This redirect falls within the scope of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the
Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.Manual of StyleWikipedia:WikiProject Manual of StyleTemplate:WikiProject Manual of StyleManual of Style articles
This redirect falls under the
contentious topics procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and the
article titles policy. Both areas are subjects of debate. Contributors are urged to review the
awareness criteria carefully and exercise caution when editing.
Where is this guideline discussed? I can't find any broad discussion anywhere. No one seems to dislike this guide; shouldn't we just add it somewhere and have it in place as an offical MoS guide? Unless we do that, not much discussion will follow, I'm afraid.
Shinobu16:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Okay. So is there anyone who is not happy with the current version? If so, what are the problems? Let's get this baby moving.
Shinobu15:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Only point four and five (partly) are already part of existing guidelines. Merging the new stuff in CL is okay with me, as long as it's kept, preferrably as a seperate section.
(Assuming Radiant has also read
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (emphasis)) Okay, to MoS:CAPS it will go then, providing the content of the guideline is kept. By the way, it would be nice to run this by Richard too - common courtesy. Although I might imagine his objections to putting this guide under MoS:CAPS rather than MoS:EMPH would be considerably less, I think I would still want to hear his opinion before a merge is conducted.
Shinobu23:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)reply
I left a note on his talk page. Since he conducted the merge, I take it that he wholeheartedly agrees. I'm glad everything is official now, and that everyone is happy with the result. No more ALL CAPS (I'm so relieved).
Shinobu13:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)reply