Gnathiferans include some of the most abundant phyla. Rotifers are among the most diverse and abundant freshwater animals and chaetognaths are among the most abundant marine plankton.[4][5]
Description
The most distinctive characteristic of gnathiferans is the presence of complex sclerotized mouthparts made of chitin.[1]
In most gnathiferans, the anus opens on the dorsal surface of the animal.[6][7][8] In micrognathozoans and gnathostomulids, the anus is transient and only forms during defecation.[7][8] Unlike other gnathiferans, in chaetognaths and the extinct Amiskwia the anus is located on the ventral surface in a subterminal position.[9][10]
Both Gnathostomulida and Micrognathozoa are
acoelomates, rotifers are
pseudocoelomates, and chaetognathans have a true
coelom. Gnathostomulidans and chaetognathans are
hermaphrodites, and Micrognathozoa appears to be
parthenogenetic as no males have ever been observed, but it has been suggested undiscovered dwarf males could be responsible for fertilization. In rotifers both males and females occurs, except from the class
Bdelloidea.[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]
Development
All known gnathiferans are
direct developers.[18] Though gnathiferans are included in Spiralia, rotifers and chaetognaths do not exhibit spiral
cleavage.[18][1] Little is known of the development of micrognathozoans.[18] The development of gnathostomulids is poorly known, but they appear to exhibit spiral cleavage.[18][1]
Summary of relationships of gnathiferans in recent studies, with disputed relationships represented as polytomies[1][6][19][20][21]
Gnathifera is a member of Spiralia. It is the sister taxon of a clade comprising all other spiralians.[1][20] Before the cladistic era, most gnathiferans were regarded as
aschelminths, a grouping now recognized as
polyphyletic.
Chaetognaths exhibit numerous morphological similarities to rotifers, suggesting that they may be sister taxa.[6][19] However, based on molecular data, micrognathozoans may be more closely related to rotifers than chaetognaths.[1]
Rotifera comprises four subclades:
Seisonida,
Acanthocephala,
Bdelloidea, and
Monogononta. Acanthocephalans were traditionally excluded from Rotifera, but it is now known that rotifers are paraphyletic without including acanthocephalans. Some taxonomists call the clade of rotifers including acanthocephalans Syndermata, but others continue to use Rotifera and regard acanthocephalans as rotifers.[20] Numerous hypotheses of rotifer interrelationships exist.[20][21]
The enigmatic phylum
Cycliophora may belong to Gnathifera, but other studies suggest that it is more closely related to the
Entoprocta.[3]
Fossil record
The fossil record of gnathiferans is poor. There are no known fossil gnathostomulids.[22] Fossils of the extant rotifer genus Habrotrocha are known from
Dominican amber dating to the late
Eocene, but rotifers are otherwise only known from the
Holocene.[23][24] By contrast, the chaetognath fossil record, while still patchy, includes numerous
Paleozoic specimens.[25]Protoconodonts are stem-group chaetognaths.[26] The earliest protoconodonts date to the
Fortunian age of the
Cambrian, and are among the oldest known bilaterians.[27] The enigmatic Cambrian taxon Amiskwia is a gnathiferan and may also be a stem-group chaetognath.[6][9] The Cambrian ectoparasite Inquicus appears to be a gnathiferan.[6]
History
Gnathifera was named in 1995 to unite gnathostomulids and rotifers. Micrognathozoans were soon added to this grouping. Chaetognaths, long considered a distinct lineage with no close relatives, were identified as gnathiferans in 2019.[1]
A similar grouping, Acanthognatha, was suggested in 1998 to unite
gastrotrichs with gnathostomulids and rotifers.[28] However, gastrotrichs are more closely related to lophotrochozoans than gnathiferans.[20][1]
^
abcdHejnol, Andreas (2015). "Gnathifera". In Wanninger, A. (ed.). Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Invertebrates 2: Lophotrochozoa (Spiralia). Springer. pp. 1–12.
doi:
10.1007/978-3-7091-1871-9_1.
ISBN978-3-7091-1870-2.
^
abSielaff, Malte; Schmidt, Hanno; Struck, Torsten H.; Rosenkranz, David; Mark Welch, David B.; Hankeln, Thomas; Herlyn, Holger (2016). "Phylogeny of Syndermata (syn. Rotifera): Mitochondrial gene order verifies epizoic Seisonidea as sister to endoparasitic Acanthocephala within monophyletic Hemirotifera". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 96: 79–92.
Bibcode:
2016MolPE..96...79S.
doi:
10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.017.
PMID26702959.
^Piper, Ross (2013). Animal Earth: The Amazing Diversity of Living Creatures. Thames & Hudson.
^Poinar, G. O.; Ricci, C. (1992). "Bdelloid rotifers in Dominican amber: evidence for parthenogenetic continuity". Experientia. 48 (4): 408–410.
doi:
10.1007/bf01923444.
S2CID13098228.
^Waggoner, B. M.; Poinar, G. O. (1993). "Fossil habrotrochid rotifers in Dominican amber". Experientia. 49 (4): 354–357.
doi:
10.1007/bf01923421.
S2CID28087284.