|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
One of you may care to cast an eye over this, which I have just reiterated my oppose to. Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Gog, I saw Jo-jo's response to my query but didn't pick up your drive-bys till after my quick ce -- no hurry on this, and if you get satisfactory answers don't wait for me to close if you want to do it... Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi guys, wondering how people feel about some of the very old outstanding noms, e.g.
- Turabay dynasty: 3 months and awaiting completion of spotcheck and 2 other reviews
St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery: 3 months and still a question on referencing/coverage-- David actionedIron Man: 2.5 months and an outstanding oppose plus another ongoing review-- Ian actioned- Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha: 2.5 months and awaiting completion of spotcheck plus a couple of reviewers who don't want to commit
There are some others 2 months old but seem not too far from consensus to promote... Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 21:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- A swift response on Iron Man, which I have already been looking at. I think that if David is still opposing after this response, which he seems to be, it should be archived. I'll try to give considered responses on the others tomorrow. Gog the Mild ( talk) 22:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha seems to me to be close to being promotable. I am concerned over how long responses are taking, but the nominator did post that they would be busy for a week from the 23rd; ie they should be coming back to me and on the spot check about now. Perhaps a firm reminder? Gog the Mild ( talk) 23:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Turabay dynasty is certainly old, but has four supports and a fifth reviewer's comments were all addressed four days ago. It is waiting for Jo-Jo to wrap up the image and source reviews and the nominator to address Dudley's comments. Personally I think a poke at the outstanding reviewer and a nudge for the nominator to respond to Dudley is likely to get this over the line before too long. Quite happy to be told that I am being too sympathetic. Gog the Mild ( talk) 10:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- As the nominator's first one and being so close to wrapping up I was inclined to let it go as long as the source stuff gets addressed promptly. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 13:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Gog here. The nominator is actively cooperating with the reviewers and it's making progress, albeit slow I'd leave this one open for now.
FrB.TG (
talk) 13:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have posted firm reminders against both nominations. Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Vaguely related, I am looking to close Galileo project soon. Although, as always, I would be delighted if anyone would care to step in and save me the work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 10:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lewis W. Green time out warning
For information and/or comment [1]. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I am inclined to feel this GTG, but would really like a reality check on Benny's review, if one of you would be so kind? Gog the Mild ( talk) 17:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would feel slightly more comfortable if one of you were to look at this with a view to closure, or not. Thanks. Gog the Mild ( talk) 21:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am recused from Shovel Knight Showdown, but it may be ready to close. As Addie Viola Smith may be. Gog the Mild ( talk) 20:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)