This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– There is no question this page is the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by pageviews for the title, with the album getting barely any views. The video game has been more popular since its announcement years ago, and is unlikely to match the album's views for many, many years. In reality, the disambiguation page shouldn't need to exist per
WP:ONEOTHER, but I am listing it in case any quibblers oppose it on those grounds.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
09:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hey
Kurzon, as you can tell from
my contributions, I haven't been particularly active since our blocks! Like I
said previously, I don't see the point in mentioning it. BioShock is a first-person shooter with role-playing elements, Atomic Heart is one. If it should be mentioned, the reception section would be the place for that.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK19:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Well the one thing Atomic Heart has that Bioshock doesn't is dialogue choices, but even then you don't get to role-playing in the traditional sense of the term. In fact I am going to delete any mention of role-playing elements.
Kurzon (
talk)
19:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
As someone coming into the discussion from outside, I think Soetermans is correct here. Reception is the proper place for such a comparison, and putting it in the gameplay section presents as fact what is ultimately a matter of opinion. You may think the game is like Bioshock or you may not think so, which makes definitively claiming it is like Bioshock problematic.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
21:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Agree with Soetermans that it should not be in gameplay in section. Comparison with BioShock can be put in the reception section with proper attribution to the person who made the comparison. Gameplay section should describe how the game actually plays, and "heavily inspired by BioShock" doesn't actually provide me with any information if I am unfamiliar with BioShock. What you have added is also
original research since they are not backed by
reliable sources, and your gameplay section is objectively worse than the previously one. Comparing each gameplay elements to other games is also,
trivial and therefore, not needed at all.
OceanHok (
talk)
06:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Agree with the above. There's a place to mention comparisons or inspirations, and it's not the Gameplay section.
WP:VGLAYOUT actually says to mention inspirations in the Development section, but I could see an argument for Reception as well.
Woodroar (
talk)
14:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply