This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quick summary of our stats for the past month - please work on those popular stubs/starts! -- Pres N 02:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Format: Most popular (most popular non-FF if applicable) - Least popular
Clarification needed. Is Ehrgeiz part of scope under WP:SE? Because the FF series template listed it under Related Games, yet its not under WP:SE's scope. — Bl ue 。 07:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi all, I boldly redirected Minigames of Final Fantasy to Gameplay of Final Fantasy, but was reverted. I've started a merge discussion here - please come by and help form a consensus, it's been a while since the last one. -- Pres N 23:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
All articles higher than Stub class: 100% complete | |
Hey all, remember this? Since waaaay back in February, when I first brought up the idea of getting all of our articles to be better than stubs, we've moved from %79.5 to over %90 of all articles being Start+! That's more than double the ratio for the video games project at large. I've been slowly pushing articles bit by bit over the past few months, and we've gotten pretty far. Lets all give it another push to move us to %95+ or %100! It's mainly biography stubs at this point; if you can find even one source for some of these guys it could be enough to push them up a level. Please help out, and keep the SE project as one of the best mid-sized projects out there! -- Pres N 03:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Quick (super-late) summary of our stats for the past month - please work on those popular stubs/starts! -- Pres N 02:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Format: Most popular (most popular non-FF if applicable) - Least popular
Please list your name below if you are still with this project:
Put up a request at WP:RS/N#Dragon's Den as I realize it would be a marginal reliable source at best.∞ 陣 内 Jinnai 02:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
So the Eidos and "SCi/Eidos/ Square Enix Europe" articles are a bit of a muddle. I know that there is an Eidos Montreal and an Eidos Shanghai, and maybe another satellite studio. I can't find any evidence that there is any office anywhere still called simply Eidos, and I don't think that label is still being used on any game that isn't a re-release. The SE websites are a bit contradictory about organization, though none mention an Eidos anywhere. Am I wrong, or does Eidos only exist as an out-of-date web portal ( http://www.eidos.com) and a fond memory? ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 13:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Summary of our stats for the past month - please work on those popular stubs/starts! Switching to doing this every other month. -- Pres N 18:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Format: Most popular (most popular non-FF if applicable) - Least popular
Following articles on to-do list for "broken links" has been fixed:
Please sign your name if you are still with us.
Hey all, I've beaten FFXIII-2 (at least the primary ending) and have started working on the game's article. Sjones expressed interest a couple months ago in doing a collaboration on the article to bump it to GA level, so you and anyone else interested feel free to come on by and help out! I've rewritten the gameplay and plot sections, but it's all uncited and the plot was almost stream of consciousness, so it could all stand to be rewritten. Any input you have on the article would be appreciated! -- Pres N 21:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
I have recreated the Fortress article for the reasons expressed by Postwar, Bread Ninja and I at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Square Enix/archive/9#Fortress (Square Enix) (except for that outdated bit about the game not being cancelled). Is it possible to undelete the images File:Fortress_-_Judge.jpg and File:Fortress tech demo.jpg or should new ones be uploaded? Jonathan Hardin' ( talk) 15:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)