This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
It's great to see a high quality article on such an obscure vessel - nice work. I have the following comments:
"AG = Amerikansky Golland" - should this also be translated into English?
I've redone that whole bit in conjunction with expanding the background. Might still be kind of rough, let me know.
"Reassembly was not completed until 1919 by the Whites, in the middle of the Russian Civil War," - little bit unclear: how about 'Her reassembly was completed in 1919 by forces aligned with the White Movement during the the Russian Civil War' or similar?
How does it read now.
"a crew capacity of 30." - was this their crew size, or could they accommodate this many people? (I'm not sure if subs WW1-era subs had extra berths for special forces personnel like they normally do these days)
They didn't, that was just be being imprecise.
"of the second batch ordered by the Imperial Russian Navy" - some extra context is needed here (eg, why were Russian subs being built in Canada, and what was the first batch?)
Where the subs actually built in Saint John? The current wording is a bit unclear.
Can it be explicitly stated that this sub didn't enter active service? This is strongly implied.
My sources aren't clear on her activities in White service. I'm fairly certain that she never made an operational patrol, but the Soviet Navy in the Black Sea, such as it was, was pretty inactive and there may simply have not been any real reason for a patrol. Doesn't mean that she didn't do any training after she was completed. Thanks for the review.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk)
17:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Fair enough: there's no reason to expect any detail on this sub's service given the chaotic conditions she was active in. My comments are now all addressed, and I'm pleased to pass this nomination. Regards,
Nick-D (
talk)
10:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)reply
No need to apologise - editors are encouraged to be bold and change things when they feel they are wrong. Gender for ships has been debated many times and opinions differ so we have the current guideline which says don't change it unless you are doing a major rewrite of the article. The GA review back in 2007 was one reviewers opinion and if the editor proposing it for GA proceeded that amendment would likely have been declined
Lyndaship (
talk)
18:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)reply