![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The charge that Australian natives practiced cannibalism in the usual acceptance of the word – consuming human flesh for nutriment or to strike terror into one's enemies – is now broadly dismissed as a misinterpretation of a custom restricted to funerary rites.[49]
Tim Flannery, in editing Buckley's account, has commented:
When reading about the Bunyip and Pallidurgbarrans, we need to remember that Buckley was a rural Cheshireman who doubtless believed implicitly in the faeries and hobgoblins of his homeland. Likewise, the Aboriginal people who were educating Buckley about their environment made no clear division between myth and material reality..There is not the slightest impression that Buckley is reporting anything but what he sensed was true, yet for the modern reader there is equally little doubt that bunyips and Pallidurgbarrans are mythical beings.'[50]
I suspect that this section of text is politically motivated. Tim Flannery is on the record as acknowledging that cannibalism of one's enemies certainly did exist among the Wathaurong and other aboriginal tribes in the area. I suspect the person who wrote this is attempting to ascribe a different idea to the idea Flannery was attempting to get across. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.231.79 ( talk) 06:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)