First round submissions and results

Second round submissions and results

Article Creation and Improvement

• Roy Phillipps (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) → = 12 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 11:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
• Oswald Watt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) → = 24 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 18:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC) reply
• Roderic Dallas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) → = 6 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 16:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC) reply
• Les Holden (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) → = 8 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Initial article assessments: .1 Pts

Complete B-Class checklist: .1 Pts

Submit a peer review: 1 Pts

DYK: 5 Pts

• Oswald Watt
  • one DYK = 5 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply

• Les Holden
  • one DYK = 5 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

ITN: 10 Pts

FL: 40 Pts

FP: 40 Pts

FS: 40 Pts

FT: 10 Pts per article in topic

GT: 10 Pts per article in topic

Review of a PR, GAN, ACR or FAC: 2 Pts

1. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cedric Howell/archive1
2. Talk:Imperator Aleksandr II class battleship/GA1
   • 2 reviews = 4 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
3. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/No. 1 Wing RAAF/archive1
4. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/SMS Goeben
   • 2 reviews = 4 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 11:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
5. Talk:SMS Helgoland/GA1
   • 1 review = 2 points. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Submission pages list ( how?)