This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force ‹ The template below ( WikiProject Russia) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › Russia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ukraine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No RS saying the attack was targeting civilians, and no RS saying Ukraine bears the responsibility. Quite the contrary: Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, June 24, 2024 | Institute for the Study of War (understandingwar.org) The Kremlin information operation linking these two events is nonsensical if only because the civilian casualties in Crimea resulted from Russia's interception of an incoming ATACMS missile rather than a deliberate Ukrainian targeting decision. The Russian MoD acknowledged that a Russian air defense interceptor caused the Ukrainian missile to deviate from its flight path and detonate in Sevastopol.[15] An unspecified US official also told Reuters in a June 24 article that Russian forces were able to intercept the ATACMS missile targeting a Russian missile launcher causing the ATACMS missile to explode and rain down shrapnel on the Sevastopol beach.[16]. ManyAreasExpert ( talk) 09:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Greetings @ Chastizement, you need to address issues raised above before returning the contested template.

Also, removing reliable sources from the article [1] is not OK. ManyAreasExpert ( talk) 19:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Manyareasexpert, this is an isolated demand for rigour. No one said that the template should be used only when the civilians were *targeted*, in the sense of being the planned target of an attack. Most of the time it'd be very hard to definitively prove who was targeted, as it'd require either some kind of leak or an admission by a perpetrator.

The same template is used for dozens of articles about Russian attacks with civilian casualties and most of them have no reliable sources proving that civilians were in fact targeted (e.g., Chasiv Yar missile strike). Alaexis _¿question? 20:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Well I took Event template from Sinking of the Moskva and used it here, what is the reason for the revert [2] ? ManyAreasExpert ( talk) 20:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC) reply