This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide
Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our
home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles
This page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the
importance scale.
Scope of proposal
The most pertinent question in most minds will be whether this guideline covers all red headed women in this age/vocation category or only natural redheads. Further distinctions among strawberry blondes and true carrot tops may be a bit too subject specific, and all efforst should be made to contain unrealistic
rule creep. --
Kevin Murray (
talk)
21:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)reply
I assume that this proposed guideline applies only to septuagenarian female plumbers with natural red hair and freckles. Where can I find the guideline for those with dyed hair? Also, which
shade of red? Thanks, –Black Falcon(
Talk)22:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Seriously, :)reply
Which of course begs the question, what of currently grey-haired but formerly natural redheaded septegnarian female plumbers? And at what point does one become a plumber? Does one merely need to be working in the plumbing industry, or does the proposal only cover liscenced and bonded plumbers? What about people with the correct credentials, but are not currently working in the field? There are some major problems we have to work out! --
Jayron32.
talk.
contribs13:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)reply
I think you will find it is more than you might realise. I assume we are counting species years, for example, human years versus dog years versus beaver years.
Peet Ern (
talk)
02:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)reply
I stand corrected. But does this mean expanding this page or adding another more specific guideline re Beavers who plumb in old age? --
Kevin Murray (
talk)
02:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)reply
It depends. If the old age plumbing beaver is also a horse jockey who formed a pop group and recorded one song then they should have their own guideline. Otherwise they should be included in the generic
WP:NF70+PB guideline.
Peet Ern (
talk)
03:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Will this criterion, ahem, age? Can one be a sfpwrhaf emeritus or just lose standing altogether? Do we now have to have ofpwrhaf's too? Notability creep. Bah!
Saintrain (
talk)
16:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)reply
ofpwrhaf are probably not notable. Actuarially, it is notable to make it to 70, but once 70 it is more likely to make it to 80, than for a 60 year old. Therefore, a ofpwrhaf is not necessarily as notable as a sfpwrhaf.
Peet Ern (
talk)
00:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)reply