This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
"LinkedIn participates in the EU Safe Harbor Privacy Framework and is certified to meet the strict privacy guidelines of the European Union." ... and a bit later it states you cannot remove your profile?? Isn't this a part of EU guidelines?
Are we sure this is not written by LinkedIn?
I made some more changes today to remove a lot of what seemed like marketing material. Hopefully it looks a bit more neutral now. ChrisUK 13:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Still reads like an advert to me. Wjousts ( talk) 20:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Definitely looks like an ad, especially the "Membership" section. 129.110.5.92 ( talk) 18:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Totally agree. Wikipedia entries for products in general these days is all about how good the product is, no balance, no mention of controversial aspects or contentious issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.2.218.132 ( talk) 02:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
List of social networking websites is currently an AfD candidate. You are invited to partake in this discussion. Czj 18:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
This is a very interesting tool but I was surprised to see there is hardly any visualisation tool to show the underlined directed graph. I didn't even find a way to see the path that connect me to a specific indirect contact of mine. Did I miss something? does anyone knows what their future plans about it? thanks ori 00:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Why is this merited? Is it on every social networking site? Every online community? Also, this is completely one-sided. If it's going to be in there at all, it needs to be balanced.
LinkedIn is deceptive. Visitors are urged to join LinkedIn and provide personal information. Only after spending time to set up their "accounts" do they find out that they cannot actually contact any other LinkedIn members without paying for premium membership. This is a sleazy practice when done without prior notification and should be revealed in the Main Article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.100.59.68 ( talk) 06:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
That's BS. I use the site, and that's exactly the way that it is. The OP just didn't know what he was talking about and wanted to have a little whinge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.150.62.35 ( talk) 00:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm Dominic Connor, and if you look at my profile I have more than 10,000 contacts, and have never given LinkedIn one penny, ever. LI do sell all sorts of package that help you grow your network, and the OP clearly has taken their pitch that you might need this at face value.
DominicConnor ( talk) 14:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Image:Linkedin Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
These blogs usefully describe LinkedIn, its services, relevant news, and tips from insiders on how to get the most from LinkedIn's service.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.181.214.127 ( talk • contribs) 09:55, June 18, 2007
Referring to Wikipedia's guidelines for external links - "such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as... amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks)".
LinkedIn may not be appreciated by everyone, but it is useful to many. 65% of business people use it, the average Harvard grad has 48-connections, 11-million users in. The Wikipedia entry for LinkedIn is limited and should be expanded to contain further research made available by serious bloggers. -- I3142p168 22:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
These four blogs are selected specifically because each describes the ways that LinkedIn actually works, what it is and is not, with news, facts and statistics on user participation and system efficacy. All of these seem to be credible, authoritative and of interest to researchers, news publications, and authors, which would seem to make these additions to the Wikipedia article practical.
-- I3142p168 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Aren't references meant to validate existing content, whereas external links expound on what's already available in the article with additional, accurate and relevant information? The content for the LinkedIn article is limited, do you feel that the external links substantiate the content rather than add to it? -- I3142p168 23:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Um... This is a joke, right? If not, please clarify what this means. Otherwise, someone please remove this. -- Roger McCoy 19:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Suppose idea was to change your profile name (like to Mr. None Existant etc), and hence void the privacy concern by making it unconnectable to your real name. Tested the suggested method (works), and changed the sentence to more clear one (also removing the passive 'some have suggested' tone) lav 12:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I have tried for months to get an answer from LinkenIn regarding closing my account. Any ideas? I like the change of name approach. I receive nine or ten emails weekly from people wanting to link up. I'm not interested. Help! Get me out of Linkedin!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.83.94 ( talk) 17:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Recently added link not really within guidelines and should be removed. -- I3142p168 20:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
The discussion of this subject ceased without a conclusion being reached. I will re-add the external links to these blogs if there's no further comment. -- I3142p168 00:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Why is Plaxo listed as a competitor to Linkedin? To the contrary, they are entirely complementary.
link'd in ?
Please review this point before deleting the section again.
The section includes a statement that the LinkedIn service does not provide a way to add/register an additional e-mail address to a master account. The first e-mail address may have 10 contacts, and the second e-mail address may have 5 contacts. They both belong to the same user.
The user may have both a Yahoo account as well as a Hotmail account, for example, and for some reason started two LinkedIn accounts.
First, it is not easy to find the "register additional e-mails" button. (It is down, off the main screen, in a third level menu.)
Secondly, when attempting to add an additional "mature" LinkedIn e-mail address (one that already has existing contacts), LinkedIn responds with A problem has been encountered with this e-mail address, and spits the user back to the registration page, without offering to explain why the problem is happeningor how to fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.106.187.2 ( talk) 22:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Would love to see a Criticism section on this page featuring the never-ceasing "So-and-so has invited you to join LinkedIn" spam with no opportunity to remove yourself from future spam unless you block that particular email address - which they will no doubt change - or set up a rule in your email provider.
74.235.30.246 (
talk)
14:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/web-development/TCH_WDD/7699-9211409
I have to say that the UML diagram in this article is extreme overkill. It adds very little value, is impossible to read, and is of questionable validity. I suggest removal -- perhaps replacement with a simpler version of the diagram. 71.216.39.194 ( talk) 23:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree - I'm not even sure what benefit is offered by showing the database design, as it's nothing unique. -- Lone C ( talk) 20:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Will people please stop removing the $1 billion valuation figure? Pre and post-money valuations, as established by venture capital investments, are the standard way for reporting valuations of venture-financed companies. Like it or not, that's how it is. Deleting them because you think the dot com bubble is too big or the company is overvalued is POV. It's not an attempt to say what the company is intrinsically worth. It's a way to report a transaction. The information is sourced, and more than verifiable - 450+ google news hits worth of verifiability. [2] Thanks, Wikidemo ( talk) 05:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't think any of the new criticisms are sourced well enough, or relevant enough, to include. Some of it seems to be original research or opinion of the writer, pointing out a site feature or limitation and saying it is a "criticism". Other stuff is cited to blogs or commentators, and just isn't very helpful. You can take almost any feature on any major web service, and find some tech blogger who thinks it is the greatest thing and another who thinks it is evil. At a minimum, to find fault one would have to source it to significant reliable coverage in major publications, but even there we generally don't repeat critiques and opinions because we're not set up to be a very reliable guide. It's hard to put in context. For example, limiting the number and speed of acquiring new friends is something nearly every social network is starting to do. Facebook limits invitations to 20 per day and has a 5,000 friend limit, which is unrealistically high if you look at the way real social networks work - anyone with 5,000 "friends" is using the feature in a way other than as intended. If LinkedIn makes a policy change then invariably someone is going to blog about it, but I don't think we can realistically put that in context here in a Wikipedia article. Best to point someone to the blogs if necessary and let them read it in more detail. Wikidemo ( talk) 19:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
For a while now, I've thought that this article is relatively short, compared to the influence of LinkedIn (or the potential for influence). An internet company with a valuation of $1B would seem to be a very hot property. LinkedIn itself seems somewhat of a mystery to me. On the one hand, it is worth $1B, and its user base of 25 million puts it in the top 20 of social networking sites. On the other hand, LinkedIn has only several hundred employees and an Alexa score of 205 (whereas MySpace and FaceBook are in the top 5). I suspect that there is a deeper influence that LinkedIn is having on business and society that is not captured by its Alexa number or its low corporate profile. Something seems to be brewing here that many people are missing. If there are some acceptable sources on this topic, it might be good to add information about this to the article. -- Westwind273 ( talk) 20:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
I own three of the largest groups on LI, and see very little evidence that it has any influence at all, and believe me, I'm looking.
The biggest 'influence' is the way some firms recruit, with internal recruiters pathetically dependent upon LI, but as the largest groups are largely controlled by external recruiters like me, that free lunch is moving out of their grasp. Although it's important to me, since it's my job, I have to ask whether anyone else could possibly care ? DominicConnor ( talk) 14:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
From this discussion it appears that (quoting)
The thread shows it is easy to delete other peoples threads, no countersanctioning is apparent. Clearly it lends itself to easy abuse by using just 2 sockpuppets. The thread (2 pages currently) points out problems affecting more than just one person.
Something to work into the article? --20:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.164.183.79 ( talk)
there is an application for iPod and iPhone. it is necessary to mention. and also there might be found application for other platforms (windows mobile, symbian, etc) http://times.ua/story/9410/ Elsixli ( talk) 04:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Elsixli
I've added the following section but it was removed by another editor claiming it to be minor. Anyone for a second opinion?
"In November, 2009, a bug on linked in allowing every company to "own" other companies [1] was discovered by a minor company who "bought" eBay [2]." -- JoshXF ( talk) 13:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
In the "Restricted access" section, the structure of the second paragraph is such that rather than "not available" it should probably have "now available". (Not knowing the facts, I didn't dare to make the change.) Svato ( talk) 02:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
At the top of the page it quotes 150m users. A bit further down it quotes 161m users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.83.168 ( talk) 11:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
No mention in the article what the site runs on (application/language). Curious, does anyone know? 217.166.94.1 ( talk) 07:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
http://m.linkedin.com/session/new
And I may put the link to http://m.linkedin.com/ in the ext. links section within a few days WhisperToMe ( talk) 06:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
DominicConnor ( talk) 23:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
That's a valid criticism, but I'm interested in how we can do this better ? If LI say they have 100 million members, only they know the truth, indeed even though it was me who updated the figure, I have some reason to be sceptical of it.
Ditto their rules etc, any 3rd party will be in effect saying "LI say their rules are...", which to me doesn't add any real value. DominicConnor ( talk) 15:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree we risk all that and more, ironically my worry about their numbers is based upon original research and thus can't be used, even if I were more confident about it.
So what do we do ? What has been done well with other things like this ?
DominicConnor (
talk)
14:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Major parts of the article are written in a marketing-oriented style, and additions critical of LinkedIn have been deleted on quite contrived grounds. 82.181.241.207 ( talk) 20:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't see that there is enough controversy to warrant it's own discussion. Recently I reverted the addition of controversy because it seemed wishy washy, but also the source didn't seem too reputable. If there are other sources I am willing to be proven wrong here... I just don't see this controversy in my own research. NCSS ( talk) 20:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello again,
Does anyone else think Jeff Weiner, CEO of LinkedIn should have his own page? I have seen him speak and he seems to be a very powerful force in the industry. Thoughts? NCSS ( talk) 21:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Drbb01 ( talk) 06:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)I'm sure additional flaws in style will be obvious to other readers, but two stand out that can use a solid editorial touch. First, it is written in a staccato style, with sentences that do not flow well into each other; almost like bullet points without the bullets. Second, several historical occurrences are written in the present tense. The following excerpt, from "Company Background," reflects both issues:
Drbb01 ( talk) 06:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Groups are the real meeting and networking places on LinkedIn and I’d like to suggest adding additional and updated information on the Groups.
I will just include the information here for the editors here to consider for incorporation.
As of Tuesday, February 25th, 2012, there were 1,212,244 Groups on LinkedIn. Peter Lee, the CEO of
WireWalkersVA, created the largest Group (
Job Openings, Job Leads and Job Connections!) on Memorial Day – May 25th, 2009 - and currently has 700,003 Members.Italic text
Links:
- WireWalkersVA - links to
http://wirewalkersva.com/
- Job Openings, Job Leads and Job Connections! - Links to
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Job-Openings-Job-Leads-Job-1976445?home=&gid=1976445&trk=anet_ug_hm&goback=%2Emyg
Verification of information: - Number of Groups; largest Group; # of members on largest Group; date of start of the largest Group and Owner/Manager of the largest Group can be verified via the LinkedIn interface.
I am Peter Lee (the individual who created the LinkedIn Group described above) and I can assist in any verification of the above. Feel free to email me at pleehome@hotmail.com
--
Plee888 (
talk)
01:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The main ways in which LinkedIn makes money are through various types of ad opportunities and through levels of service. I think this should be added into the text somewhere.
This article talks about advertising and how it works: [3] FactZebra ( talk) 13:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm not a Wikipedia member, so I'm not completely au fait with the editting policy.
The section states that there are 11 million members in Europe, with the Netherlands growing at the fastest rate (outside the US). The UK is quoted as having 4million members, but then later the figure is quoted as 11 million.
Could someone pick this up, and at least tidy the section so it isn't directly contradictory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.70.217 ( talk) 19:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
As per sign up process for a newcomer, it is required to give full email address and its corresponding passwords. This allows LinkedIn to assess the account's address book directly to "suggest" people on the list to be invited to join the network. Needless to say, this level of authority is no different than the account's owner's, thus LinkedIn can log in, read, write, or change whatever with the email account. Only the dumbest of the dumb allows strangers to have the keys to his house, but this is how LinkedIn forces the signer to set up such! Use it at your expense! 124.168.65.95 ( talk) 22:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
I suggest that a section on LinkedIn's "economic graph" project be added to the article, as LinkedIn execs have been quoted as stating that the initiative is a critical element of the company's plans and how they are organizing. Rather than touching the page directly I'm making the suggestion here as I am not NPOV on LinkedIn. I work for an agency that supports LinkedIn's communications team. I've drafted up a shot at suggested language with citations for an additional subsection on the economic graph that could be placed within the "Features" section - below. If anyone who regularly edits the page would be willing to look it over, work with me on any changes to make it best suited to improving the page's value, and then make the update on my behalf, I'd be extremely grateful.
Economic Graph
LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner stated in November 2012 that the company's vision for the next decade is to construct an "economic graph." The company describes the economic graph as a comprehensive digital map of the global economy and the connections therein. (ZDNet) Using open-source data technologies (TC) and a growing collection of member data, LinkedIn's hope is that over time it becomes a graph of every professional, company, job, (BI) skill, and educational institution in the world. (Forbes)
According to Weiner, the initiative's ultimate goal is "to remove as much friction from that graph as possible, to allow human and economic capital to flow where it's most needed." (BI) Over time, the economic graph might be able to identify skills gaps between companies and workers, and help bridge these gaps to reduce unemployment. (CNBC) As an example, Weiner outlined how a growing company might use the economic graph to evaluate workforce skills in a certain area. With this knowledge, the company could then promote resources to foster needed skills in potential future employees. (CNET)
Sources
MaryGaulke ( talk) 18:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Done Jytdog ( talk) 21:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
The linked in mobile app references "linkd.in" web address in the read more section. Is this an official site or partner of linked in? Its unsettling that 10M people have downloaded the app but the documentation does not reference the official site.
Its been a while since I have posted anything, at least I remembered the tildes! Fozforic ( talk) 14:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
It is important to write in such a way that a novice can understand the information. For example: the third paragraph under "Reception" -- after several tries, I have no idea what this paragraph means. It's wordy and jumbled. ProfessorAndro ( talk) 23:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hi all, in the nine months since the "Economic Graph" section was first added to this article the project has developed quite a bit, so I wanted to check in about updating/adding to the section. As mentioned above, I'm making the request here rather than editing myself because I have a COI: I work for a communications agency that represents LinkedIn. Here's what I suggest adding:
I'd be really grateful if someone could take a look at the above and let me know what you think. Happy to provide additional citations/research/information if that would be helpful as well. Thanks so much! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 20:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC); relocated to new section for clarity and added request edit template Mary Gaulke ( talk) 18:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi all, quick request: Would it be possible to update the first paragraph of the article with a more recent user number? Currently it states 259 million as of June 2013. The most current figure, which already appears in the infobox, is 364 million. ( source) Alternatively, the total as of the end of 2014 was 347 million. ( source) I'm not editing directly because (as previously mentioned) I have a conflict of interest: I work for a communications firm that represents LinkedIn. I appreciate any help! Thanks. Mary Gaulke ( talk) 19:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC); adding request edit template Mary Gaulke ( talk) 15:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
I deleted the sentence under dropped features that claimed (with no citation) that you could no longer upload resumes as of 2012. Resumes can still be uploaded by navigating to "Profile" on the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.115.134.36 ( talk) 00:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
It's /ˌliːŋkt.ˈɪn/, or /ˌliŋkt.ˈɪn/ not /ˌlɪŋkt.ˈɪn/, right? The Yar ( talk) 16:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Moving here as this is unsourced. can be restored with reliable sourcing
In January 2016 the number of accounts was 400 million. citation needed The countries with the most LinkedIn users were: citation needed
Country | Accounts (in millions) |
As % of Population | As % of Workforce |
USA | 122 | ||
India | 33 | ||
Brazil | 23 | ||
United Kingdom |
19 | ||
China | 12 | ||
Canada | 11 | ||
France | 10 | ||
Italy | 8 | ||
Mexico | 8 | ||
Australia | 7 | ||
Spain | 7 | ||
Netherlands | 6 |
-- Jytdog ( talk) 22:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on LinkedIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
This section > /info/en/?search=LinkedIn#2011_to_present
contains this sentence > "The acquisition would be an all-cash, debt-financed transaction."
What does this mean? Does this mean there has been no swapping of shares? Where is a source which supports this claim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Da Vinci Nanjing ( talk • contribs) 09:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
No matter the size of your house or company,our experts can create all the custom fencing designs,privacy fence contractors without any doubt at the best price in Lafayette.Austen's Construction and Remodelng is providing all sorts of construction and home Remodeling offerings for more Then 7 Years serving Many towns Like Lafayette, Crowley, Opelousas and surrounding region. Austen’s creation & reworking offers the satisfactory construction and home remodeling businesses in Louisiana. We offer exceptional residential
and industrial construction services with high best, on-time and on finances tasks listening to all of your details. customer delight is what determines our fulfillment, that is why we take a fingers-on approach. while interacting with Austens construction & remodeling, you may note that we're particularly focused at the principles of great workmanship, timely final touch, competitive pricing and integrity in all our enterprise dealings. We integrate knowledge and research with our considerable sensible enjoy to make certain a specialized approach in your venture desires. contact us today for a truthful and accurate estimate of your assignment. We look forward to adding you to our lengthy and growing listing of happy customers.
Our task is to provide an exception purchaser-targeted production provider with the aid of creatively handling the three traditional construction variables of Time, fee, and fine even as simultaneously making sure price for all our stakeholders, and a proactive mindset closer to our company social responsibilities.
Our vision to convert it into one of the pinnacle ten production businesses within the place, by using developing an exemplary production business version that works hand-in-hand with the consumer and their consultant, on the basis of agree with and mutual advantage, in orer to obtain admirable outcomes, now not most effective in mere production, but additionally in the fields of price engineering and construction consultancy.
patron delight is what determines our achievement, which is why we take a arms-on method. when interacting with Austens production & remodeling, you will word that we're specially centered at the ideas of first-class workmanship, well timed of entirety, aggressive pricing and integrity in all our business dealings.
We integrate knowledge and studies with our considerable realistic enjoy to make sure a specialized method for your venture wishes. contact us nowadays for a honest and accurate estimate of your task. We stay up for adding you to our lengthy and growing listing of satisfied customers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austensconstructionllc ( talk • contribs) 10:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The Linkedin profile is an important component of a successful modern person and a prerequisite for the applicant in the job search process, as it indicated here: https://linkedinprofilewritingservice.com/. It is necessary to add a section on the Linkedin resume profile to the article, since this is an important aspect of using Linkedin capabilities.
Hi friends, I'm personally involved in the following issue so I'll just explain the reality and would let you guys decide if it warrants a mention. The crux of what took place can be read here, please be aware that you have links from that article to the entire story originally published in several articles on my LinkedIn account. As was probably advised to LinkedIn by its legal people they have not deleted my articles there because that would put them in greater risk once this story gets headlines.
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to read it. -- Itai leshem ( talk) 00:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LinkedIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LinkedIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Entries in List of colors: G–M contained links to this page.
The entry is :
I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 15:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
LinkedIn's Wiki needs a "Criticisms and controversies" section (similar to Facebook's Wikipedia page [ Wiki]), because currently this Wiki appears to have been written with bias, seeming like a LinkedIn representative wrote most of it.
The main topics to cover would be:
Bright.com was acquired by LinkedIn in 2014. It now offers event rentals, and the company is no longer notable per WP:GNG or WP:CORP, apart from its past job matching business. Any objections to my merging it to a section here? Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 16:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Is it really necessary to have a such a detailed section on "User profile network"? It seems like listing off all of the functionality on LinkedIn is unnecessary, other apps and websites do not need exhaustive lists of features. I think it would be best to cut it down to just features or functionality that sets it apart or has been remarked upon by outside sources. Thoughts? LikeABaller ( talk) 06:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Premium Subscriptions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Premium Subscriptions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've spotted a defunct link in the article's References section. In particular, the 42nd link ("Filtering and Tagging Connections Feature – No Longer Available". LinkedIn Help Pages. February 2, 2017.) seems to be unavailable neither on the web or on archive.org - Rcm183 ( talk) 00:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
আখিব হাসান আল ইমরান একজন বাংলাদেশী গায়ক।তার জন্ম 2004 সালের 26 আগস্ট চট্টগ্রাম জেলার দোহাজারী , দিয়াকুল গ্রামে।তার পিতার নাম প্রিয়মল বড়ুয়া ।মাতার নাম অনুপমা বড়ুয়া ।তিনি এইচএসসি পাস করেন 2024 সালে পাহাড়তলী বিশ্ববিদ্যালয় থেকে ।তার ভালোবাসার প্রেমিকের নাম ছিল আখি আক্তার মণি ।পরিস্থিতির কারণে তাদের সম্পর্ক শেষ হয়ে যায় ।তবে এখনো তাকে খুব ভালোবাসেন তিনি ।আখির জন্ম 2004 সালের 30 জুন ।একই গ্রামে তাদের বসতি ।তিনি দিয়াকুল সানোয়ারা কলেজ থেকে 2024 সালে এইচএসসি পাস করেন ।তার আপুর নাম লাকি আক্তার ।তিনি গাছবাড়িয়া কলেজে পড়াশোনা শেষ করেন ।এখানেই শেষ তার জীবনকাহিনি ।
Akhib Hasan Al Emran is a Bangladeshi singer. He was born on 26 August 2004 in Diakul Village, Dohazari, Chittagong District. His father's name is Priyamal Barua. Mother's name is Anupama Barua. He passed HSC in 2024 from Pahartali University. Her lover's name was Akhi Aktar Moni. Their relationship ends due to circumstances. But he still loves her very much. Akhir was born on 30 June 2004. They live in the same village. He passed HSC in 2024 from Diakul Sanwara College. His aunt's name is Lucky Akhter. He completed his studies at Gachbaria College. This is where his life story ends