This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Content assessment page. |
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9Auto-archiving period: 60 days
![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Pls can someone help in assessing the article Sugarhill Ddot? Thank You. 2RDD ( talk) 13:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Visa Requirements for US citizens has a B rating, but I keep finding citations completely irrelevant to the detail they claim to be supporting. 伟思礼 ( talk) 05:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
In the chemotherapy article there is an incorrect structure for the reaction of a nitrogen mustard compound with guanine. The correct structure is available at A. Polavarpu, et al., "The Mechanism of Guanine Alkylation by Nitrogen Mustards: A Computational Study," Journal of Organic Chemistry, 77 (14), 5914-5921, 2012. 66.111.123.176 ( talk) 22:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
A redirect page needn't have an importance parameter, but many do. For example, User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/New Zealand has 2,190 such redirects. Is there an automated tool that can remove importance parameters from all redirect pages for an individual project? Or is there another way to tidy this up, say by programmatically collating them in the NA column without the work of removing the importance parameter? Thanks. Nurg ( talk) 08:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The article on the Hebrew concept of Begadkefat seems to fulfil everything required of a B-Class article, except that it's quite short. It seems to be comprehensive within the topic, but I'm not sure if I can put it as B-Class yet. Thoughts? Robynfeather ( talk) 17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)