This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance Electoral district of Morphett is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

According to the words on the electoral boundary map on the SA electoral commission website, Morphett includes only part of Glenelg North. However, the boundaries shown on the map clearly reflect the suburb boundaries as shown in the Adelaide 2009 UBD street directory. In other words, is Glenelg North entirely within this electoral district or isn't it? Which source can be considered the more reliable?-- ~ ~ : Lincoln Cooper : ~ ~ ( talk) 01:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Why would a redistribution be so detailed (and wrong formatting) for a single seat? All seats have redistributions. Just amend the suburbs listed as required. Imagine if we included every seat's redistribution detail after every election... Timeshift ( talk) 16:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply