This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Hi, I have a (probably pointless) question: which is the most correct format for the asterisk in the 'Season still in progress' tag? I remember that in the past, the tag's code was usually added as <nowiki>*</nowiki> Season still in progress.
, while I have used (in motorcycle racing biographies only) * Season still in progress.
and lately tried {{asterisk}} Season still in progress.
in order not to trigger the
'nowiki added' edit tag unnecessarily. Now it seems that the format has shifted to <sup>*</sup> Season still in progress.
but I don't know if there was any discussion on the matter. I think that the symbol put within the sup markup (*) becomes smaller and less recognisable as an asterisk, but maybe it's only my opinion. Best regards, –
Gpmat (
talk)
15:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Season still in progress.
I have noticed some of them being changed recently to <sup>*</sup> Season still in progress.
, but agree with you that it makes the asterisk smaller and less recognisable. I have seen some of those changes reverted by other editors with an edit summary that "an asterisk doesn't need {{sup}} because it's already a superscript character." I quite like the idea of using {{asterisk}} Season still in progress.
in order not to trigger the 'nowiki added' edit tag unnecessarily. There was
a discussion back in 2016 about the wording of the tag, but I'm not aware of any discussion about the formatting of the asterisk. Regards.
DH85868993 (
talk)
23:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi DH, when a driver currently competes in more than one series, do ou know if there's a way of adapting the 'current series' param to show this. The template doc doesn't seem to indicate the possibilty and some experimentation hasn't been succesful. It can't be that rare an occurrence, I wouldn't have thought. Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 01:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Re [1], it looks like this was more complex than I thought. We seem to have Auto Technisches Spezialzubehör (Q784953) and ATS F1 (Q172162), as well as Category:ATS Wheels Formula One drivers (Q7943229). Can you match the correct dewp article against the article here, please? Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 22:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Excuse me sir/madamn, would it not make sense to also include the World Championship driver stats? Or perhaps that is on a different page?
Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.153.217.126 ( talk) 05:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
en la parte blanco adn dice todavia no llego, esa info esta desactualizada, el resultado es positivo. fuente web diario local art. gps de caseros . saludos — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.166.193.89 ( talk) 13:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chico Landi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerino Gerini.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Gooday. Many years ago I was informed of a local consensus that decided F1 drivers would be exempt, and flags could be displayed; I don't think it was ever pointed to, or whom informed me. Would you (or any tps) be able to assist in locating the archived discussion? Ongoing problems with IPs and new users have prompted this, with one complaining that F1 drivers setting fastest laps at circuit-articles should be allowed. Thanks.-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 13:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Flags are regularly added in motorcycle racing articles, often from far-eastern IPs. The guidelines state that text should accompany flags outside of infoboxes as people can't know them, and I don't see why the far-easterners should assume everyone would recognise the colours and designs. I get these two mixed up , but I know this . I know the saltire , but not . I know and but not . Maybe half a dozen, that's about it. b rgds.
-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 00:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)The article Hall (constructor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rusf10 (
talk)
20:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Turner (constructor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rusf10 (
talk)
01:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Schroeder (constructor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rusf10 (
talk)
04:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Phillips (constructor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rusf10 (
talk)
21:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
The article Sherman (constructor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rusf10 (
talk)
20:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. Royal broil 05:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schroeder (constructor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rusf10 ( talk) 02:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aldo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Near-Mars objects has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
According to this link you showed me /info/en/?search=List_of_Formula_One_Grand_Prix_wins_by_Lewis_Hamilton , it corroborates that Hamilton won 22 races for McLaren and 77 for Mercedes. Exactly as I thought. I don't want to edit war but I would appreciate if you would just undo your revision is all. Emandudeguyperson ( talk) 03:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@ DH85868993 Ahh, for some reason I believed that Lewis joined Mercedes in 2014, not 2013. My apologies. Emandudeguyperson ( talk) 04:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I understand your response to my suggestion that Aston Martin needs its own page and I completely agree with you. However, the Aston Martin page is usually preceded by racing point in search engines which is not the same for other teams ( eg. 'Mercedes Benz in Formula One' is the first wiki article for Mercedes F1, not 'Brawn in F1' as the former team). Therefore I was wondering if there is a way to have this changed?
Alright guys cheers. Thanks for the help. Seanmc 2002 ( talk) 10:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I recognise you as a long time contributor to Formula 1 article on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the Ron Dennis entry. I have removed a section on Ronspeak, it has been there for at least ten years, every time I read the entry on Ron Dennis I am surprised that the section is still there so recently I decided to see what I could do to get it removed. I won't be removing it again since I do not want to get into an edit war. I have added some of my thoughts on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.144.17 ( talk • contribs)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand shogi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Slimy asparagus ( talk) 10:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I guess this is second time I've noticed an edit summary of yours that I've felt the need to comment on.
I feel a little silly now. It was only at the end of this series of edits that I noticed the 'preview page with template' feature below the regular preview button. Then I see your recent edit summary at Template:F1R2021, which is even better maybe. I will certainly use one or both in the future if needed. I can't believe I was trying to fix things blind!
On a related note: I somehow got the impression everyone was in agreement that the British Grand Prix result at Max Verstappen's page should not get the P superscript, because GBR is already bolded, but for Template:F1 Constructors Standings it should have the P superscript for the British GP in light of sprint/pole situation last weekend. In response the this edit, I left a note at Tvx1's talk page while under this assumption. I'm not sure about that now. I'm just trying help get things right. DB1729 ( talk) 02:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DH85868993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hall (constructor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks, yes, I was a bit hasty. Perhaps 'advantage Ferrari' should have been in quotes. - Neils51 ( talk) 09:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DH85868993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Turner (constructor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated Brabham for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
DH85868993,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
SSSB (
talk)
23:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
SSSB ( talk) 23:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi DH, i'm Niccocesa, in the section of the personal records of f1 esport driver some names are written in bold but it is an error, i can't find the reason why they are written in that way. That's why, good evening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niccocesa ( talk • contribs) 16:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm VickKiang. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Celia Pacquola, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that the source you added, Daily Mail, is a deprecated source (see RSP at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Daily_Mail) VickKiang ( talk) 03:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
G'day, I've given the article a bit of a shakedown, and another bloke said it needed a copy-edit. So, I did, and seeing as you have an avid interest in Formula 1 I'd just like you to have a wee look/read at the article to see if it's all good. I'm submitting it for a good article nomination too (my first one), so fingers crossed. Cheers X-750 I've made a mistake, haven't I? 00:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated 1994 San Marino Grand Prix for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I was contemplating what to do with the IP editor addition of a table to Lotus 21 when you edited the table title. You probably realize the results described on the table do not add up to the numbers on 'Points' and 'WCC' columns, because Lotus 18, 24, 25 and 33 contributed points to the total. In my mind, the list of results should always add up to the Points and WCC columns, and if a number includes those earned by other cars than Lotus 21, the number should be excluded from the Lotus 21 article, or the numbers should be reduced to reflect only Lotus 21 results. Is my view weird? Is using the confusing/deceiving numbers in line with what F1 Project handles other articles? If not, what is the proper way to handle it, i.e. exclusion or reduction? Yiba ( talk | contribs) 12:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NHRA (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 20#NHRA (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 10:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Thaks for cleaning up all those categories, I'll pay more attention in future! Halmyre ( talk) 11:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this was one of 'Taki's' back in the day; it was re-directed as non-notable and / or unreferenced and advice left at the re-direct in respect of re-creation. This new version is possibly of a lower standard; a 'sea of blue', ill-placed citations, no infobox or results table(s) and image issues. The original content can still be seen in the page history now that a histmerge has been undertaken and I think I still have the original content in a sandbox. BB was also intending to try to do something with it, as I recall. I think if an F1 proj. member had been involved at AFC or NPP it would have been declined or returned to draft respectively. I am thinking that the re-direct should be restored until it can be properly developed. Cheers, Eagleash ( talk) 10:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC). Courtesy ping @ Davism0703:
Hey DH, regarding this edit here, just wanted to let you know you were right and the removals were indeed accidental. The script is great at formatting the dates, but sadly it sometimes seems to mistake links containing years as links to the years themselves, rather than in that case a season of GP3. I'll keep an eye on it if I deploy it again on another motorsport article, and thanks for restoring the links. Have a good weekend! TylerBurden ( talk) 08:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
in reply to your edit text: I can agree with the idea of George in Goes Forth as a sidekick character like Percy, but the The Third one seems more like third in the series between Richard IV, Queenie and General Melchett. Significantly in Chains, Hugh plays a German Prince Ludwig who kills Queenie and goes on to be German Prince in the Third series - then in Dual and Duality Stephen Fry plays a General (the Duke of W) who kills Prince George and then he goes on to be the General in the Forth series, so clearly there was the beginning of a tradition there. If only Miranda Richardson had been in The Black Seal and been responsible for the mass poisoning at the end, this would all be perfect! But I've always seen The Prince Regent as the new Queenie rather than the new Percy. The Third of the Mad Monarchs. Romomusicfan ( talk) 16:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
This was another page that was 'anti-Taki' mined back in the day. Are we happy for these pages to be re-created (while ignoring the hidden advice) by an editor who appears to be of the same mind as Taki; I.e. create an article for all sorts of lowly cars. This is not the only example; it would probably have trouble passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Eagleash ( talk) 12:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
If safety and pace cars are interchangeable, please rewrite the lead to clarify. Thanks, Dialmayo ( talk) ( Contribs) She/Her. 14:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
I’m a bit confused why you still “updated” the boxes of already completed races to the 2022 edition. That’s pretty useless. It would’ve been better to update them for 2023. T v x1 11:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)