Colin Thiele bibliography is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
This article was nominated for
deletion on September 11, 2006. The result of
the discussion was keep.
Deletion
As I created this page, it's obvious I would oppose its deletion.
My reason for this is that Wikipedia is supposed to be an exhaustive encyclopedia providing information on all topics as detailed as possible. That's supposed to be the mantra of Wikipedia. As the bibliography was deleted from the
Colin Thiele page, I found it necessary to detail the bibliography of the Author, as it's position is essential.
I'm going to remove the deletion but place instead a WP: Australia and note that its content is of importance to Australian literature enthusiasts.
Lincalinca00:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Very well. However, I will now submit the article to
WP:AFD to for wider discussion. There is no precedent in Wikipedia for such an article and I oppose creating one.--
cj |
talk06:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Also, I have removed the importance rating from the {{WP Australia}} tag. I do not agree that this article is of "mid-importance" under the
importance guidelines.