This article is written in
Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Ernie Awards is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
A fact from Ernie Awards appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 11,600 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the winner of the Ernie Awards is the person who gets the loudest boos from the audience?
I haven't written a list of winners, because there doesn't seem to be a single document listing them all. Perhaps the book written about the awards may help, but I didn't want to just cobble something together based on newspaper reports.
Andjam (
talk)
12:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Looked at the book via google books (1000 terrible things, not one thousand - searching sometimes has its problems), and it looks like it has a full list at the end.
Andjam (
talk)
12:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
I've got the book - picked it up just the other day in fact. Would you like me to add a list of the winners? (and if so, with or without quotes?)
Rebecca (
talk)
05:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The book also has a full list of nominees and quotes for each year, but I'm a bit concerned about reproducing that - as you'd be reproducing most of the contents of the book, and it may well be copyright violation. A list of those nominated might be alright, but not so useful without the context of what they actually said.
Rebecca (
talk)
11:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
It feels wrong to copy large chunks of text, but I'd guess that there isn't enough creative elements to the portions in question to qualify as a copyright violation.
Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#What_is_copyright? refers to this concept. That being said, I don't know what the situation is like for Australia. I'll ask at the Australian noticeboard.
Andjam (
talk)
11:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
One problem I can say is I'm by no means sure that these were all the nominations: the book is half history of the Ernie Awards, half collection of funny quotes, and considering that some of the actual winners were left out were they were nominated for an action rather than a direct quote, I suspect they've probably been selected from the nominees - in which there would be too many creative elements to use.
Rebecca (
talk)
12:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
I've gone through and listed all the winners, apart from some of last year's winners, which came after the book's publication and which I can't quickly find names for. I've also added quotes for the Gold Ernie winners, and I'll go through and do the others at some point.
It's being made a bit slower because the reasons why a bunch of the people who actually won did so are not recorded in the book - generally the cases when some company won it for bad behaviour rather than some idiot coming out with something stupid. I've been trying to track the reasons down in these cases with limited success, but it means it's taking a lot longer to add.
I'm also really bad with adding tables and formatting these things, so if someone could make that list somewhat less ugly, it'd be much appreciated.
Rebecca (
talk)
12:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply