Russian cruiser Bayan (1900) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 13, 2015. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / Russian & Soviet This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force Russia: Technology & engineering / History / Military Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force. Japan: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:46, July 13, 2024 ( JST, Reiwa 6) ( Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: history watch purge Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

Text and/or other creative content from Japanese cruiser Aso was copied or moved into Russian cruiser Bayan (1900) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I see no reason why we should have separate articles for this ship in Russian and Japanese service when both are fairly short.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 06:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Sure go ahead ( Pindanl ( talk) 21:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)) reply

 Done DoctorKubla ( talk) 08:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian cruiser Bayan (1900)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk · contribs) 20:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

   Watch ENGVAR - see "armoured" and "armored", "harbor", "defenses", etc.

   "After providing naval gunfire support to the Imperial Japanese Army..." - surely she wasn't supporting the IJA in the RJ War?

   I'd pipe the link to Strashnii - it looks out of place compared to the rest of the linked ships

   Got what appears to be a missing link in the first line of the second para in the career section

   Watch your spelling here: "After the death of Vitfeft during the Battle of the Yellow Sea on 10 August, Viren was promoted"

   "She was subsequently trapped" - I'd recommend using the ship's name here

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   What's the difference between Corbett I and II? I only see one entry in the ref section.

   Two volumes.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Where did she go between 1912 and 1914? Laid up?

   Not mentioned other than her refit in '13.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

   Was there any involvement in operations during WWI?

   Other than the one training cruise, none.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This isn't required, but you might want to turn Russian cruiser Bayan into an index page (or at least add a hatnote on this article to the later ship). Parsecboy ( talk) 20:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Good idea. I think that I've caught all the AmEng'isms and otherwise dealt with all of your comments. Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Looks good now - I fixed the "Viren" mentioned above. Parsecboy ( talk) 12:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply