This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Candidates of the 2010 South Australian state election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
LC done too. We need to keep an eye on who's running on a ticket and who's running ungrouped, though, because of SA's rather bizarre LC system.
Frickeg (
talk)
00:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Candidates for the Legislative Council
There are no Labor candidates listed in the Legislative Council yet. I note that Labor SA also aren't listing them on their website. Seems a bit strange.
But my calculations show me that the sitting candidates, at least, who are up for re-election would be:
Bernard Finnigan
Paul Holloway
John Gazzola
Gail Gago
If someone wants to list them on the main page and has a suitable way of doing it, go ahead. Thought I'd just list them here for now as it wouldn't really be a complete (and confirmed) list.
Hi all just had a glance at the ALP website and they seem to have listed their LC ticket now, if someone has a chance might be worth checking out and adding. (
Runger 999 (
talk)
22:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC))reply
No, unfortunately it's just a list of current MLCs (minus
Carmel Zollo, for some reason), and one candidate, with no discrimination between who's up for election and what order they're in. I did exactly the same thing when I first saw it, though.
Frickeg (
talk)
22:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)reply
All done. If by chance i did miss anything please let me know. With regards to the Upper House, do we think we should list all parties and candidates as they will appear on the ticket. Grouped A through to AI?
Runger 999 (
talk)
07:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Only if they have more than one candidate. The other candidates can all go in one section. And they certainly shouldn't be in order of A through AI. We do it roughly by order of significance of the party.
Frickeg (
talk)
22:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Yep. See
here, or
here. Similar to the decision a while ago to have results listed in order of votes received. It's much easier if the Labor and Coalition candidates come first, and then the rest of the parties that hold seats.
Frickeg (
talk)
02:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)reply