A fact from Malus baccata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2011 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that 14-metre (46 ft) tall Siberian crabs are being used in experimental breeding programs? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/April.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Physical geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Us folks in America do not use the metric system. We don't know what 10-14 is when talking about high big the fricking tree gets. Please use Feet or at least put how tall the tree gets in (). Thank you Eurotrash!

-- 68.118.201.68 ( talk) 00:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply

USDA says it's the same plant. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?320215 Riversid ( talk) 01:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply

There is no need to merge these two distinct species:

• Malus rockii Rehder is an accepted name ref. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/rjp-7024
• Malus baccata (L.) Borkh. is an accepted name ref. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/rjp-5766

Makki98 ( talk) 16:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Flora of China is an authoritative reference and it considers the two species to be separate, so please do not merge: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200010914 http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200010898 Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 12:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Agree with that, it is enough to keep it as a separate sp. article. I placed the reference and removed the link to this discussion. Ruff tuff cream puff ( talk) 16:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Wild apples are growing today in European forests! Yahadzija ( talk) 19:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC) reply