This page is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.
Hello
Howdy folks, I’ve been invited by
WhatamIdoing to contribute here and at the Medicine project. I’m a subject matter expert in these fields with >15 yrs experience across various fields of medicine, including product development, patient care, and basic science. I welcome you to reach out for support with existing articles or to contribute to new topics. See you around!
Gobucks821 (
talk)
14:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Gobucks821: A (rather belated!) welcome over here. There don't seem to be many of us watching WikiProject Pharmacology! Regardless, let's push on. It will be great to have you working on this project too!
Klbrain (
talk)
09:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I noticed a gap in the coverage of this specific triglyceride with a lot of work being done in recent decades, tricaprin, and would like some eyes on it as I work on getting the article ready for mainspace. I'm new to working on chemical articles with pharmacological applications and want to make sure I'm not putting in primary research to support medical claims here or otherwise giving undue weight to certain applications:
Draft:TricaprinReconrabbit17:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I've had a look at your draft; you are using primary sources, but you're using them as a statement of fact (that there are clinical trials for ...) rather than a claim of utility (that they are helpful for ...). So, my view is that what you've written is fine and helpful!
Klbrain (
talk)
09:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I only felt comfortable using language stronger than just "has been studied" when citing the NCI Dictionary. Thanks for taking a look. Once the production info is filled in I will publish.
Reconrabbit12:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sunobinop improvements
Greetings! I'm Valentine, an employee of Imbrium Therapeutics, the company developing
sunobinop. Because of my conflict of interest, I posted suggestions to improve the sunobinop article at
Talk:Sunobinop#Sunobinop article improvements and included the template for requesting an edit. I'm posting here since it's a more specialized topic and I thought this group might be interested. Thanks,
ImbriumValentine (
talk)
20:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
^Torgersen, Jessie; Mezochow, Alyssa K.; Newcomb, Craig W.; Carbonari, Dena M.; Hennessy, Sean; Rentsch, Christopher T.; Park, Lesley S.; Tate, Janet P.; Bräu, Norbert; Bhattacharya, Debika; Lim, Joseph K.; Mezzacappa, Catherine; Njei, Basile; Roy, Jason A.; Taddei, Tamar H.; Justice, Amy C.; Lo Re, Vincent (24 June 2024). "Severe Acute Liver Injury After Hepatotoxic Medication Initiation in Real-World Data". JAMA Internal Medicine.
doi:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1836.
ISSN2168-6106.
This is a
cohort study, which is classified as
primary. Per
WP:MEDRS, secondary sources (review articles) are needed to support medical claims. Furthermore the accompanying
editorial describes this cohort study as an "innovative methodologic approach". We need to wait for this study to be evaluated in reliable secondary sources before citing those secondary sources.
Boghog (
talk)
05:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the feedback and help. I see that per the verifiability policy, "If available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources on topics such as history, medicine, and science." Given the size of the study, risk of bias, and the source (JAMA), it seems solid enough, but if reliable sources differ, that matters. I don't want to jump the gun, but I'm not convinced we need to wait. Also, the editorial IS a secondary source. LOL, you've made ~leetk (1337k) edits, Boghog.
RememberOrwell (
talk)
07:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)reply