Crocodile Dundee is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in
literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The "lol" here is not as in "lol omg wtf pwned", etc. It's the word "loll". Definitions
here and
here. It makes sense for someone to "loll back in his chair"; it is impossible for someone to "laugh back in his chair". -
Joshuapaquin20:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)reply
I've never heard of the term before, so I assumed it just someone writing a bit badly. I would prefer a more common synonym, but whatever's fine. -
Zero1328Talk?06:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Fair use rationale for Image:CrocodileDundee.jpg
Image:CrocodileDundee.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
fair use but there is no
explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the
boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
fair use.
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot23:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)reply
question
"There's a little of him in all of us." What's that supposed to mean?
This cracked me up:
From the plot summary: "Gus intervenes by taking a crescent-shaped, metallic decoration from the limousine and using it as a boomerang".
That "decoration" was the TV antenna. Luxury cars with TVs in them often had antennas like that, meant to be aerodynamic. They have since found ways to make better internal antennas. Calling it a "decoration" was cute, though. Reminds me of archaeologists, upon finding an artifact they don't know the purpose of, declare it "a ritual object."
can we please have a soruce that says Australians are upset about the popularity the movie has brought to Aust because we all live in cities? thats bullshit imo —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
58.160.170.135 (
talk)
11:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)reply
What happened to the lines that go something like, You call that a knife? Now that's a knife! -- It's one the movie is best known for, and I've had reason to link to it sometimes but the quote isn't there now.
Julia Rossi (
talk)
22:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The stars of the film, Paul Hogan and Linda Kozlowski, married in real life, after meeting during the film. Surely that merits mention here?
Cheers!
Geo Swan (
talk)
16:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)reply
"Backing" the subway station crowd
The first time I saw Crocodile Dundee I assumed that the scene of Mick walking across the crowd was meant to parallel what an
Australian Kelpie does with sheep. It's called "backing the sheep". Have a look
here. (There's a pic on the
Australian Kelpie page too.) Trouble is, that page is the only other place I've seen such a possible connection mentioned. Does anyone else reckon that parallel was intended?
HiLo48 (
talk)
06:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)reply
I come from a farming family and that was the first thing I thought of, as did my mum and dad who were also watching it. Mick even gets the idea when someone says "we're jammed in like sheep here".
Halmyre (
talk)
07:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support I'm with anon on this one. Regardless of stylization, official sources don't recognize it
[1][2][3].
WP:TITLEFORMAT is a wiki and can be edited by anyone to include examples, doesn't mean a discussion has been held to determine consensus re those examples. It may just need to get new examples.
Ribbet32 (
talk)
03:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support Oppose, (per 1986 New York Times link listed below)the name of the film contains the quote marks. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
Randy Kryn16:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose, the title is correct and encyclopedic. "Crocodile" is a (well-deserved) nickname, not a given name, and the film's title acknowledges that: it is not for us to change it.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
08:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Again, we're talking about the title of the film and not the name of the character, not what his given name is and certainly not whether the nickname is "well-deserved."
Ribbet32 (
talk)
16:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support move, I disagree for some comments about the nickname thing because the quote marks in the film's title but i'm only agree the official sources of the film without the quote marks are correct and it could be true, well this might change it completely. ONR (talk) 115.134.3.146 (
talk)
09:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I'd guess that the IP cut-and-pasted your comment and then typed in their own message, probably didn't know the formatting code so copied yours.
Randy Kryn10:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. It's a tough question. The first question is, do the quote marks appear generally in articles about people who have nicknames like that? No, they don't. This is why our article is titled
Killer Kowalski and not
"Killer" Kowalski. Inside the article it begins with Walter "Killer" Kowalski..., but that's different; that's not the article title. And all our articles are like that. So we may be assured that if there was a real person named Michael J. "Crocodile" Dundee, we would certainly title his article
Crocodile Dundee and not
"Crocodile" Dundee, just as we do for Kowalski and everyone else. Right?
So that means the quote marks are special typography used by the movie makers to be sporty. But many entities like to use sporty typography and generally we don't cater to that; this is why our article is titled
I Heart Huckabees rather than
I ♥ Huckabees, and so forth. If the movie was titled
₵ro¢odile Dundee we wouldn't use that typography. We don't use a script font for the "Julie Newmar" part of
To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar even though the movie producers do in their materials. And so forth. We might make an exception if the great preponderance of sources use the sporty typography. But User:Ribbet32 points to cases that seem to show that this isn't the case.
So the quote marks are not normal for that name. And they seem not to be used by a clear preponderance of best sources (AFAIK; willing to be educated on that point). So support the move.
Herostratus (
talk)
23:37, 12 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support: Overwhelmingly, scholarly literature related to Australian film and other subjects referring to the films do not use "Crocodile" Dundee but instead use Crocodile Dundee when referencing the films. JSTOR returned 288 hits isolated for Crocodile Dundee and a preliminary search found only one use of
"Crocodile" Dundee in the search results and that was referring to the character, not the film. I think we ought to follow the RS on this one. --
Mike Cline (
talk)
14:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. The deciding guideline here is
WP:COMMONNAME, and in this case, reliable sources typically don't include the quote marks. This can be seen in a simple Google Books search; running through the first 5 or 6 pages, only a minority of sources include them.
[4] There's no pressing policy reason to keep them; in fact the general spirit of
WP:TITLEFORMAT and
MOS:TM is to avoid unnecessary punctuation and style marks.--
Cúchullaint/
c14:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per Gothicfilm.
This website says the title with quotes is the American title and the original Australian title didn't have them. That said, many American sites don't bother with quotes now either, with
Box Office Mojo,
Allmovie and
TCM opting for the unquoted ttile. This is also the case for the
British Film Institute. The unquoted title seems to be the proper title and it enjoys widespread usage so let's just with that.
Betty Logan (
talk)
10:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Crocodile Dundee. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
With the announcement of a fourth film, that will be released this year - shouldn't there be a Crocodile Dundee film series page now? I think it would condense things and allow for readers to find the films in the series in one location. Definitely constructive. Just an idea.--
65.130.193.85 (
talk)
14:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Crocodile Dundee →
Crocodile Dundee (film) – Since no one has made a move regarding this needed adjustment, I will do so now. The reason for the suggested change is that any average reader could be wanting to read about the film series as a whole, or the character and by mistake click on this page. With the added clarification that this page is for the film, the confusion can be avoided!
DisneyMetalhead (
talk)
04:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Imho, this is good as is with the disambig on top. A reader is more likely to look for this film than the titular character alone. --
Zac67 (
talk)
06:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose First film is primary topic - got far higher reviews, made significantly more money at the box office, and is of more general interest than the film series as a whole.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)11:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
I brought this issue up back in February earlier this year. What my comments were then were:
"I think in order to keep the pages separated (Michael Dundee vs this page vs the film series), this page needs to be renamed as Crocodile Dundee (film) or something similar. As is, it could confuse the average reader.--
DisneyMetalhead (
talk) 23:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)"--
DisneyMetalhead (
talk)
04:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
This question is still unanswered, and must of course be answered before the move as proposed could go ahead... or I suppose the closer could just decide unilaterally! But as a move seems unlikely, perhaps it's moot.
Andrewa (
talk)
20:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.