This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 35 |
Hello, I notice crucifixion is tagged as in this wikiproject - I've left it as I wasn't totally sure, but that's a mistake, no? Dsp13 ( talk) 15:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Template:Persondata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Road Wizard ( talk) 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like other people to come to the talk page on Roald Dahl to provide input. There is currently a debate about his anti-Semitic remarks. I say his remarks (including "There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity.... Even a stinker like Hitler didn't pick on them for no reason") were definitely anti-Semitic. There are those who disagree, and say he was merely anti-Israel, though in an interview shortly before his death he did sort of refer to himself as anti-Semitic. marbeh raglaim ( talk) 19:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Louise Lasser seems to lack adequate cites (in, for example, assertions of questionable behavior in TV appearances). I'm not sure whether this warrants addition of {{Blpdispute}}, as I'm not sure whether the "unsourced or poorly sourced" claims are "controversial" per that template. Would anyone familiar with these issues care to take a look? Thanks. -- 201.17.36.246 ( talk) 20:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Rudyard Kipling has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Bob Dylan has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealwisp ( talk • contribs) 5 September 2008
There is currently a section in the John Fund article which notes civil claims and counterclaims made by a former girlfriend and the columnist himself. I have cleaned up the section, changing POV-ish wording and removing unreliable cites, but I suspect that BLP issues remain. For one thing, while I do not personally dispute the fact that it happened, the only source is a gossip column in the New York Daily News. Does this rise to WP:RS per bio articles? Secondarily, I wonder if the mere inclusion of a civil case where the claims were eventually dropped merits mention in a BLP. Thoughts? WWB ( talk) 21:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
For anyone interested, Jason McElwain is now a GA nominee. Any help in making sure it meens GA standards is much appreciated. -- Mr.crabby (Talk) 02:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like to post the WP Project template on the Danny Casolaro talkpage, but I am uncertain as to what |peerage-work-group = to assign to that parameter. I think what I am looking for is a peer review on an article which someone began in 2004, and which I basically rewrote heavily a month or so ago. I found a page which described instructions for placing the expression peer-review in the WP Project template. I understand that. However I am stumped by the parameter |peerage-work-group = (in the template). Would someone please advise me? Hag2 ( talk) 15:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Under the structure guide, apart from writing tips there is no recommendation regarding the naming and organizing of sections, nor is it mentioned in the manual of style. Am I missing something? If not, could a guideline be made, please? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 18:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Michel Foucault has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Thanks! Lesgles ( talk) 20:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Barack Obama has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
This biography has been recently rewritten to coincide with the anniversary of their death on November 27 as well as a feature film on them released around the same date. While awaiting further research material on request from libraries as well as some licensing for images it is now in a peer review. Other editors are welcome to offer constructive feedback and assistance. -- Banjeboi 04:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I know I'm not a regular here, but I imagine I'm not the only one who's watchlist has been lighting up recently with a purge of links to years (eg 1492) -- often leaving articles without any links to the date-hierarchy pages.
Personally, I think this is damaging, because I think it can deprive readers of a useful pathway to click through to find out what was going on in the world at the particular epoch in which somebody lived, who the rulers were at the time, etc.
A suggestion recently floated, both at WT:MOSNUM and separately at User talk:Lightmouse, is that at least the birth year and the death year in the first line should be linked, to give such a gateway -- eg "Judah Messer Leon ( 1166 – 1224) was a French tosafist..." . But this is opposed by hardliners opposed to any linking of "solitary years".
It seems to me that the wholesale de-linking of dates is more systematically affecting biographies than perhaps any other type of article. So I thought I should bring it here, and ask: would it make sense to have at least the birth year and the death year linked in any bio? Jheald ( talk) 17:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
A while ago, there was a request for a bot that would notify WikiProjects when articles within their scope are entering or leaving some workflow, e.g. when nominated for deletion or as GA candidate. (See User:B. Wolterding/Article alerts.) The bot is now implemented in most parts, and currently awaiting approval. Following that, it will be run in a test phase with selected WikiProjects for a number of weeks.
We would like to invite your project to participate in this test phase. This is in particular because the project's scope is rather large, and so the generated list contains many relevant examples for testing the bot. A list of article alerts is currently being posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Article alerts. There are no obligations when you participate in the test, but your feedback about the bot is requested. See User:B. Wolterding/Article alerts/Test phase for details.
The list can as well be generated for individual workgroups; perhaps also one of your workgroups is interested in participating in the test. Please let me know if this is so.
If you do not wish to participate in the test phase, please leave me a short note on my talk page. Many thanks, -- B. Wolterding ( talk) 18:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm working on rehabbing, copyediting, and sourcing Edward Drinker Cope. An issue I've had is with naming. In the early life section, I decided to call him by his first name, Edward, so as to distinguish between him and his father. Should I continue this pattern throughout, or should I switch to 'Cope'? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 03:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I notice that on the front page the 'Biography article statistics' show only two types of importance "Top" or "None". Is this a deliberate decision? Kwib ( talk) 12:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
A second question. Is "Core" a subset of "Top" importance or are the terms interchangeable for the Biography project? Kwib ( talk) 12:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
An RfC has started on whether the word "terrorism" can be mentioned and discussed in the article Bill Ayers, a leader of the now-defunct Weatherman (organization). The RfC Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC also encompasses the same question concerning the Weatherman article and the articles on Bernardine Dohrn and Obama-Ayers controversy. Recently new sourced information was added at the top and bottom of the discussion page and several proposals for language have been added. Editors are discussing whether we can come to a consensus. Please take a look and participate. -- Noroton ( talk) 18:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
David Helvarg has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Cirt ( talk) 10:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Carole Boston Weatherford, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Boston Weatherford. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang ( talk) 01:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I nominated Philitas of Cos as a featured article candidate; comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philitas of Cos. Eubulides ( talk) 05:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
El Lissitzky has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 03:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Further to comments above on whether people would think that dates of birth and death at the top of a bio should or should not be linked, an RfC is now open at WT:MOSNUM#RfC: Linking of dates of birth and death Jheald ( talk) 11:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I don't edit in this area, but I noticed that there is a long Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article on Nelson here: http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/lotw/1.html
It is the Life of the Day today, and available for a free substcription to Life of the Day. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 12:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I've created this page to link correctly with a few canal articles I've been working on, but I cannot find a portrait of this man. My search abilities do not extend beyond Google Images and Google Books, does anyone know where I might look to find a suitable picture, if one exists? Parrot of Doom ( talk) 12:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)