This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abkhazia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Abkhazia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbkhaziaWikipedia:WikiProject AbkhaziaTemplate:WikiProject AbkhaziaAbkhazia articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Ossetia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OssetiaWikipedia:WikiProject OssetiaTemplate:WikiProject OssetiaOssetia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a
WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with
limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
Both regions are still considered internationally parts of the Republic of Georgia, and Gerogia considers the regions under the Russian occupation. the article completely bypasses such facts. This needs to be fixed.--
Termer (
talk)
04:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Just because Georgia considers these two nations to be part of their territory doesn't mean Abkhazia and South Ossetia can't have diplomatic relations with each other, which is the point of this article. --
Tocino21:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
It's well known fact that "these two nations" have been only recognized by Russia and Nicaragua. therefore the two provinces of an internationally recognized sovereign country like Georgia may have an article about their "diplomatic relations with each other" on Wikipedia as long as ...see ma previous post.--
Termer (
talk)
05:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
They are recognized by Russia, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (and, soon, Ecuador); as well, Turkey and Lebanon have some political relations with them by way of exchanging delegations, things like that. They are completely independent of Georgia, i.e. their governments are in full control of the territories they claim, while Georgians cannot even enter either of the two Republics. And you want me to consider them a part of Georgia? When their border with Georgia are closed? You, my friend, are delusional, and in denial. And the article is very nice exactly as it is.--
SergeiXXX (
talk)
16:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
But what is your point? Yes, South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not recognised by the majority of the world's states, but what does this have to do with their diplomatic relations?
sephia karta |
di mi13:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC)reply
The article needs to be written according to secondary reliable sources not only according to the Russian news agency. Which doesn't mean that RIA Novosti shouldn't be used, etc., that's fine as long as all other major alternative viwepoints are present in the article that are currently missing. Including the fact that 2 major world powers, the USA and EU still consider those regions as 2 provices of Georgia etc. Listing all relevant viewpoints in the article, that's what
WP:NPOV is all about.--
Termer (
talk)
05:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is
non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
I have just modified 3 external links on
AbkhaziaâSouth Ossetia relations. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.