This page is an
archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
@
Nergaal: you pinged the wrong person about that. What's wrong with it? The book lists every state highway in numerical order, which matches the previous/next browsing order at the bottom of the infoboxes in the individual state highway articles. Ahead of those individual highways, the book lists the article on the overall system and the 4 lists. I see nothing wrong with that, so you'll need to explain your concerns instead of asking uninvolved editors to fix things. Imzadi 1979→23:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
To what end? Once
List of state trunkline highways in Michigan is finished off and sent through FLC, then we'll have a Good Topic on that subsection of the state highway system, and finally a Featured Topic on the State Trunkline Highway System itself. The book really serves as the adjunct to that topic, a topic of subtopics 12 years in the making. While state trunkline highways in Michigan have one of three different designation types, they are equivalent. The split into subtopics is a matter of convenience, lest we have a 213-article Good Topic. Again, the articles are set to browse M-1 → US 2 → M-3 → ... M-68 → I-69 → M-69 → .... That is the order the articles appear in the book. Imzadi 1979→03:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Just curious what the consensus for this is. I think that the GT/FT nomination process should only talk about if all the relevant articles are included in the topic, and there are no extraneous articles. I think if there are any issues with the article itself, it should be brought up at the article's talk page, GAR, etc. Thoughts? Kees08 (Talk)07:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)