WikiProject Catholicism/Catholic canon law task force is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Bias towards Latin law; non-coverage of Oriental law
Is there anyone familiar with Oriental/Eastern canon law? The wiki articles on general principles of canon law applicable to the West and East generally only cover the West. Also, most articles that reference "Catholic canon law" are really referring to Latin Catholic canon law. I only have a sufficient command of Latin law, but this is a wiki-wide problem. Canon Law Junkie§§§ Talk22:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)reply
I'd like to make a similar template for the
IntraText edition of the 1917 CIC. This would be convenient in making citations of that version more consistent with each other and with citations of the 1983 version. Any thoughts? I'm just a regular guy, no JCL or anything like that. --
KnockTroy (
talk)
19:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Veverve: Reason I ask is because I made identical edits to
Josyf Slipyj and
Lubomyr Husar which required a citation of CIC17, so I checked the project page and saw an online CIC17 and the '83 template, but no such template for 17. Probably right that it's not necessary, though.
KnockTroy (
talk)
22:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the
WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the
web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at
this Google form where you can leave your response.
Walkerma (
talk)
04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Requested move 6 October 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This seems like it could be reasonable resolved with a discussion inside WikiProject Catholicism, for as it will only affect said WikiProject I doubt the broader community would object to whatever you decide. However, as I am here, I would say that I consider the addition of "Catholic" to be redundant (the fact that it deals with Catholic canon law is made clear by the project name), and I have no opinion on the capitalization.
BilledMammal (
talk)
22:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)reply
@
BilledMammal: an admin has opposed the speedy renaming of the categories which depend on this task force until said task force is renamed to what I proposed, see
here. Also, I think it is not redundant, as it is possible for the WP Catholicism to have a task force dedicated to canon law in general and not only to Catholic canon law.
Veverve (
talk)
07:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
For the record, I withdrew my opposition to speedy renaming, as it was overtaken by a course of events in good faith. I agree that the renaming is desirable anyway, to distinguish from a potential task force dedicated to canon law in general, which would be a task force of WikiProject Christianity rather than WikiProject Catholicism. –
FayenaticLondon21:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support No need for parsing, as WikiProject participants are entitled to very broad deference in naming their project whatever they think best advances the goal of collectively creating the encyclopedia.
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
19:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Edits I Made to the Article on Tametsi
The article on
Tametsi showed up in one the list of suggested articles for me to edit. Since I am rather new to Wikipedia, I do not know if I did the edits correctly so I would appreciate it if someone could look over them. Thanks in advance!
LaivineOrodrim (
talk)
14:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)reply