Wikipedia:wikiproject Warcraft Deletion

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Video games. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Video games|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Video games. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{ transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{ prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from August 2015) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Video games-related deletions

Jon Radoff

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBIO - while it does have a piece of significant coverage, the InfoWorld article, the others are just announcements and primary source interviews without substantive discussion. It does not pass WP:NARTIST either due to the fact he was just a co-developer or director of most games he made. When the article was first made it also failed NBIO and does not seem to have remedied that situation. There are a lot of minor mentions, but a lack of SIGCOV. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 05:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Video games. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 05:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom, still fails the If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability. as most of them are primary and just trivial Warm Regards, Miminity ( talk) ( contribs) 05:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

List of Hatsune Miku: Colorful Stage! characters

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Gamecruft, un-encyclopedic excessively detailed. (Although the move from the game article to a separate page was justified) IgelRM ( talk) 14:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Video games, Comics and animation, and Lists. C F A 💬 16:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment I am confused by the nominators rationale, if they say the split is justified then the article should be kept no? The concer about it being excessively detailed is WP:FIXABLE. Jumpytoo Talk 17:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Is it fixable though? Can we write an out-of-universe article sourced to third party sourcing? Or will this always be a massive unsourced collection of plot summary? Sergecross73 msg me 18:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Redirect to Hatsune Miku: Colorful Stage!#Characters, seems to fail WP:INDISCRIMINATE with no reception or anything besides pure plot. I'd disagree any split was "justified", this is the type of thing that ought to be pruned and not moved somewhere to easily sweep under the rug. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply
There are a lot to expand from characters page alone. For example, sub characters for each units (that gets deleted from the main page of Hatsune Miku: Colorful Stage!). In the Japanese server of the game, in-game's time has advanced to one year. If you actually play the game, you will know that there are a lot to explore from the characters. Of course I myself plan to write it myself, but it will take time and the current main page a bunch of mess. Yukinotane ( talk) 10:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply
The concern isn't necessarily expansion - it's already plenty long - but if there's a path to proving its meeting our notability guidelines, and can be written with encyclopedic content. Sergecross73 msg me 13:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply
Redirect - the characters don't seem to be independently notable from the game. It sounds like it was spun out due to it being a size split, but if you trim out the crufty, wikia-like content, it's simply not necessary. Sergecross73 msg me 13:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Andreas Waldetoft

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did not find any secondary, significant coverage in a search for sources that would meet our notability guidelines. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Video games. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Redirect - to Paradox Interactive. Plausible search term, very active in his respective company, but as the nom suggests, I'm not seeing proof of independent notability. Sergecross73 msg me 18:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Matt Firor

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficiently sourced and doesn't appear notable, redirect to ZeniMax Online Studios? IgelRM ( talk) 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Video games. IgelRM ( talk) 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Portugal 1111: A Conquista de Soure

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, with few reviews or significant coverage in reliable sources. This is one of the only reviews I could find, and it's in a publication of uncertain reliability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Portugal. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment: Lists PTGamers.com and Gamerstek.com under external links. Primary source [1] IgelRM ( talk) 12:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Both sites are now dead, which doesn't speak towards their reliability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

~~Delete~~Keep - Gamerstek review is archived here: [2]. According to their about page, they had a video game section in Destak newspaper, which indicates some sort of reliability. However, it's a moot point if there are no other potential reliable sources since 1 review is not enough. PTGamers.com review ref seems completely dead, but looking at their archived main site ( [3]) there doesn't seem to be an about page or similar, I can't find anything to indicate any reliability. -- Mika1h ( talk) 18:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Forgot to mention that Push Start ref, which is an independently published digital magazine, seems unreliable to me looking at the editorial page: [4]. -- Mika1h ( talk) 18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Gamerstek and Mega Score reviews are enough for GNG. -- Mika1h ( talk) 08:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment - The game got in-depth coverage in a June 2004 issue of Mega Score, including an interview (p.30, 31), and a review (p.70, 71). The only other coverage I was able to find is a brief mention of the game in a 2021 article from the newspaper Observador about video games about Portugal. It's possible that the game got coverage in Portuguese newspapers at the time of release (Newspapers.com has no Portuguese newspapers unfortunately and I wouldn't know where else to look), as the Observator article and the interview in Mega Score indicate that the game was partially funded by Soure city hall. Waxworker ( talk) 19:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I found a dead link from TSF (radio station). It might be useful to mention the game on the Visão article. IgelRM ( talk) 13:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 21:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep per the reviews presented above. Two reliable reviews, good enough for me. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 22:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. Reviews presented show the page can be retained. Add the 1 paragraph in Observador (linked above by Waxworker) https://observador.pt/2021/03/17/nao-e-so-em-civilization-vi-ha-mais-4-series-de-videojogos-onde-pode-controlar-portugal/ ; a 5-page article dedicated to the game: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235915242_Um_estudo_das_dinamicas_de_apropriacao_do_jogo_Portugal_1111_-_A_Conquista_de_Soure_em_contexto_escolar and I think that should be enough. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Iikka Keränen

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Digital Eel? IgelRM ( talk) 19:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. IgelRM ( talk) 19:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finland and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Redirect as above or to Doom modding#Commercial WADs. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Tau Corvi ( talk) 19:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two different Redirect target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read!
Talk!} 23:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirect to Digital Eel. Both are good redirect targets but I prefer this one. -- Mika1h ( talk) 15:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Miika Huttunen

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Pelaaja? IgelRM ( talk) 19:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, Video games, and Finland. IgelRM ( talk) 19:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read!
Talk!} 23:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirect to Pelaaja. Finnish version has some paywalled articles in reliable sources ( [5], [6]) but I doubt they are significant coverage. -- Mika1h ( talk) 15:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Harry M. Rubin

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon review of article and its sources, the person in question does not meet the notability guidelines in question: the person is not (1) cited by 3rd party sources other than websites that repeat his bio as an official founder of Samuel Adams beer (2) known for originating a new concept [see point #1] (3) become a significant monument, etc. (4) He is not cited as by peers and 3rd party sources for the work that is well-known or significant. The article was written by a blocked user and could primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink, Video games, Entertainment, Games, California, Massachusetts, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete. This is just a CV. No notability. ApLundell ( talk) 05:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC) reply

If deleted Harry Rubin (virologist) should be moved to the base name since Harry Rubin redirects here.-- 67.70.101.117 ( talk) 23:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Folks, My apologies, I actually meant to nominate Harry Rubin (virologist) Late night editing got the best of me. Upon a 2nd look at this article in particular, I found new reputable secondary sources to that show indeed this Harry Rubin was indeed a Samuel Adams co-founder. I'm closing going to close this deletion nomination in favor of doing some work to improve the article itself. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk) 04:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Maybe delete both of them.

Being a minor, behind-the-scenes partner of a business does not make someone notable.

ApLundell ( talk) 05:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

In the spirit of WP:GD I'm going to suggest that we pursue a constructive alternative such as improving or cleaning up the article. Two main reasons (1) Being one of the Samuel Adams founders both within the beverage field and just generally is definitely a major contribution. It looks he was not the frontman, but, indeed, he's been recognized by multiple secondary sources as being a founder and his involvement in various beverage investments is notable enough to be topic of headlines. As you probably know, media outlets have full control over headlines, which means that these media outlets viewed his involvement as "the story". On a more basic level, Samuel Adams is also billion dollar major conglomerate, it's widely recognized, and is part of the American social milieu (2) I digged into other secondary sources and there's quite a few other significant achievements such as being one of the people who started GT Interactive, which launched DOOM (a major video game) (3) This nomination was a careless mistake on my part so it's kind of a fluke nomination. My apologies again to all for that bonehead error and for wasting folks time reviewing this!

re: Harry Rubin (virologist) Even though I intended to nominate it, I also now lean towards keeping it. Mostly because his achievements within his specific domain are quite significant.

If we deny this deletion nomination, I can take an action item to improve both pages. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk) 22:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment: See also AFD'ed C. M. Rubin, his partner. IgelRM ( talk) 08:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need to hear from more editors as the nominator states they didn't mean to nominate this article (so a withdrawal of sorts) but an editor is arguing for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read!
Talk!} 02:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep: Assuming this is for Harry M. Rubin? Solid keep ... Sam Adams founding is notable + impact in AAA game studios with solid set of citations. Recommend the Harry Rubin (virologist) AFD be posted separately? John.mark1956 ( talk) 03:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete Not notable and written like a resume. Delete. Go4thProsper ( talk) 22:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Keep for the reasons I described above. As Liz mentioned above, I think withdrawing this nomination also makes sense. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15#Nuzlocke