This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Canberra / Transport Low‑importance Parkes Way is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Australian Roads: Australian Capital Territory Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics: /  Australian Capital Territory This article needs a map. This article has a KML file.

As this tunnel runs approximately east-west, which ones are the 'south bound' lanes? Ajayvius 11:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I would believe that the east-bound lane would be considered "south-bound" by some people, as it's the direction across the lake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben McCarthy ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I have never heard anyone refer to it as such... 124.176.29.88 02:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Neither have I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.57.236 ( talk) 12:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Sounds like someone's personal opinion. Delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben McCarthy ( talk • contribs) 01:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Me neither, but churlish acts of deletion leave a sour taste, as does the pointless attaching of IPs to posts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.207.160 ( talk) 06:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I too have never heard it refered to as the Tic Tac tunnel. -- 124.168.193.113 ( talk) 11:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Neither (I'm canberran since birth), deleting. If a canberran will vouch for it, they may restore it. Phil Ian Manning ( talk) 08:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply