This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Queensland / Transport Low‑importance Dalby–Cecil Plains Road is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Australian Roads: Queensland Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics: /  Queensland This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly. This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

@ Onel5969: IMHO the {{refimprove}} tag is inappropriate for a small, well-researched article with 12 references. While not a fan of the “scattergun” approach some take with ^{citation needed} tags, they would be of more use in this case. Downsize43 ( talk) 01:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi. I respectfully disagree. My rule of thumb is that if an article only needs one or two citations, then I use the cn, if there are 3 or more needed, and in this case there are at least 9 unreferenced assertions in the article, then the overall more refs tag at the top of the page is appropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Onel5969: I have added a few refs but have no idea what are the 9 you mentioned. Please mark them so I can know what you believe should be addressed. Downsize43 ( talk) 21:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC) reply