Manifesto (2015 film) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
"Manifesto has been proudly commissioned by ACMI in partnership with the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Hamburger Bahnhof -
Museum für Gegenwart, Berlin and
Sprengel Museum, Hannover, and
Ruhrtriennale – Festival of the Arts … Our particular thanks are extended to the Verein der Freunde der Nationalgalerie, the Freunde des Sprengel Museum Hannover e.V. and the Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg, as well as to the co-producers, the Burger Collection Hong Kong and the Ruhrtriennale, all of whom generously supported this project. Manifesto was produced in cooperation with the Bayerischer Rundfunk."
[2]
"Manifesto was created in cooperation withBayerischer Rundfunk [BR], supported byMedienboard Berlin-Brandenburg … Production: Julian Rosenfeldt and Schiwago Film GmbH in coproduction with BR, supported by Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg."
[3]
"The project was generously supported by the Verein der Freunde der Nationalgalerie, the Freunde des Sprengel Museum Hannover e.V. and the Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg, as well as by the co-producers, the Burger Collection Hong Kong and the Ruhrtriennale. "Manifesto" was produced in cooperation with the Bayerischer Rundfunk."
[4]
"The exhibition was made possible by the Friends of the National Gallery and a joint production of the
National Gallery in Berlin, together with the Australian Centre for the Moving Image, Melbourne, the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney, and the Sprengel Museum, Hannover."
[5]
"Commissioned by the Australian Centre for the Moving Image … co-producer Bayerischer Rundfunk".
[6]
The question is which of these qualify for inclusion in the infobox or if the parameter should be left blank.
Lapadite (
talk) 17:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The
development section states, "The project was commissioned by the Australian Centre for the Moving Image, in partnership with Art Gallery of New South Wales, Museum für Gegenwart, Sprengel Museum, and Ruhrtriennale Festival of the Arts."
[7].
Vmars22 added
Bayerischer Rundfunk, Ruhr Triennale, Australian Centre for the Moving Image, and Schiwago Film to the infobox.
Lapadite (
talk)
18:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Only because it seems that they are the main commisioners for the project, yet they are production companies, and they are listed as the production companies on IMDB. (although IMDB is not used for citing on here). There is another source, that also mentions them that isn't IMDB.
Vmars22 (
talk)
19:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The Hollywood Reporter and
Baseline both explicitly list production companies. I've found them to be very useful when there's a dispute. Variety is also a good source, though they aren't explicit about labeling stuff. I would probably just ignore anything that's on the IMDb. It's a good starting point for research, but it's too unreliable for anything else.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
21:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I agree. I was using the information listed on IMDB as a starting point to find sources, and what not. I'll look on Variety and Baseline for more information. Thank you :)
Vmars22 (
talk)
21:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
NinjaRobotPirate, the project isn't listed in Baseline, or discussed in Variety or The Hollywood Reporter (beyond a mention of the actress playing different roles and director commentary at a tribute). Above are the sources that discussion production, including the
Australian Centre for the Moving Image (ACMI), which commissioned it. The ACMI source says the project was "commissioned by the Australian Centre for the Moving Image, in partnership with Art Gallery of New South Wales, Museum für Gegenwart, Sprengel Museum, and Ruhrtriennale Festival of the Arts." There are many organizations/companies credited in different forms by these sources; should "in partnership with", "in cooperation with", "supported by", "made possible by" be given the same weight as "commissioned by" and "coproduction with"? Beyond the ACMI's primary involvement, we don't know how much of a role these organizations/companies had in financing - if they all had; some of these are art museums or festivals exhibiting the installation, and "in partnership with" "in cooperation with", "supported by", and whatnot, could be non-financing credit. We don't know if most of these actually contributed to the financing of the film/installation. The only certainty is the ACMI.
Lapadite (
talk)
02:46, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Why was the requested move at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests from 24 October 2017 never mentioned here? Why was that request acted on with undue haste and without further consideration? For a start, the disambiguator is not in line with Wikipedia's MoS. The words "film" and "art installation" ought to be lower case. Secondly, it's a very clumsy disambiguator. There was nothing wrong with the previous name,
Manifesto (2015 film); it may have been an incomplete description, but disambiguators are not used to provide descriptions. If a new name was really required, why not
Manifesto (Rosefeldt)? --
Michael Bednarek (
talk)
05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Manifesto (2015 film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.