Several Wikipedians in 2012 formed this collaboration resource and group dedicated to improving the quality of Wikipedia's Quality Articles, namely
Good articles (GA) and
Featured articles (FA). This page and its subpages contain suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to help, please
join the project and inquire on the
talk page.
Improving and proper use of referencing,
infoboxes and other templates are areas of interest to this project. References in separate lists are preferred, for the ease of maintaining both text and references.
-
Uyvsdi (
talk·contribs) I've been focused on Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles, but try to clean up neglected stubs that I come across. Am working on improving my own copy editing and writing style, and Wikipedia is a fantastic place to hone skills!
-
Yash! (
talk·contribs) : I specialise in India, Pakistan, Green Day, medicine and cricket related articles. But I am willing to help with any given topic.
SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 01:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC) I spend much more time on WP improving existing articles that creating new ones. We need better articles more than we need yet another article about some minor actor, or regionally quasi-famous band, or disputed subspecies of microbe. Most of the important articles already exist, but many of them are crap, and many that reach GA or FA don't stay there but become crappy again over time.reply
-
Nauriya (
talk·contribs) - I really want to see articles on people who are notably famous but have very less information on Wikipedia, passionate about award ceremonies, films and television articles of all genre and film industries.
Alaney2k (
talk·contribs) I have been working on fixing up references for articles, adding alts to images, reducing overlinking, those sorts of things for some time now. Even good articles and featured articles seem to have the need for a 'white glove' once over.
ARoseWolf - Gerda is such an amazing Wiki-friend and a special thanks for leading me here. I began here as Tsistunagiski (joined October 27th, 2020) which was mothers name but now go by ARoseWolf so creating a new bio here seemed appropriate. I enjoy articles on Indigenous people, cultures and their ways of life and the Ashkenazi Jews of which my heritage belongs to both. Articles on women and women related subjects is a significant interest of mine. Also enjoy the natural beauty of the Earth so any articles on geological locations and formations is of particular importance. People interest me. The way we interact interests me. The ebb and flow of conversation, even those where discord occurs, has always fascinated me because I see it differently than most and love to experience the world through others eyes because it enriches my own journey. Seeing articles written by others about topics deemed notable helps me explore that. --
ARoseWolf16:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)reply
theleekycauldron I mostly do American television, politics, and internet culture, but I can provide some level of help with almost anything :) most of my experience with outside topics comes from helping out at DYK's prep sets since August 2021.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/
they)
08:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Elizabeth (Eewilson) I work on botany articles and sometimes other articles that I see need improvement. I like to clean up reference sections and to find species images online to add to articles. I use Wikipedia a lot – to find music trivia, to keep up with current events, and simply to learn. I like to learn. –
Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (
talk)
04:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Frzzl (
talk·contribs) Didn't realise I hadn't joined! Here because of the wonderful Gerda being very kind, hopefully I can pass a little bit of that on :D - edit-wise you can normally find me skulking around conlang-related articlespace! Frzzltalk;contribs22:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Remsense (
talk·contribs) – Language, history, the arts, and philosophy, broadly construed. Narrowly construed—I suppose China, the late antique period, the history of science, grammatology, palaeography, and contemporary classical music are particular fixations I will jump to work with others on.
Remsense诉22:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
TechnoSquirrel69 (
talk·contribs) — I keep forgetting add myself, so here we go! I'm continually working on one project or another, so my goals align with this project's purpose; my promoted content currently focuses on music and film, but I'm likely to start branching out from there in the near future! —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
23:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The QAI people haven't commented here simply because they're part of QAI; they're part of QAI because they share some of the same ideas and values - one of them being that infoboxes are integral to the encyclopaedia. 31 August 2015
Andy is a dedicated Wikimedian who has among the many things he has done started the Voice Intro Project – a project to make audio recordings in which Wikipedia subjects speak their name and introduce themselves. Associated with that was an event at the BBC which got the corporation to release clips from their archive material under free licenses.
[1]
End of 2022, several editors have helped consistently without being formal members: 28bytes, Adam Cuerden, Amakuru, Amitchell125, Antandrus, Aza24, Ceoil, Cwmhiraeth, DanCherek, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, El C, Graham87, GRuban, Ipigott, Mandarax, MarnetteD, Moxy, PFHLai, Rosiestep, Ser Amantio di Nicolao, Storye book, Thriley, Thoughtfortheday, Urve, Wtfiv, Wugapodes. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk)
11:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The following table lists article name, date of entry here, date of desired appearance or "any", with a link to the nomination, the current status (pend = pending, req = requested, sked = scheduled, app = appeared), the author(s) (highlighted if QAI member, and if first TFA), area, nominator, notes.