This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Pomoria is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
What are you doing? Read the paper I linked to. If Pomoria corolliformi is recognized as an erroneously erected genus, then why is it necessary separate wiki-artikle about it? Aleksey (
Alnagov (
talk)
21:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC))reply
@
Rugoconites Tenuirugosus: Why did you undo the redirect? Alnagov gave a reason and a published source to justify redirecting Pomoria to Tribrachidium, and to be honest, your saying "You Really Didn't Have To Ruin The fun" doesn't make sense as a justification to undo it. As much as I want it to not be true, either, what with my restoration of Pomoria being one of my favorite pictures, I find it difficult to argue with Alnagov now that I've seen a better picture of the holotype, which really does look like a deformed pair of Tribrachidium.--
Mr Fink (
talk)
01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
See page 283 of "The Rise Of Animals: Evolution And Diversification of the Metazoa"