I am re-nominating this article for peer review in an effort to get this article to Good Article status. I followed some of the recommendations as given in the previous assessment as well as the previous peer review. I'm hoping someone can go over the whole thing. Probably the biggest thing here is the Story section; I don't think I'm that good in making plot summaries.
I also welcome any recommendations/improvement from participants in the Military History WikiProject. MuZemike ( talk) 19:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)