Not everyone may have watchlisted all the pages yet, so dropping off a note here to point out a temporary injunction that is being voted on: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley/Proposed decision#Blocks of Giano prohibited. Carcharoth ( talk) 10:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I would like to remove all of the following conversation to the talk page. It seems appropriate as semi-related discussion than actual workshipping. Is there any opposition? -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- apparently people wish to continue the discussion on the main boards. removing to prevent duplicated discussion
I have noted on the workshop page in the evidence analysis section that I have information relating to three of these diffs that provides context to them; however, this information relates to private and/or personal information of both Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians and includes what I understand to be information that has since been oversighted, or at minimum modified. Therefore, it is not appropriate for me to provide this information directly on the case pages. I will email this information directly to one of the arbitrators active in this case, with authorisation to share it with the other active arbitrators as he sees appropriate. It's the wee hours of the morning for me, however, and I will not be able to send this information until sometime late tomorrow. Should any of the arbitrators find this unacceptable, please let me know. My email is enabled, and I will try to check my talk page during the day tomorrow. Risker ( talk) 05:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have now forwarded private information to Paul August, as detailed above and in the workshop page. Risker ( talk) 11:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)