![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Specialized archives: Pre season, November, December, January, February, March, April |
Other basin talkpages | 2010:
Atlantic -
W. Pacific -
Central and East Pacific -
N. Indian -
S. Hemisphere
2010-11: S. Hemisphere - SW. Indian - Australian - S. Pacific 2011: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East. Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
ID | Date (ACST) | TC Name | TCWC | Original Basin | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01U | 2010-10-28 | Anggrek | P/J | Indian Ocean | TCR |
02U | 2010-12-04 | Abele | *R/P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
03U | 2010-12-15 | - | P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
04U | 2010-12-22 | - | P | Indian Ocean | |
05U | 2010-12-24 | Tasha | B | Coral Sea | BT Database |
06U | 2010-12-30 | - | P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
07U | |||||
08U | |||||
09U | 2011-01-11 | Vince | P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
10U | 2011-01-13 | Zelia | B | Coral Sea | BT Database |
11U | 2011-01-23 | Anthony | B | Coral Sea | BT Database |
12U | 2011-01-23 | Bianca | D/P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
13U | 2011-01-31 | - | P | Indian Ocean | Tech Bull |
14U | 2011-01-31 | Yasi | *F/B | Coral Sea | BT Database |
15U | 2011-02-11 | - | P | Indian Ocean | Tech Bull |
16U | 2011-02-15 | Dianne | P | Indian Ocean | BT Database |
17U | 2011-02-15 | Carlos | D/P | NW, W Australia | BT Database |
18U | 2011-02-25 | - | P | W Australia | Tech Bull |
19U | 2011-02-26 | - | D | G.O.C | Tech Bull |
20U | 2011-03-01 | - | D | N Australia | Tech Bull |
21U | 2011-03-07 | *12F | B | Coral Sea | Adv |
22U | 2011-03-11 | - | D/P | NW Australia | TWO |
23U | 2011-03-11 | *Cherono | P | Indian Ocean | *same ref 22U ^ |
24U | 2011-03-22 | *Bune | N/W | *SPac | SAB |
25U | 2011-03-29 | - | D/P | NW Australia | TCR |
26U | 2011-03-30 | - | P | Indian Ocean | Tech Bull |
27U | 2011-03-30 | - | *R/P | Indian Ocean | *same ref 26U ^ |
28U | 2011-04-15 | - | B | Coral Sea | Analysis |
29U | 2011-04-14 | Errol | D/P | Arafura | BT Database |
The TCWC AORs have/are changing according to page 91 of this report RA V have accepted the changes. According this separate report, The new AORs are
I havent updated any articles yet as i am not sure whether these are coming in with immediate effect or not. I guess we will find out within the next couple of weeks. Jason Rees ( talk) 19:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
IMO the intensity in the infobox for Abele is given wrongly, probably due to messing up 10 min speeds and 3 sec gusts. I only could not figure out wether we should take the last MF Reunion advisory which already gives coordinates within the Australia AOR or should we stick on the first BoM advisory from Perth. According to the archived advisories Abeles intensity was:
Time | 0000 UTC 03/12/2010 | 0735 UTC 03/12/2010 | 1240 UTC 03/12/2010 | 1847 UTC 03/12/2010 | 0122 UTC 04/12/2010 |
TCWC | Reunion | Perth | Perth | Perth | Perth |
10 min winds (kn) | 50 | 45 | 40 | 40 | 30 |
3 sec gusts (kn) | – | 65 | 55 | 50 | 45 |
pressure (hPa) | 987 | 990 | 992 | 997 | 1000 |
I am inclined to take the last RSMC Reunion intensity since the storm was already east of 90° E, what is in the Australian region, so 50 kn and 98 hPa. -- Matthiasb ( talk) 18:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Need date for when 04U dissipated for the editing of the timeline. Rosalina2427 ( talk) 19:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone know where the figures are taken from? The official website seems to haven't been updated sind last July so it can be doubted if those figures in the article are correct. Any information? -- Matthiasb ( talk) 18:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I received an email from the BoM regarding the missing U's.
01U - Anggrek - Perth - 27/10/2010
02U - Abele - Perth - 29/11/2010
03U - N/A - Perth - 10/12/2010 (location system was identified: 12S; 107E)
04U - N/A - Perth - 22/12/2010 (location system was identified: 12S; 130E)
05U - Tasha - Brisbane - 24/12/2010
06U - N/A - Perth - 29/12/2010 (location system was identified: 15S; 125E)
07U - N/A - Perth - 29/12/2010 (location system was identified: 12S; 95E)
08U - N/A - Perth - 31/12/2010 (location system was identified: 12S; 109E)
09U - Vince - Perth - 10/01/2011
10U - Zelia - Brisbane - 13/01/2011
Still not sure if this is enough to update the article, so I'll leave it be and see if anyone else wants to. Cyclonica ( talk) 13:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Its enough to update the article with. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Yeah I had a feeling an email wouldn't be enough. Just have to wait to have it verified some other way. Another note: A Tropical Low near the NT/WA border has a Severe Weather Warning, it's likely this is already 11U, but again, must wait until a tech summary is issued. Cyclonica ( talk) 16:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I have made some tentative identifications and recovered the track files: any comments?-- Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
03U = 91S.INVEST [1]
00005 12/14/2010 M= 7 0 SNBR=0000 91S XING=0 00010 12/14L1701115 20 1007L1741111 20 1007L1771108 20 1007*1791103 25 1004* 00015 12/15*1821098 30 1000*1851095 30 1000*1891095 30 1000*1961097 30 1000* 00020 12/16*2011099 30 1000*2051100 25 1001*2101104 25 1004*2131107 25 1004* 00025 12/17*2161116 25 1004*2181125 25 1004*2221129 25 1004*2261131 25 1004* 00030 12/18*2281135 25 1004*2301139 25 1004*2361140 25 1004*2471137 25 1004* 00035 12/19*2531129 25 1004*2581124 25 1004*2661123 25 1004*2821115 25 1004* 00040 12/20*2901101 25 1004* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 00045 TD
00005 12/22/2010 M= 3 0 SNBR=0000 95S XING=0 00010 12/22* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0L1181277 15 1010* 00015 12/23L1201270 15 1010L1211265 15 1010L1211257 15 1010L1221253 15 1010* 00020 12/24L1251247 15 1010* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 00025 TD
1 I read "101222 1200" in the second file as meaning "101223 1200"
07U = 97S.INVEST = Tropical Depression 03R = File:03R 2010 track.png
08U = 99S.INVEST [4]
00005 12/30/2010 M= 4 0 SNBR=0000 99S XING=0 00010 12/30L 971064 15 1010L1011071 15 1010L1061077 15 1010L1121084 15 1010* 00015 12/31L1191089 15 1010L1261094 20 1007*1311097 25 1004*1351099 25 1001* 00020 01/01*1391101 25 1001*1351090 25 1004*1281091 25 1004*1331103 25 1004* 00025 01/02*1401116 25 1002*1581132 25 1004*1831135 25 1004*2111127 25 1004* 00030 TD
There has been a lot of trouble with Tropical Cyclone Anthony. A break is required in the 'Timeline of recent events' image. Why? Because the system weakened into a low and we dont even know if it further weakened as the BoM stopped issuing advisories. In all other basins it happens like that. When a system weakens into a low, the RSMCs strom issuing advisories, if the continue their advisories after a couple of days, then we put a break in the template, (because the rsmc was not issuing any advisories). Some users today are ignoring the break as they think the system remained a low all the time. What should be done,
-- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 09:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
There has been persistent vandalism. Bianca section has been completely destroyed. Immediate action must be taken. -- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 05:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The articles says:
However in the given source ref we read:
It is not clear from that source (we will wait at least for the monthly weather review to find out) wether the low was associated with the monsoon trough but definitely it is not said that the low formed in the GoC, it is only said that early on 21 Jan it was located over land near Kununurra. I will change this tomorrow or the day after tomorrow if nobody will object or come up with a better source. -- Matthiasb ( talk) 23:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Can we knab the last couple of days worth of TWOs from Perth and stick them on the SWIO page. I ask as i would be prepared to bet that 13U (The missing system) is the system mentioned within the TWO's. Jason Rees ( talk) 13:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Well this isn't a typical season with all the floods in SA, VIC and S NSW, it is looking like Anthony and Yasi assisted (with tropical moisture feeding into a trough). This is going to be rather complex to work out or how to work out what system caused the most influence but it is likely Anthony added moisture and Yasi maintained it, one it had moved down to S NT. This is only going by IR, VIS and WV images, so we may have to wait for a report(s) to be published by the BoM. Also over the weekend there was another flood related death for the year and the first for this event (in S Aus). Bidgee ( talk) 02:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Info about 15U has been deleted from these talk pages but this system has been inactive for a few days. Can someone cleanup the info on the main page as to when it finally becme inactive? Thx. Brudder Andrusha ( talk)
There is a discussion going on about the names of cyclone articles, whether it should be at the official name, or the more commonly used name. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones#Article names. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Name Tropical Low 22U and 23U on the timeline and the season effects. And the season effects. And update everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.35.232.141 ( talk • contribs) -- Matthiasb ( talk) 07:47, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Just to inform more prominent than in the edit comment: I changed the 24U part in the point where it was said that it got extratropical north-west of NZL. From the track map it seems to be messed up with the north-east. Still that might need verification. Since that mixing up east and west did happen some weeks ago with another cyclone what I also caught up but don't remember I am wondering if an editor with maternal language French is the source of those mistakes, possibly messing up est and ouest vs. east and west.
Also, considering the more recent TWOs issued by Perth, Darwin, and Brisbane and the use of the U-identifier by Perth in its TWOs it seems very certain to me that the missing Us have appeared rather in the Brisbane AOR. Considering what they've done with 24U, I think it is well possible that the missing Us refer to some systems in the Nadi AOR of which Brisbane operationally thought at the time they might have an impact on the Australian region. -- Matthiasb ( talk) 07:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm also confused about the point that TCWC Brisbane numbered a low east of 180 as 24U. It seems that it is more likely to be referred as a low formed in Darwin AOR at around 19/3-21/3. Also, according to the previous cases, I think that the TCWCs are not likely to number any systems that are not mentioned in TWOs. Raymond765 ( talk) 03:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Errol hasn't really been updated recently. The last advisory was issued by BoM, and the UNISYS track map is here, but ours hasn't been updated yet. Not to be impatient, but could anyone update it to match the one I mentioned? Rye998 ( talk) 15:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
The BoM's Excel Spreadsheet BT has recently downgraded Anggrek to a tropical low because gales never extended more than halfway around the system centre. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 65 external links on 2010–11 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)