( talk) 20:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. The article is about a R&B/hip hop artist but does not assert notability per WP:BIO. The only citation is a MySpace page. Enviroboy Talk Cs 01:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Also nominating the articles of the artist's first album and single:
Enviroboy Talk Cs 02:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to My Life as a Teenage Robot. Edit history preserved for use in merging information as deemed fit. Sher eth 21:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 01:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily redirected misspelling.(non-admin closure) Icewedge 01:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I cannot find verification for this "Greek mythology character", absolutely no results outside of Wikipedia. [84] The first version of this page does not inspire confidence in the articles author. [85] Icewedge 01:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. NAC. Schuym1 ( talk) 22:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 01:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. TravellingCari 04:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Café in Paris. A few web references note it as a nice place to have lunch but the notability is really a stretch. There are very few cafés in the heart of Paris that don't have at least one good Sartre/de Beauvoir story and there's little if any room for expanding this article beyond the current stub. Note also that the article does not exist on the French wiki and that does say something about the lack of historical significance of the place. Pichpich ( talk) 20:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Disambig contains link to only one article ( Carbon dioxide), as well as one red link. " CO2" already redirects to Carbon dioxide, therefore this disambig page is not needed. – Dream out loud ( talk) 01:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Arguments to keep are not based in policy/guidelines and do not address the fundamental issue of notability. Sher eth 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This "open source" cartoon character has remarkably few Google hits, and no sources. Prod tag removed. Fee Fi Foe Fum ( talk) 06:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Taken to AfD as result of discussion at Talk:Christopher Rombola. Non-notable athlete (failing WP:ATHLETE)- he was brought in for developmental leagues, and has not advanced beyond those leagues, thus he hasn't participated in a fully professional manner. Additionally he simply doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources to merit inclusion. Also, this had been previously deleted (though in a much smaller version apparently) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rombola (2nd nomination). —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 07:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 ( talk) 00:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I hope I am wrong, but I fear that 2 SPA's working togeather have created this WP:RESUME of a prolific, yet non-Notable author. No award or honor's I can find, nor do I see his books becomming part of the enduring historical record. Even the Pic has problematic issues (but bots will eventually sort that out). Exit2DOS2000• T• C• 11:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
It looks as one more hoax: no proves of the very existence of this person. Andrei Romanenko ( talk) 15:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. Google has 0 hits for "Ivan Kalishnakov". Perhaps there's a spelling error in the article title. Either way there's nothing showing notability Bill ( talk| contribs) 01:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. I agree that it appears to be a hoax. Google has no relevant hits for Ivan Kalishnakov, Ivan Kalishnikov (checked on the chance it was a typo), or "All for Gold", the supposed best known work by this author. Mantisia ( talk) 01:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 20:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Username and article title are very similar, raising questions of COI, no references cited, notability is not established. Terrillja ( talk) 15:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Notability not established. -- Dreamspy ( talk) 19:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. stub with potential to grow. Relisting isn't likely to grow any more consensus. TravellingCari 04:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article does not assert notability. VG ☎ 17:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
original research and plot summary that fails to establish WP:GNG through citations to significant coverage by multiple third-party reliable sources. -- EEMIV ( talk) 20:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sher eth 21:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
This just doesn't seem to be a notable author. I can't find any reviews for his books. The only reference in the article is a website he is involved with. miniluv ( talk) 22:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable game, apparently made-up in one day. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 00:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. COnsensus is this doesn't meet WP:ORG TravellingCari 04:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability appears to be missing with this subject. Does this article have a prayer to stay online? Ecoleetage ( talk) 00:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
An 11-year-old outdated Italian neologism? Hmmmm. I think we have some WP:NEO problems here. Ecoleetage ( talk) 00:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The term is important in Economics, and still in use: see here or here. Jmgonzalez ( talk) 04:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. TravellingCari 04:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Decidedly off-key article on a non-notable band, fails WP:MUSIC. Ecoleetage ( talk) 00:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 04:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Per WP:HAMMER Lego Kontribs TalkM 00:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Casey Jones. TravellingCari 20:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Being a contestant on Dragon's Den (a sort of game show for entrepreneurs) does not confer automatic notability. PhilKnight ( talk) 11:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Are Here (programming block)