This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: South Australia Low‑importance Matthew Michalewicz is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I dont think this page should be tagged for COL ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.9.10 ( talk • contribs)

I've added back the tag for now. My concern was that this article, SolveIT Software and Zbigniew Michalewicz were all articles that the company or a representative paid to have written. That's not strictly against WP policy, although it is against best practice. However, in those circumstances, having a neutral editor go through the article to check for any problems seems like a good idea. - Bilby ( talk) 13:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Article looks fine to me, Everything is perfectly written. Bilbly why dont you review this article and remove the tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.184.189 ( talk) 11:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Article is perfectly written — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.16.34 ( talk) 07:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC) reply