This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Panama. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Panama|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Panama. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Americas.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
I '
WP:BOLDly redirected this to
Panama Papers, however was reverted by an IP claiming that the redirect was odd given that no consensus had been obtained on either talk page.
The subject has no independent notability outside of their role in the release of the panama papers. I'm not sure if this quite fits into
WP:BLP1E given that the subject is anonymous and we don't know if they are still on this planet or not, however it certainly fits into the spirit of that policy given that the subject's notability is only understood insofar as they leaked the panama papers. Material about the subject is already covered in
Panama Papers so there is no need for a merge and I am seeking community consensus that the redirect be restored. TarnishedPathtalk02:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect Basically what TarnishedPath said, but Subject is not
WP:NOTABILITY enough, and the stuff in this article is already stated in both the opening paragraphs and the
Newsroom logistics of the Panama Papers article, so I believe this is a fair redirect.
Sharrdx (
talk)
03:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect but also consider this as a merger as the information is already in the target article. I think this meets not only
WP:BLP1E, but also
WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE. This person seeks to be a
low profile individual and remain anonymous so there is little prospect of any biographical information. It makes sense to have all the information in one article. -
Cameron Dewe (
talk)
20:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply