Cucuteni–Trypillia culture was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
Recent genetic studies about
Boykos show that the H, T, and J haplogroup frequencies in Boykos appear to be similar to those of the Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture. The regional chronological successor to the Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture group(LBK), the Eneolithic agricultural civilization of Trypillia-Cucuteni, shared its genetic pool with the LBK group (A. G. Nikitin et al., unpublished data, 2009), and so is a higher chance of leaving a genetic footprint in the modern inhabitants because of its more pronounced presence in the area (M. P. Sokhatsky, personal communication, 2008).[1]