This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance Caladenia excelsa is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The photograph shown for this orchid is not that of Caladenia excelsa. Excelsa has white very long tepals & white labellum with dark red tip. 106.69.181.252 ( talk) 16:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC) reply

I think that's probably correct. The lateral sepals of the orchid in the photo are clubbed - those of C. excelsa are not. Perhaps more likely C. busselliana. I will leave the photo here for now - hoping there might be an opinion on its correct title. Gderrin ( talk) 13:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC) reply

The image (now removed) was of Caladenia procera. Gderrin ( talk) 06:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply