This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Horlivka offensive be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Ukraine may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Should be included as combatants. It’s in the area that they controlled prior to the invasion. Angele201002 ( talk) 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
There are no proofs of an offensive; the claims seems to be a joke a best; you should be more neutral and professional...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:ECAC:93E0:4D3B:CB:21C8:2407 ( talk) 20:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Interfax is an ukrainian source, so....you should stop your propaganda; there was no offensive, Horlivka is under full russian controls, and your pathetic attempt to keep this fake information from being edited show you are nothing more than an POS, but when your friends will be destroyed; your claims will still be false and exposed. You friends lied so much that russian, who are not know to stated fact, look like a full credible source...what a shame... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:ECAC:93E0:6435:BDFA:9BFE:C99A ( talk) 14:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
"Reports have claimed that a part of the city has been captured." What reports? From whom? This is a claim, made by one of the sides in the conflict. This should should be made clear, otherwise it makes it seem like an objective viewpoint, which it certainly is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianbrettcooper ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
There are no horlivka offensive; it a ukrainian lie to hide their defeat in Kherson, in northern luhansk and around mariupol; time to delete this propaganda article.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:ECAC:93E0:6435:BDFA:9BFE:C99A ( talk) 14:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This title isn't the greatest, in my opinion. I think either Donetsk offensive or Battle of Horlivka (2022) is better, with leaning toward Battle of Horlivka, since we can't predict whether this offensive will continue or not. Any opinions? Curbon7 ( talk) 01:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
48° 18′ 0″ N, 38° 3′ 0″ E 24.179.198.180 ( talk) 19:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
At the end of the first paragraph: "Donetsk People's Republic, a pro-Russian separatist quasi-state recognized only by Russia." There is no need to add that kind of biased qualification. Ridanbp ( talk) 23:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. This is the way sources often qualify it.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
00:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Pare che questa offensiva in realtà non ci sia mai stata, ma che sia solo propaganda. In ogni caso, la città è pienamente sotto il controllo dei russi. Quindi, a mio parere, o si elimina la pagina in quanto probabilmente non veritiera, o la si definisce come vittoria russa in quanto la città è sempre stata sotto il loro controllo 151.26.22.111 ( talk) 21:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
This page is only propaganda. The Horlivka offensive doesn't exist really, that page should be eliminated 151.26.22.111 ( talk) 22:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
I agree — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlphaGroupOutHere ( talk • contribs) 16:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
It's been over a week since the claimed offensive, yet beyond the initial claims it's rather evident absolutely nothing has developed here.
Can we address the possibility this "offensive" is yet another case of "Russian warships go fuck yourself"?