This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Ingush vs. Chechen vs. "Chechen-Ingush ethnographer"
@
Niyskho: This is about your
reverted edits. Do you have the book "Очерки истории и государственного устройства чеченцев с древнейших времен"? Does it say that Akhriev's family originated from the Dzheyrakh society, or that by origin he was Chechen from the
Teip Dishni, or both? —
Alalch E.12:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)reply
I recommend reading the following sources:
1. Дахкильгов Ш. Э. Происхождение ингушских фамилий. (рус.) // Назрань. — ICSP «NEW SCIENCE», 1993.
2.John Frederick Baddeley. The Rugged Flanks of the Caucasus // In 2 Vol. (англ.).. — London: Oxford University Press, 1940.
The Akhriev family has nothing to do with the Dishni family, just the same Dishni are a family with Turkic roots.
Niyskho
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment: This is not a requirement for GA status, just my own suggestion: Per
MOS:SURNAME, After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only. The article consistently refers to Akhriev with his personal name, Chakh, which is something to change if you aim for FA status in the future.
Comment: I would merge the "background" and "childhood" sections into an "early life" section, and probably rename the "early collecting period" section to something like "Ethnography career", as that is clearer to the reader. The "critical reception" and "legacy" sections could be merged as well, and the "works" section moved to the end of the article for ease of reading.
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guidelineY
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose) clock
Comment: In general the sourcing looks alright; I can't read most of it but my spotchecks using machine translation show good text-source integrity. A lot of the sources are Ingushetia-based newspapers, which I'm not confident in the neutrality of; it may be better to replace citations to Serdalo and Ingushetia with more academic citations where possible. There are several citations in the "sources" section that are not actually cited inline in the text: Akhrieva 1968, Dakhkilgov 1975, Dzarakhova 2010, and Yandarov 1968 - these could probably be used to fill out the article a little more, or even put into a "further reading" section.
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style) Y
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Comment: It may lean a little towards eulogizing in the "critical reception" section, but since the quoted people are notable (have Russian articles), their perspectives on Akhriev may be as well. Let me know what you think!
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute Y
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio
@
WikiEditor1234567123 Hi! I've completed my initial review. I'll continue looking over the article in case I notice anything else or have any other suggestions. Thanks for your nomination! sawyer * he/they *
talk06:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello! I've fixed most of the issues. I don't think there's any problem with using Serdalo and Ingushetia newspaper articles as they're not only the most reliable newspaper of Ingushetia, but also those 2 articles are written by Zeinep Dzarakhova, an ethnographer and a
doctor of historical sciences. Regarding Dakhkilgov 1975 and Yandarov 1968, I added these sources because I wanted to make a section about Akhriev's views, but had never the time to do that. What do you think, should I make that section? And thanks for beginning the review! Best regards,
WikiEditor123…10:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Great to know about the newspapers - then I definitely have no issue with the use of those. I think a section about Akhriev's views would be great! It would flesh out the article just a bit more. Great work! :) sawyer * he/they *
talk01:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.