This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Food and drink Project‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
This is an archive of discussions from Q3 2014. |
Hello, |
I'm confused as to which reference manual/site was used to classify Plants (and possibly animals).
For example: Lilium Lilies shows underneath the heading "Scientific Classification": Kingdom: Plantae ; (unranked):Angiosperm ; (unranked): Monocots; Order: Liliales family:Liliaceae subfamily:Lilioideae genus:Lilium
I think this article and countless other plants articles have mistakes/errs. There are empty classification headings, Err/incorrect classifications, and I'm not sure but possibly unecessary classification categories added.
Using the Lilium Lilies article as an example, the empty classification heading shown as: (unranked): Angiosperm is one: not filled in and two: incorrect. The classification would be (Division/Phylum) and the correct Division/Phylum would be, according to USDA [1], Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants
Original Article | Correction | |
---|---|---|
(unranked): Angiosperm | Division/Phylum: Magnoliophyta | |
(unranked): Monocots | Class: Liliopsida – Monocotyledons | |
Subfamily: Lilioideae | Subclass: Lilidae* |
[*]Subfamily is listed lower down and accepted classification include: Kingdom,Subkingdom, Superdivision, Class, Subclass, Order, Family, and Genus followed by Species.
The reason I bring this up is because the accepted classification for plants is based upon Linnaeus's Systema Naturae. I've seen some articles reference the International Association for Plant Toxonomy, they follow that system, which a similiar classification system is used for the other 8 Kingdoms, yet articles are still either mislabeled, misinformed or completely incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.77.62.38 ( talk) 21:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Good afternoon. I'm working on some Italian regional cuisine articles and I'm in doubt: how should typical regional cheeses and agricultural products be categorised? Both subcategories of "Cuisine of region XXX"? Thanks. Cloverleaf II ( talk) 14:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The Italian cuisine article has been rated as 'high importance' by WikiProject Food and drink. It is currently GA status, but I have nominated it for reassessment. Any input would be great, here. Sotakeit ( talk) 11:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Quoting the article: "Some part of the plant was eaten by humans at some point in ancient history."
this article might at some point have been written by humans in ancient wiki history
and could urgently use some serious quality check...
-- ZweiterSternVonLinks ( talk) 22:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear food experts: This old AfC submission will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable topic that should be kept and improved instead? Or is this information already covered somewhere? — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
A bit of an overlap with Foodborne illness. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 22:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Food industry criticism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Just FYI if anyone wants to chime in. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I was wondering if restaurant equipment, and kitchen equipment is covered under the scope here? -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 03:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
A RSN discussion regarding Vani Hari, a.k.a. FoodBabe, has been posted at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#SPS material for Vani Hari – S. Rich ( talk) 15:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Please take a look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Darren Walsh (chef). I think the person is notable, but this is not an area I know much about. I copied the article to es:Darren Walsh (chef) in the Spanish Wikipedia, but I don't know whether it will be kept there. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I have been working on behalf of the folks at the South Beach Diet to improve the diet's article. I've prepared a new draft, which can be found in my userspace and is described in more detail on the article's Talk page here. I will not be making any direct edits myself due to my COI, so if an editor from this WikiProject could take some time to review what I've prepared, I'd appreciate it. Cheers, WWB Too ( Talk · COI) 14:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Potted meat food product and Potted meat. Yuck! Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 21:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Flagging this here as WikiProject Spirits seems to be dead: SPA account User:Kalexander11 added twenty or so "Expert Reviews" sections across a bunch of big-name whiskey articles last week, each time adding a single tasting quote from a cookbook which had been published the day before. Although this sounded like the quack of a WP:COI editor, the edits were defended on Talk:Old Forester as being better than nothing, with an uninvolved editor apparently objecting to their removal, but not their replacement. If any whiskey connoisseurs are reading, these articles could use some better review quotes. -- McGeddon ( talk) 12:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hot Chicken sandwich → Chicken sandwich
Hello All,
I've initiated a merge discussion for this subject at
Talk:Hot Chicken sandwich#Proposed merge. Please chime in.--
Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)
20:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello my name is Kathy! I am a part of a project group consisting of three other members ( Linda, Maggie, Tiffany). We are from Cornell University, and intend to edit the Spam (food) page as a class assignment for INFO 3460. We noticed that the Spam (food) page is rated as a C-Class article in WikiProject Food and Drink. We hope to improve the article to a B-Class ranking or higher. We were also wondering why the page is rated B-Class in WikiProject Hawaii. My group members and I have proposed a list of changes to the article on the Spam (food) talk page along with a list of potential sources, we would really value your feedback and ideas. Specific questions we have include what additional sections would be valuable to the article? Should a separate section in regards to production of Spam be created, and would this be different from the section regarding its history? If this is the case how should the information on International Usage be presented? If there are any specific resources, advice, or Wikipedians who can help that would be greatly appreciated. Any and all constructive criticism is welcome. Please respond on my Talk page if you can, Thanks! KathyQX94 ( talk) 23:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, |
Make a nice cup of tea and stop by the new List of hot beverages to learn more about the many notable hot beverages of the world and their history. NorthAmerica 1000 11:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)