Elder Place, Fremantle is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
roads and highways in
Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiTown Freopedia.FreopediaWikipedia:FreopediaTemplate:FreopediaFreopedia articles
on the recent deletion of some material
This version of the article includes (with my emphasis):
It runs along what would have been the southern shore of the Swan River in Fremantle Harbour created by the removal of a large promontory into the river in the 1800s.
I don't think it helps the reader to describe the location of the street relative to a location that "would have been" ie does not exist.
... further north inside the harbour area are older goods sheds and Victoria Quay.
So far as I can see, the goods shed and quay are on the other side of the railway line and the other side of a different street - not really relevant to Elder Place.
OK fullstop territory, good faith editing - while an article is in process, could be something that allows for some things to be verified - however if this is the need of the editor, the verifiable and justifcable components of these articles to withstand this level of query, will now be in abeyance, as qualifying with refs and specifics depends on certain references -
WP:NODEADLINES is hereby invoked
JarrahTree13:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
some things to be verified... — I'm not disputing the truth or verifiability of the material I removed, I'm disputing the relevance to the article.
"what would have been the southern shore of the Swan River" - if Elder Place place was actually built on the southern shore, and/or it actually existed along the shore after the promontory was removed, and the shoreline was subsequently moved when the harbour was build, then the article should says so explicitly.
if there is some explicit connection between the older goods sheds and Victoria Quay and Elder Place (other than the former being further north than the railway line), then say so