This article (and that for the Battle of Fort Donelson) is a model for what Wikipedia should do. It is comprehensive but not tedious, with good writing style. It is supported by useful maps (generated by the author). It meets all criteria. And no, I have had absolutely nothing to do with its creation or editing. (For persons unfamiliar with the American Civil War, the Battles of Fort Henry and Fort Donelson are often considered together. To my eye, the two articles are equal in quality, and that is why I am putting both forth at the same time.) PKKloeppel ( talk) 16:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, with some comments -
Nevertheless, a well-written and interesting article. Thank you for providing those maps! JonCatalán (Talk) 16:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Support
Conditional Support. Overall it seems to meet the criteria, but I would appreciate it if you fixed the issues I've pointed out below. If you do, I'll fully support it.
Besides those it looks good. Fix them, and I'll fully support it. Joe ( Talk) 21:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply