This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I just brought up some issues about the Final Fantasy X-2 article on the talk page, and how it needs some good maintenance. I figured the best place to come to would be you guys. Anyone feel courageous enough to revamp a featured article promoted back in 2006? Famous Hobo ( talk) 05:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Hey guys, I've been jammin on FFXIV: Heavensward for 8 months now and it's finally ready. I wouldn't normally do this, but I'd really appreciate a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward. I know I just put it up but I'm hoping to catch the 3rd anniversary of FF14's release (8/27) so it's a bit time sensitive. I'm willing to QPQ anything you like in exchange. :) Also, if there's an admin in the house, I'm still waiting on a housekeeping move at Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward. Axem Titanium ( talk) 21:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
After making my first FA (from other project) I was wondering whether it was possible to bring Tidus to Featured Article status based on how it appears there is more out of universe than in-universe info. What should I ask for first, a peer review or a copyedit? Anybody could also help me? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Update. A copyeditor already finished editing the article while closed the peer review since even one commented did in my talk page. Do you guys think it's worth for FA material? I'm not entirely sure so I need answer or maybe a conominator. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 21:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Another update It appears the nomination is going quite well. Could someone make a source review? Praise be to-- I mean regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 21:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Another update A user already made the source review. Does the FAC need more attention or everything is going on well? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
There is an important discussion regarding the possibility of making Final Fantasy XV a GA or an FA in the future. The discussion can be found at Talk:Final Fantasy XV#Possible GA/FA?. Input or suggestions from project members would be appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 03:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The logo used for Star Ocean: The Last Hope is used. However, later games use the different logo again, which was used for a few games prior to Last Hope. I found images of the logo. Does anyone have a photoshop application to create the logo without using backgrounds and subtitles? George Ho ( talk) 19:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Incredible milestone approaching, thought I'd mention it. Also, smallest number of cleanup tags and articles we have ever recorded. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The last Top level Importance articles with cleanup tags
Then the last B class articles with cleanup tags
Have at it!
Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 21:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The FFD discussion has been ongoing for several months without closure. Though the games belong to Namco or Bandai Namco, I figure that you can treat the issue the same as the one with Final Fantasy games. I invite you to improve consensus there. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings WikiProject Square Enix/archive/17 Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Please chime in! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 18:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
We would like to wish everyone on the project a very happy holiday season! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 03:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm wondering as, given that a huge new article has appeared on Polygon and it's the titles twentieth anniversary, there might be a collaborative effort between editors to bring this title to to FA standard, then return it to its rightful place. I must say here and now that starting from around mid-January I'll have very pressing real-world concerns that will bar me from extensive work on any part of Wikipedia until the beginning of February at the latest (not wikibreak strictly, just not much time to do long bouts of editing). I would be more than happy to take on the Synopsis (which needs trimming I think), Development and Release sections, and others can take on elements such as Gameplay and Reception. It's not a project for the immediate future, but at some point in the next month or two. Opinions? -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 23:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
I will try to help. However, I think the plot section is toó long and de could clean up the lead a little. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a merge discussion at Talk:Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2#Separation from main game articles. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 02:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Any sources for this, or is it a candidate for merger/deletion? czar 08:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
A user recently created the article Gladiolus Amicitia but it seems to be lacking out-of-universe information in comparison to Noctis' article. By the way, Noctis' article lacks information about his role in FFXV. Since I don't have a PS4, I sadly can't expand it but I'm pretty sure Noctis could become a GA once his role in FFXV is added. Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
This WikiProject has never faltered. The work continues and is just as strong as it once was. You guys are incredible!
I started piggybacking on the FA push for Final Fantasy VII; this article is particularly comprehensive now, mostly thanks to team diligence and a ton of new sources (interviews in particular). It's almost too much of a good thing; we'll have to trim some of that! I think the plot section is about as succinct as it can be, and the gameplay section reads a little better now than it did way back in the day. Technical writing can be very challenging in an encyclopedic register, as we always see with these rather elusive Gameplay sections; they're always the ones that are constantly rewritten.
We should also add a few tidbits regarding retrospective opinions—e.g. timeless story/gameplay, dated graphics/audio font, the archaic translation—which brings up a point I think we need to consider. Final Fantasy is one of the oldest video game franchises, and a ton of VG sources are giving other games the same treatment as FF7 by releasing retrospective reviews, analyses, and interviews. With the HD Remake coming for FF12 later this year, and Square in a constant state of nostalgia these days, it leaves the question: do we need to add a consistent "retrospective" sub-section to the Reception sections of older Final Fantasies? I think it's important for the sake of encyclopedic coverage to frame these classics in a more modern context. — Deckiller ( t- c- l) 10:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Talking about Final Fantasy, I'm surprised the article Terra Branford hasn't been nominated to GA considering it has a good amount of real world information. Same with Noctis Lucis Caelum (who could even be a FA) whereas Gladios' article might end being merged with the character list. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey everyone. Just wanted to let you know that Final Fantasy XV has an expired retention period for the Wikipedia:Featured topics/Final Fantasy series topic. Will be taking it to FTRC unless someone will be taking it for GAN. Also, the retention period for Music of Final Fantasy XV involving Wikipedia:Featured topics/Music of the Final Fantasy series will expire on March 13th. GamerPro64 19:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)