Wentworth Memorial Church is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Wentworth Memorial Church is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
Anglicanism and the
Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
I propose deletion of the entire
Heritage listing section. It is an hopeless duplication of other parts of the article. We do not need to be told eight times that the church "is of State significance". Indeed we do not need to be told at all - the fact that it is in the State Heritage Register tells us that.
The Drover's Wife, please point me to any facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article.
It serves as a useful way of establishing why the building is significant, as it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles. Neither of the other sections go into this in nearly as useful detail.
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
21:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)reply
"As it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles". What exactly do you mean? Please quote me even one article that contains such an horrible duplication and stilted style. I repeat my question: please point me to any specific facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article. —
RHaworth (
talk·contribs)
19:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Literally, hundreds if not thousands of other articles about Australian heritage buildings use exactly the same style. It's part of a multi-state set. The entire discussion of significance is not stated in earlier parts of the article. I'd say that's pretty important.
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
20:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)reply