![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't it be spelled Arrernte? Dougg 07:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I don't know what it means to talk about an Aboriginal 'nation'. I've never heard Arrernte people talk about themselves as a nation. Also, I don't believe the implied claim that Pitjantjatjara has a population of more than 25,000.
I deleted the above from the article as it's incorrect. Dougg 03:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
The languages of Aboriginal people in close proximity to each other traditionally have significant overlap.
Overlap also exists with Luritja, Warlpiri and Pitjantjatjara being 80% identical to Arrernte.
Is this referring to lexicon or grammar or both? Either way, I'm not sure that it's true, or relevant. The main point surely is that: Luritja and Pitjantjatjara are mutually intelligible and are therefore dialects of a single language. Luritja/Pitjantjatjara, Warlpiri and Arrernte however are not mutually intelligible and so are different languages. Dougg 10:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Seems reasonable. Dougg 00:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to improve (or replace) the pronunciation in the lead-in with a version in IPA, preferably for both Arrernte and (Australian) English. From what I've gathered in the article on the Arrernte language, I think the correct pronunciation is /arəɳɖə/. Does anyone know if that is correct? And do Aussies pronounce it somewhere close to /əˈɹʌndə/? That's how this American would say it, at least... — ˈzɪzɨvə ( talk) 03:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
They seem to be known in most places as "Arrernte", even in their native language. The article on their lands is called "Arrernte lands", the article on their language is called "Arrernte language". I propose "Aranda people" be renamed to become uniform with the rest.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Aranda people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)