This page contains discussions that have been archived from
Village pump (technical). Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either
start a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.
You can keep it general and put {{#if:{{{1|}}}| and {{{1}}}}} in the template, and call it with {{subst:pizza|anchovies|..}}, or {{#if:{{{1|}}}| and anchovies}}, and call it with e.g. {{subst:pizza|a|..}}.--
Patrick22:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
To clarify what Patrick is saying, if you do not include an equals sign (=) in an argument, then the parameter has no name, only a number. Eg:
{{pizza|anchovies}} defines {{{1}}} as "anchovies" and {{{anchovies}}} as undefined.
{{pizza|anchovies=}} defines {{{anchovies}}} as null, and {{{1}}} as undefined.
{{pizza|anchovies|pepperoni}} therefore defines {{{1}}} and {{{2}}} so you must work with those.
Some examples of what you could do then:
Template:Pizza with contents: I like {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{{1|}}}|nothing}}{{#if:{{{2|}}}| and {{{2|}}}|}} on my pizza.
Which would produce:
{{pizza}}: I like nothing on my pizza.
{{pizza|anchovies}}: I like anchovies on my pizza.
{{pizza|anchovies|pepperoni}}: I like anchovies and pepperoni on my pizza.
However, to only allow specific arguments, like a predetermined list of toppings in any order, you'd either have to use a #switch for each argument (if you allowed 5 arguments, you'd need 5 #switch) and a number of cases in each #switch equal to the number of toppings. Or you can require equals signs in your arguments and use one #if for each topping.
Guys, I can't tell you how much I appreciate the help. However, after seriously thinking about how I need to go about this, I've realized that what I was asking for above wasn't a practical way to approach the problem in question. I'm very grateful for your assistance anyway, and hope you'll forgive the change of mind. —
Mike •
04:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Expanded watchlist
An easy newbie question, I hope. I have my preferences set to Expanded watchlist. Can you tell me, please, what the letter N means, when it appears in the left-hand margin against an entry? Sorry to be so stupid! --
MichaelMaggs12:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
What determines the summary for a Wikipedia entry that describes the Google hit?
For some articles, it seems to be the opening sentence. For others, it is a selected piece of text embedded in the article. There seems to be no default, or if there is, how does one change it? In other words, how is the Google caption assigned within the article? Thanks. --
PureLogic02:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I believe it's determined by Google's search algorithms based on the search term you enter. I'm no Google expert, though.
--james// bornhj
(talk)08:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
As the originator of the question, I will describe the issue which led me to ask it. Googling "Winston Churchill" brings up a Wikipedia summary which is the first line of his entry -- probably the Wikipedia/Google default. But if you Google the Professor who has been questioning the US government's account of the 9/11 World Trade Center collapses, "David Ray Griffin", the Google summary finds a criticism of Griffin that is embedded way down in the article. It is very odd, is it not?--
PureLogic00:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Sometimes, the summary (abstract) is far from satisfactory. If there's an infobox on the page, you might get a spattering of redundant and seemingly meaningless info.
site:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neon_Genesis_Evangelion: "Neon Genesis Evangelion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Neon Genesis Evangelion. The Neon Genesis Evangelion logo. 新世紀エヴァンゲリオン (Neon Genesis Evangelion). Genre, Science fiction, Mecha, Psychological", which at least contains some information, but other times is a run of numbers. --
GunnarRene01:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
how to keep track of the number of visits a certain page gets
I recently added a few articles on terms that my professor and his colleges have been using and wished to be used correctly by others. It would be helpful to know if people have visited the articles and how many have done so.
I was wondering if Wikipedia had the ability to keep track of the number of visits that these articles have received, and if this is in agreement with the ethics of the Wikipedia site. If someone could post a sample code, which could achieve this task, I would appreciate it. I am a amateur programmer and don’t have the ability to write a script on my own to accomplish this task. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Tiasusnmt (
talk •
contribs) .
Is there a page that enumerates the TOC-relates flags (__TOC__, __NOTOC__, etc.)? I'm looking for one that will cause the toc to be hidden by default. ~
Booya Bazooka15:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
When you click the "hide" button, it doesn't disappear — just collapses to hide the contents, and still retains a link to expand it. That's what I'm looking to do. ~
Booya Bazooka16:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there a way to specify the subheading-depth that the TOC should display. For example, if I have an article that has a lot of level-3 headings under each level-2 heading, how can I tell the TOC to list only till level-2 headings and not the level-3 ones?
203.81.221.6823:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Two Bots and a thing
I wasn't really sure where to ask this, so I decided to post here, where a broader audience may see it. I am in doubt about
this edit. As you will see, this is a user talk page, and it's a situation where a bot added an automated message regarding the Signpost (which I'm not sure should be done, but it could be that the user signed up for this...). But then, five hours later, another bot removed the message from the talk page, calling it an automated archival. I'm not sure that we can have bots adding and removing messages from talk pages like this. Perhaps one of those bots, or both, is malfunctioning? Or is everything just fine and I'm overthinking this? Thanks,
Redux13:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
The first was not an automatic bot, and delivered the signpost on request, the second archived old discussions (also on request), but apparently did not do it properly, as the discussion was not old, that is where the problem lies.
Martin14:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Update: Actually there is no problem, the message it removed was a different one than had just been placed there, so all is good. As to whether bots should do this kind of thing, both were done on request so I guess it isnt really a problem (though I don't know why they don't want to do it themselves).
Martin14:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad to hear it. Thanks, Martin. Indeed, I missed that the message removed was not the exact same one that had been added earlier by Ralbot — as it turns out, one message about the Signpost was added and another message about the Signpost was removed later; and, although I knew that it was a very tangible possibility, I was not certain as to whether or not the actions had been requested by the user himself. In any case, all is well, then.
Redux17:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
It's not possible. It's also not recommended to try to sign with an alternate date format (by hand, for instance) on pages such as this one which are archived by a bot (which ignores alternate date formats). --
cesarb14:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
On this wiki, don't. To have another wiki's behaviour corrected, open a
feature request explaining what the correct date format is for that language, so we can have MediaWiki output the appropriate format. robchurch |
talk17:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Just to clarify: everybody's signature dates are inserted with the same style and time zone so you can reasonably compare them when looking at a page full of different people's comments. Since they're part of the text they can't be customized for each viewer. --
Brion23:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
To my knowledge, the best you can do is modify how the date appears. You can't change anything else beyond that. See {{
User:nathanrdotcom/Sig}} (by doing this, you'd have to sign with three tildes rather than four). —
Nathan(
talk)/ 00:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I did not need to customize everyones else signature dates, i just needed to modify my own signature date (it is converted to normal text, anyway, when saving page), and Nathan described how to do it, and it works. Date is still the same, only now there is possible to change, how it looks. Time is still in UTC, too. -
Yyy04:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm thinking about using this kludge. The verbose timestamp has sp instead of nbsp between its components, causing ugly line breaks. Adding "(UTC)" everywhere is also dubious, what else should it be, server local time with load balancing surprises to make it as interesting as expressions using MOD? --
Omniplex20:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Changing edit textbox fonts
I've tried to change the edit textbox fonts by changing the IE font but this is not working. What is the best way to change the edit textbox font in IE form Times New Roman to Comic Sans MS? ...
IMHO (
Talk)
04:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
You should be able to edit
your monobook css to do it. Try adding this:
textarea {font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; font-size:110%;}
Tossed a little bit of code up there today that adds a "User logs" link in the toolbox whenever you visit a User (or User talk) page. I'm proposing its inclusion into monobook.js, or if you like it but don't want it included, the code is available there (or in my userspace as
User:Kylu/userlog.js) for use. ~Kylu (
u|
t) 04:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
On
Ladakh article, I'm getting the following error with some cites:
Cite error 4; Invalid call; no input specified
I think I'm doing all the right things, and the exact same syntax works sometimes, and doesn't work the other times. Could someone please check what the problem is?
deeptrivia (
talk)
04:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Try this: Insert 1 citation per edit. Whenever you get an error, post the code in question here, so we can analyse it. It's pretty hard for us to try and replicate the error with the information you've given us. --
Lord DeskanaDark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS07:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
You entered the code <ref name =Crossroads></ref>. This is incorrect; use <ref name =Crossroads/> (strictly <ref name="Crossroads"/>, but MediaWiki isn't so picky). In the XML standard, these are identical, but not for Cite.php. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
04:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Is the introduction of pseudo namespace
C: in addition to
CAT:
relevant wrt the future
Namespace manager? In
three RFDs
I claimed that it's a bad idea, but it could be also irrelevant, e.g. if there are no plans to introduce this feature on Wikipedia. --
Omniplex04:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
There's no such thing as a pseudo namespace. Those pages all exist in the main namespace. The namespace manager exists in an incomplete and unmerged branch of the code at present. It's worth pointing out that CAT doesn't categorise pages; MediaWiki will not recognise anything other than the local and canonical namespace names for Category as category namespaces. robchurch |
talk18:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, "pseudo" means "not really", it's in the main namespace. The mentioned help page apparently offers to transform "pseudo" into "real"... at some very distant time, if I got your drift. And sure, CAT's no category like T's no template, theyr're used as shortcuts. I'm not defending this, quite the
contrary looking for a good technical reason to at least limit it. Sounds like "namespace manager" isn't that magic wand. --
Omniplex16:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I think I can say with a high degree of confidence that there is no good technical reason to limit it. At most, there are aesthetic or ideological reasons. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
04:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't share that confidence wrt some hypothetical ISO language codes or Interwiki prefixes. The ideology is
KISS, C / CAT, or P / WP, one letter's shorter, "Project" works on all projects, that could be a reason to use one letter. But other ideologies are "if it ain't broken don't fix it" and for consistency just stick to it. --
Omniplex08:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'll admit, I hadn't thought of that. In principle, all two- and three-letter prefixes should probably be reserved for language codes; cat is actually the three-letter code for
Catalan in ISO 639-3. (Wikipedia, however, uses the two-letter ISO 639-1 code, namely ca, so in this particular case we can let it slip.) And I'll agree a c shortcut to some future wikiproject is entirely plausible. So I'm with you on killing C: in favor of CAT:, at any rate. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
23:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe we need a statement in this direction in the
WP:SHORT guideline, for starters I added links to
Special:Prefixindex/CAT:,
P:,
WP:, and
WT: on the relevant lists, so folks see what's accepted wrt "cross namespace redirects". The RFDs for the three C:xyz failed. --
Omniplex17:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Highrisk templates
Admins protected highrisk templates because editing those templates could cause DOS and highload servers. My question is: since Wikimedia servers also handles other Wikipedia projects (is this correct?), can somebody make this kind of problem (dos/highload/outage) on en.wikipedia by changing other Wikipedia projects unprotected highrisk templates? or viceversa. sorry for bad english. :)
borgx(
talk)03:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
As interwiki transclusions are not enabled, that shouldn't be possible (unless a high-risk template somewhere is automatically periodically propagated by bots (copied) from a central location to other projects or languages and is vandalized moments before such a copy, but that doesn't seem very likely). --
Splarka (
rant)
07:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Last time it happened (a high-risk template on en: was edited in one of the worst possible ways), IIRC the whole cluster went offline. However, that specific case shouldn't happen again, since the software and the server configuration were changed to avoid it. --
cesarb14:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I believe the issue you're referring to was replacing a template with megabytes of text. That should be impossible now, thankfully. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
04:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
No, it's not; it was removing an image from a template. {{Album}}, if you want to look at the history. The fix was some changes in the way the job queue runs. --
cesarb18:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
In general, DOS is not a concern with high-use templates at the current time, to my knowledge. The templates are mainly protected because you don't want a vandal inserting penis images into 200,000 articles at once. On other, smaller wikis, DOS certainly isn't an issue, because templates aren't used enough times to be an issue. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
04:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Secure server interprets wikimarkup differently?
User talk:Phaedriel appears differently on the secure.wikimedia.org server - everything after
Joshbuddy's signature at the bottom of
section 65 ("Asimov") is struck out, at least according to K-Meleon on Windows XP. After Phaedriel's signature at the start of
section 90.1, everything becomes struck through and red. Accessing the page via en.wikipedia.org, everything looks normal.
Kimchi.sg01:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Shortpages, Ancientpages, etc. - how are they run? The schedule seems to be erratic, now once in 3-4 days. Can they be put on a schedule? Once daily, perhaps? If not so frequently, at least on a known schedule. Thanks. - CrazyRussiantalk/
email01:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
They're run on a regular schedule, twice a week. By amazing coincidence, this comes out to once every 3 or 4 days. --
Brion03:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Just wondered what happened to the
Peterborough entry - it is missing, the page does not load in properly.
It worked fine on sunday and I have not done anything to my browser, the rest of the site works fine.
I recently downloaded a xml dump of Meta. I tried uploading it to my localhost wiki, running the same version, and when i try to upload it, it says something like "import source unknown". I have tried using the maintenance script, but it still has the same error. Is there something that I need to do prior to importing it, or is there a way to fix this error? Thanks, Shardsofmetal[
Talk |
Contribs ]19:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Don't repeat yourself / MediaWiki
I'm not really sure where to get started on this, so I guess I'll start here. I've contributed to Wikipedia for about a year, but more and more I'm finding that it's suboptimal for storing certain kinds of information. I've documented one concrete example of what I mean at
Don't repeat yourself and have some other musings at
User:PhilipR#Content_versus_presentation.
I'm sure that if MediaWiki doesn't currently have a module for conventional row-and-column kind of data -- and yes, i realize that even Wikipedia as we know it still has an RDBMS backend -- that something like that could be created. In my view this sort of thing would enhance Wikipedia immensely.
No, I'm well aware of templates. In that regard
one of the discussions about possibly setting up a template for each squads list, and why that discussion didn't seem to attain consensus, might be instructive. Even if that proposal had been adopted, it doesn't answer all my points -- for example, you can't sort a squad list by different fields just because it's templated. In general, it doesn't seem that one template for each bit of information (for example, templating Draman's name because we haven't yet resolved whether it's Draman or Dramani -- see my example on
don't repeat yourself at
User:PhilipR#Draman) is the right way to do things. -
PhilipR20:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps the question to ask is: If PhilipR is right that Wikipedia has an RDBMS backend, do (or should) editors have access to it? --
teb72822:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, plainly there are some things in the DB that editor-users shouldn't be accessing, like changing the history of a page. But that's a helpful starting point -- I'm envisioning that, for example, we might have a "virtual table" where the data in the table can get edited with the same audit trail that presently happens when someone edits an article. Only it's not a textual article -- it's just data, that can be presented a million ways in textual articles.
Simple example: suppose there were a "person" table with personal name, family name, date of birth, date of death, etc. etc. Then each time the person's name gets changed, that change propagates to all articles that use that name (that's the enhancement from the present setup). Another table might be "football scores"; another might be "Presidents of Brazil". I'm just blue-sky dreaming here; if necessary I can work harder to give a good example of what I'm envisioning. -
PhilipR22:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
One word.
Wikidata. OK, a bit more than that. :) There's been discussion relating to this for a long time, but as far as I know, no particular time schedule for making it all happen. robchurch |
talk23:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Rob, I figured someone else had probably been thinking about this problem, but had no clue where to turn. Now I do. -
PhilipR23:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
alignment
Hi, my question is how to use the align paremeter when grouping user boxes using {{useboxtop}} {{userbox}} {{userboxbottom}}(just right/ left isn't good enough).
Tal :)11:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
All content is far from being accessable in the most efficient form. Even for direct human consumption the information could use more rigid and meaningful markup. More over for the use in automation and to be of true use to a modern individual the information needs to be easily useable by the simplest of programs possible. That means the actual data needs to be stored seperate from it's presentation wherever possible and there needs to be far more defined and enforced structure to the information. Even more the raw data needs to be accessable to anyone and everyone by allowing the entire (including all revisions, posters, etc) knowledgebase to be obtained and kept in sync. This also needs to be done in such a way that the most simple of programs possible is capable of doing it. A modern source of knowledge can't simply be a novel new way of obtaining and publishing information, it needs to be formated and published in a modern format.
OK, I tried a second time and the article has now gone. But, for future reference, a pointer to the procedure would help.
BlueValour02:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
For some reason,
Image:Binary tree (letters).png appears to simply be a black box to me. Is this a browser issue? (I am using IE6). I have not noticed issues with any other .png files. I don't really mind that I can't see it, but I suspect that it might be a problem that others could have as well. Thanks!--
GregRM00:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
It's an IE thing. It looks fine for me in Firefox, but I see the same black box you do in IE. I brought up this problem a month or so ago with respect to another picture. Go
here and look at "Background colors for svg images". The solution for that image was to remove the corrupt local version of the image (there was a commons version that didn't have the problem). I know that this situation doesn't particularly help solve your problem, but it at least tells you it's an IE thing.
BigDT01:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
By the way, as a workaround, if you make the image any size other than the natural size, that forces Wikipedia to generate a temporary copy of it. I have set the image to 231 px so now it displays in IE. That's a workaround, though - I don't have a clue how to fix the underlying problem.
BigDT01:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks BigDT and GeorgeMoney. The 231 px modification seemed to fix the problem in the article, although as would be expected from BigDT's explanation for the workaround, it still displays as a black box on the image description page. Of course, GeorgeMoney's jpg version appears fine on the image description page. Thanks again to both of you.--
GregRM01:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
The reason for the problem is that an alpha channel was used instead of transparency. This is unnecessary; someone should edit it to change it. (Saving it as a JPEG isn't a good solution.) I'll do it if no one else does, but tonight I don't really have time. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
03:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Is this possible? I would like to make a table like the ones at
Utah-BYU rivalry#Results or
Army-Navy#By_year where the row is colored by the winner of the event. Currently, the way this is done is by specifying the bgcolor for each individual row.
What I really would like to do is have something like this ...
... where the row could infer its color from the name of the winner and {{start game list}} could define the colors for the teams involved. Is such a thing possible?
BigDT19:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't think there's a way to set the color in one template and use it in another, but you could use
m:ParserFunctions (specifically ifeq) in
template:Sports game to select a color, or define another template that selects the color given the winning team. --
Rick Block (
talk)
20:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I added the parsing functions ... unfortunately, you're right, it doesn't inherit the variables from template to template. I can only get it to work if I specify the teams and colors on every row (as I do in the last two). It won't inherit the variables from the parent template (as I attempt in the first two).
User:BigDT/Sandbox2
Any ideas from here? Another thing that would work is if there were some kind of iterative function ... for example, if I could have Year1, City1, Winner1, Score1, Year2, City2, Winner2, Score2, etc. That wouldn't be a spectacular solution, though, because of the nightmare of what happens if you have 100 games in the series and you leave out the second one ... oops ... any thoughts?
BigDT20:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
You can indirect the color selection through another template, see for example:
Yeah ... I thought about that, but then there has to be an extra template every time the table is used ...
BigDT23:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Please note that, in the tables above, some rows are now very difficult to read on some browsers. I had to open this section in an edit window to see what was written on the dark maroon bars. You might want to use paler forms of the colours rather than "full strength".
Grutness...wha?04:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah ... the colors were as an example. (Orange and maroon are Virginia Tech's colors.) The problem I was hoping to solve was a way of making the colors generic (meaning, to not have to specify them for every single row) without using a child template (which would necessitate a template for every page using the table, negating the usefulness).
In
English verbs, the {{Grammar series}} sidebar was just added after the {{IPA notice}} sidebar. Rather than being stacked, the two sidebars appear side by side, pinching the top of the article. (In preview only) I tried inserting {{clearright}} between them with no difference on my browser (IE6). I also tried enclosing the second sidebar in a div tag with style="float:right;clear:right"; that stacked them, but the top of the article was still pinched adjacent to the second sidebar. What's the solution. --
teb72819:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
But I think a better way would be to add a "clear:right" to the 'Grammar series' template since it is unlikely you would ever want it to be side-by-side with any other template. —
Mike00:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
More detailed article statistics suggested
Not really sure if to post this in BugZilla as a feature request or here, but I'll put it here as it is more visible.
Indeed, simply taking information buried on the “History” page and making it more public would enhance Wikipedia—for example, the “Article” page might say, “This article has been edited 350 times since it was created on May 5, 2002, including 30 times in the past week.” It could even add that “very active Wikipedians” (those with more than one hundred edits this month) contributed 52 percent of those edits.
”
Currently,
MediaWiki:Lastmodified has room for one variable, it being the last modification date. How feasible would it be for the article creation date to be there, as well as the number of revisions in a page, and the number of revisions in a given time period? The suggestion sounded like a
good thing, but I can't find in the
Database layout whether it is possible without running expensive queries on each page view. Would it require db schema changes, or I'm just not looking at the right place? Should it be something we do anyways? Comments? Applause? Angry lynch mobs?
Titoxd(
?!?)18:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I think this is an excellent idea, and one that might go a long way towards increasing transparency and confidence for the reader who doesn't know our inner workings. If it's not possible now, perhaps it can be added to the database in the future. —
Catherine\talk13:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
As it seems it is a good idea, and other editors agree, can it be done? I personally think that it could be done by adding a char(14) page_creation field to the
Page table, defaulting pages to blank and filling it by invalidating the page's cache, and filling the value on the first page view with the first edit's rev_timestamp value. The number of edits in history is available at
Special:Mostrevisions, but I don't know how expensive it is to generate that data. As for the number of edits within a week and the number of active Wikipedians, I have no clue how to actually do it. Is it feasible?
Titoxd(
?!?)03:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Sections
Is there a way to insert section headings in tables, such as at the page
Harry Potter cast? It would be much more convenient on that page to edit only the section of the type of cast rather than going to the top of the page. I'm pretty sure I've seen this done before, but I don't remember where or know how. Thanks. --Fbv65edel /
☑t /
☛c ||
17:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
It is. Thank you. I could have sworn I did the same thing myself, to no avail… hmm… LOL. :-D Thanks again. --Fbv65edel /
☑t /
☛c ||
20:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there some method that can be used to change one instance of a category to another - my specific example - I'd like to change all instances of "Category:Live-bearers" to a new category "Category:Ovoviviparous fish" - is this possible to automate? Thanks
HappyVR14:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
It's switched off on Wikimedia wikis, but normally, the numbers would show up in changes lists and under the "page last edited"/page view counters at the bottom. robchurch |
talk03:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Determining a page's popularity
Is there a way to look at a certain page's stats, like how many times it has been viewed, and how regularly, etc...?
Pacian23:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
No. How would it? Without subst: the template is not even called until the page is loaded, so nothing happens on save. --
Splarka (
rant)
00:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Does MediaWiki allow direct editing of history pages?
Not that I think it's a good idea for Wikipedia, but I'm wondering if my memory is failing. I used to be involved in another project that used the MediaWiki software and I swear I remember the ability to directly edit history pages, such as adding a forgotten edit summary. I don't think it was a local modification because we rarely used edit summaries and I doubt anyone would have gone out of their way to add this feature. I don't want to go install and configure the software just to satisfy my curiosity. Am I losing my mind?
Opabinia regalis17:35, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Rather, yes, you are losing your mind. ;) We don't have such a feature. Under limited circumstances entries may be removed from the history, but they may not be altered in any way. --
Brion17:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I was having a look at whether linkspam is an issue on talk pages and noticed the following things:
External links on talk pages are marked with "rel=nofollow".
Google does indexes very few "Talk" pages, but does index "User Talk" and "Wikipedia Talk" pages, as witnessed by the query
talk utc -user -template, or a direct search for a heavily discussed page:
Talk:George_W._Bush.
The robots file
robots.txt does not exclude talk pages
The links from article pages to talk pages are not marked with ''.
Number 1 is a good thing, but I don't understand number 2 in view of 3--5. Is there anyone with a clue? My hunch is that Google gives a very low priority to pages that are only linked to from one other page (i.e. from the accompanying article page), while user talk pages are typically linked to from many other user talk pages through the signatures.
Han-Kwang17:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
There have been problems with this recently. Try thumbnails of various sizes - small sizes seem to work more often. It might also be that the renderer Wikipedia is configured to use doesn't support some of the stuff used in your SVG.
Deco13:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I think I've finally got this problem resolved. If you see similar files blanking, purge them -- it should be the last time you have to. --
Brion05:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser requests are piling up...
There are at least 4 days' worth of sign-ups on there, of users who have requested to be approved for use of this special editor. This requires the attention of an admin. Here's the link:
Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
I recently made a search (in Wikipedia) for
acaraje. No results turned up, so I made the page that I linked to in the previous sentence. However. When I, through other articles, find an article named
acarajé, I'm baffled.
How come the search engine didn't pick up on the word without the accent?
This must be a major flaw, as most people (I think) do not always use accents in searches.
Yeah, but the question is how long before someone discovers the problem with every single article that is affected, and then actually redirects the page. It would be better to change the search engine, wouldn't it? --
Qwerty qwerty03:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
and another thing thats annying, is if you search for something, and it comes up with a major article which you dont want, I find then next 100 or so hits after than are redirects to that page.
PhilcTECI23:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
National football team kit
Am I the only one seeing the Portuguese national kit in white, green and grey? Can someone fix it please? (I work with Internet Explorer, maybe it's something that doesn't happen with Firefox).
Joaopais23:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Ever since the
2006 FIFA World Cup began, I've been forced to go through so many edit conflicts when editing that page. I think that for extra-frustrated people who can never get their version in, there should be "force save" button to paste in their version no matter what. However, since two people might both press "force save", causing another conflict, then perhaps make the "forced save" option available to only those who have gone through at least three edit conflicts. How's this idea sound? --
King of♥♦♣♠21:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah. I really get tired of having to go through multiple edit conflicts when I just want to save. Because of this, sometimes I edit in a hurry to not get into edit conflicts, and sometimes make mistakes. --
GeorgeMoneyT·
C21:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Crap, to be frank. The whole point of an edit conflict is to ensure that stuff doesn't get overwritten and lost. Allowing people to force their version through could result in a lot of harm on pages with a high edit volume. robchurch |
talk15:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I created some "In Use" templates more than two years ago — November of 2003 — to take care of just this issue, so that you could save a page with a flag to ask people to give you a short period of time - say 5 minutes to 1/2 an hour - to make a change and not cause a conflict. Some people have even improved on them to make the message work better. There are two forms, {{
Inuse|5 minutes}} or {{
Inuse|5 minutes}} or {{
Inuse||for=|until 3:20 PM EDT 6/26}} in which case you get either of the following:
5 Minutes: {{Inuse|5 Minutes}}
Until 3:20: {{Inuse||for=|until 3:20 PM EDT 6/26}}
Some users (incl me) won't know what EDT is. UTC might be slightly better, but is there a better way? The 5 minute one is fine, except without checking the history page I don't know whether it was posted 1 minute ago, or 4 minutes, or 3 days. (btw, although I'm nitpicking, I do think it's a good idea).
It might be worth adding - you can do draft edits in a text editor.
And when editing the introduction section, it's possible to edit just the section (which should reduce the chance of an edit conflict) - just click on the [edit] link for any other section, then go to the url and change the number on the end to 0, so it reads section=0 --
Singkong2005(
t -
c -
WPID)14:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
How do I locate and upload this image for use on Wikipedia?
How can I create a table with a background image instead of a background color. The MediaWiki software is sanitizing my every attempt. --
Jared W18:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
That is by design. Images should not be placed (in wikicode) except with a valid [[Image:]] tag, so that the description of the image is the image's only link. You can edit your personal
css to display them as backgrounds on specific class/ID tables, or try to convince the community of a wiki to add to the
MediaWiki:Common.css (see
MediaWiki_talk:Common.css for requests, but it is unlikely such a request would be adopted). --
Splarka (
rant)
23:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. That at least allows me to setup some <div> and <table> backgrounds from my own MediaWiki project. --
Jared W05:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, if you have full access to the install (in which case, why are you asking here ^_^), you could enable external images, or even remove the background-image attribute from the sanitizer ("whitelist" it, as it were) - I think you can do the same for <a> and <img> too. --
Splarka (
rant)
10:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Metrics.
Are there any metrics to determine the quality of a user's edits? The editcount tool leaves much to be desired, and I was wondering if there are any alternatives available. --
Folajimi17:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
There's no quick fix, as quality is measured by different, sometimes conflicting, standards that are subjective and often impossible to measure. You can't use bytes uploaded, because some users may upload entire articles in one blow, and others may add hundreds of kilobytes of gibberish that must be deleted, to pick just one example.
Titoxd(
?!?)05:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Editing toolbar does not appear in Opera, but appears in Firefox.
I am using Opera 8.5 on a Windows XP Home PC. The toolbar, which contains the buttons for common formatting such as bold text and links, does not appear when I am editing Wikipedia. I have tried editing a whole page, adding a new page, editing an existing section and adding a new section - all across several namespaces - and the toolbar does not appear in any of these cases.
I tried editing Wikipedia - both anonymously and using this account - using Mozilla Firefox 1.0.7. with Google Toolbar extension installed, as well as Adblock and SessionSaver. The toolbar did appear, and the buttons were fully functional. I have installed the NoScript extension, and it previously prevented the buttons from functioning, but the buttons are functioning properly now in Firefox.
I tried making Opera identify as Mozilla, but that did not help. The toolbar only disappeared a few days ago, around the time I noticed several changes to the MediaWiki software, including a warning about advertising. I will try to recreate this problem on another computer.
Hit F12 and make sure you have not disabled JavaScript. I'm using Opera myself and have not seen any problems with the edit toolbar. --
Sherool(talk)09:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your quick reply. I just checked and JavaScript is enabled. I will try using Opera on another computer to pinpoint the problem. What version of Opera are you using? --
J.L.W.S. The Special One10:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Opera 8.51 on Windows XP seems fine. What are the "changes to the MediaWiki software" you refer to? In particular there is no "warning about advertising" of any sort; perhaps there is some problem with your computer or a firewall application you are using? --
Brion18:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
hello,
i would like to present wikipedia with my new idea/ design of the above, would they be interested?
thanks,
o,
r,
paul
Section editing edit summaries
When you do section editing, it gives a summary " → section - summary ", and the arrow links to page#section. That only works half of the time. Sometimes, if the section title has a link in it, the arrow would link to page#[[section_with_link]], but that doesn't work. It should just link to page#section_with_link without the link, because that's how the TOC does it, and that's the only way for it to work. Also, if you link to a category or image in an edit summary, it shows the colon at the beginning. Even though you don't need the leading colon (for edit smmaries), sometimes section titles have it (for example if you had a section title that linked to a cat or img, it would show the ugly colon at the beginning of the link in the edit summary) --
GeorgeMoneyT·
C03:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Well basically, with the templates ENGf and ENGf2 another user wanted to use a bordered version of the england flag, but me and another user kept reverting it back, as the flag wasn't showing up for some reason, now the image displayed fine at full size or any size including 19px and 21px, but did not show up when the code recquired it to be at 20px. Most annoyingly after looking at pictures of this for a long while, it has started showing up, almost nullifying the value of finding the answer to this question. However I am still curious.
Also on a different point, when people say, maybe its your browser, do they mean, my type of browser, or specifically the program on my machine.
PhilcTECI23:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
This is in fact a FAQ, and a problem in the server; as explained at the FAQ at the top of the page, the solution is to purge the images until the thumbnails get lucky and start working. I would also like to know the reason the server misbehaves that way. --
cesarb01:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
See
Mediazilla:5463. The issue should now be fixed. (And as for your side note, they could mean either; literally they're suggesting problems with just the browser, but they could be talking about your computer generally too.) —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
02:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Use HTTP Codes for Redirects
We ought to use HTTP codes for redirects (3xx)
[1] because it creates a
canonical URL. Why do we need a canonical URL?:
This has been discussed many times, and we can't do it. This would severely damage the functioning of the wiki by destroying the ability to follow back a redirect chain. In particular this change would be welcomed by disruptive vandals who wish to make it difficult to undo their insertion of bogus redirects. --
Brion16:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello! I do not understand the methods discussed :
How to use HTTP for a redirect, and
How to follow back a redirect. Then why the ability to do this should be impaired. Is there an easy explanation, please ?
With HTTP redirects, the server asks the browser to fetch the resource at a new location. If that were done on Wikipedia, it would lose the line which says "(Redirected from
Example)" below the header (which links back to the redirect page), since the server would be unable to know the browser had been redirected when serving the second request (it would look identical to a non-redirected request). --
cesarb22:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Another problem with using HTTP redirects is firewalls that do not allow URL's with ".exe" in them can be bypassed because of the way wikipedia uses redirects. But, a bad thing that is always a hassle to me is if I wanted to get a URL, and I want the url that is not the redir, I have to press the "page" button again, and then copy the url --
GeorgeMoneyT·
C22:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Why pressing the "page" button? Just right click on it and chose "Copy Link Location" (or something like "Copy Shortcut" on a certain popular browser). --
cesarb01:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean copy the url, I meant if I want to create subpages. For example, if I follow a link to
WP:UPH, and I wanted to create a subpage just by adding the subpagename to the url, I would have to press the page button and then add /subpage. --
GeorgeMoneyT·
C01:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm well aware of this extension; I've been recommending it to people as a debugging tool for years. :) --
Brion06:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Individual IP detection via X-Forwarded-For
My ISP (westnet.com.au) says they would be able to track the repeat wikipedia vandal who keeps getting one of their proxy IPs (202.72.148.102) blocked if wikipedia could provide the X-Forwarded-For information sent with the HTTP request for the relevant edits. Is there any way to retrieve that from our logs? —
JEREMY07:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
You'd have to ask the devs, its not possible (as far as I'm aware) for users or sysops to retrieve that info. In the meantime, you might want to point your ISP to
m:XFF project to get their proxies listed.
--james(lets talk)08:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
I've done the latter. Once they're listed, we'll be able to precisely block the vandals and fix the problem. Thanks! —
JEREMY09:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
We don't actually need the ISP's involvement to list their proxies, as long as the proxy IPs are known and have an appropriate reverse DNS entry. In this case, unfortunately, reverse DNS for 202.72.148.102 just returns NXDOMAIN. If you could get them to fix that, that would be great. If it was something like "cache1.westnet.com.au" then we could be sure that IP really is a dedicated proxy. --
Tim Starling07:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
The ISP in question, westnet, now tell me "The PTR's for our IPs have been updated. This should allow Wiki[pedia] to confirm that the source IP is in fact a dedicated proxy." Is this in fact the case? If so, is there anything more I need to do for the problem to go away? —
JEREMY17:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm having a problem doing a redirect. I've done a number in the past but for some reason cannot seem to get this one to work. The redirect in question is getting
this to redirect to
this. What am I doing wrong? --
Wisden1721:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks Brion, for pointing that out (and sorry for troublin Mr. Vibber himself, I think this is my first interaction with you, but also my first interaciton with a 'developer')!:) I left a helpme and
User:Pilotguy responded, and I pointed out to him that the problem seemed to have solved itself. Brion is there usually a lag in redirects working, i.e. after creating them should they work instantly? This has been the case in the past when I've created them, hence the problem caused with this one. --
Wisden1721:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
No, they should always work immediately. If you find it not working again, please take a screenshot for reference; I'm curious just what happens... --
Brion02:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
If you're on page A, going through A?action=edit and A?action=submit to create the redirect, returning to page A, then browsers might use what they have in their cache for A no matter what you do on the server side. Guessing: --
Omniplex07:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Well you see I sort of thought that, Omniplex, so you can see from the page history that I tried blanking the page and then adding the redirect. That didn't work immediately and there was a good 2-3 mintues between my final edit to the page and the redirect actually working. I tried searching 'Gay Games VII' a number of times to test the redirect, and each time it would take me to the page with the redirect format looking like this:
#redirect
Gay Games (notes how the redirect is in lowercase, whilst when I typed it I used uppercase). I'll let you know Brion if I have any further problems, and get a screenshot off to you. Many thanks for your quick reply. --
Wisden1712:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
This "new" oddity just hit me elsewhere. IIRC #redirects with variables like BASEPAGENAME never worked, and [[../]] also fails (that could be new). For the ordinary case it can take minutes until a new redirect works, action=purge apparently doesn't help. Coming from another page adding ?redirect=yes might have an effect. Or it's a placebo burning time until the redirect works anyway. Was your observation also at a subpage, or anything with a slash in it?--
Omniplex16:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
1) What does "take me to the page" mean? Is that the extract listed in the search results, or what you saw after clicking the link?
2) What exactly *was* the link? Did it have "&redirect=no" on the URL?
Hi, sorry Brion, that wasn't as clear as it could have been. Right, to test the redirect I tried searching "Gay Games VII" a number (about 7/8) times. Every time it would take me to a the "Gay Games VII" article page, with the text as described above (namely #redirect
Gay Games). Every time I edited the "Gay Games VII" page I would get a correct formed redirect, however when searching in another tab (Firefox tabbed browsing) I would be taken back to the "Gay Games VII" page, as described above.
I'm not entirely sure which link you are referring to in the second question. The redirect that was trying to be achieved was "Gay Games VII" redirecting to "Gay Games". I came across the redirect whilst on new-page patrol, and could see that the editor was having difficulty creating the redirect. When editing the redirect I made sure to add "&redirect=no", so I got the right editing screen up. Every time I would save the edit, and each time on saving it would take to me to a correctly formed redirect page. However, if I refreshed the page, or searched for "Gay Games VII" in another tab (as described above) I would get the incorrectly format page (with the "Gay Games VII" page display #redirect
Gay Games). I hope this is clear and answers both your questions above. --
Wisden1716:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
I think the browser is doing a search after the name lookup fails on http. If you google http, you get www.w3.org as the first link. —
Bradley21:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Ah, that's correct. IE figures it's a bad link and says so. Firefox, irritatingly, just does a silent Google and returns the first hit, which is not good behavior. —
Simetrical (
talk •
contribs)
22:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Open firefox and go to the URL about:config. Type keyword. in the search box. You can disable the feature with keyword.enabled and modify what it does by changing keyword.URL. You can set it to http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q= if you want, and it will act like IE. Apparently in firefox it defaults to Feeling lucky search, whereas in netscape and mozilla suite it was a verbose google search. Shame there isn't a GUI for this, but that's how to change it back. //
Kevin_b_er07:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Loss of session data, intrusion attempt via exploit of MSIE script overflow
Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still doesn't work, try logging out and logging back in.
Every time I try to edit a page, the above message comes up. I've tried logging out and back in again, but it still appears. I can edit fine and preview fine so it's not a big problem, I'm just wondering why it keeps coming up. — FireFox • 13:29, 06 June '06
Um, prior to my first change, yes. It automatically shows the preview. It's not happened before though. — FireFox • 17:55, 06 June '06
There's a setting in prefs to show preview on first edit. Try unchecking that. Also try a different browser or two - some have issues with losing session data prematurely.
Deco20:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
It fixes the problem when I uncheck the box, but when I re-check the box the problem is still there. I've never had the problem before - it just appeared out of nowhere... no change of preferences, no change of browser or anything. — FireFox • 21:13, 06 June '06
I am having the same problem, but only when I try to edit pages in my user pages e.g.
this page, not when I try to edit my user talk page or other user talk pages. I did try logging out and back in. I don't recall ever having experienced this kind of error before (been here about a year).---
CH21:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Brion, Im getting the same problem. Can you tell me what the fix was? Can anyone help? Thanks.
Are you getting the same problem? The same problem means that all of the following are true:
You have "preview on first edit" enabled in your preferences
It only happens when you first click the edit link, not when you click 'save' or 'preview'.
It does not cause any problems with saving pages, it's just a confusing display of the message when you first click 'edit'.
I can confirm that this bug is indeed fixed, and I'm not seeing it when I test it now.
It's possible that you're encountering the actual session failure problem. The symptoms of this are:
Error message about loss of session data does show up when you click 'save'.
It does not show up when you click "edit" or "preview".
It makes it difficult or impossible to save any pages until resolved (usually by logging out and logging back in, possibly with an explicit clear of cookies in browser preferences).
I get that error when I click 'save' but not when I click 'preview' ONLY when I am logged in
All browsers (Opera, FFox, IE, Safari) have had their cookies and cache cleared out, I am suspecting this to be a bug?
--Previous Poster 09:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I get this error when editing large talk and article pages, even when the section I am editing is a reasonable size. Logging in and loggout seldom helps. I am using Internet Explorer, and going to tools->general tab->settings->files and deleting all wikipedia and wikimedia related files, sometimes works.
I have a fix or workaround however. I am running Sygate firewall and each failure is associated with an intrusion detection message in the security log, with this description
"Remote Overflow in MSIE script action handler attempted".
Disabling the Sygate firewall completely and reliably resolves the issue. With this information, does anyone have info or a theory as to why this is occurring? Are other firewalls also detecting this problem? Please assist, because disabling the firewall is not a satisfying workaround. I had to disable the firewall to edit this section by the way.--
Poodleboy12:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I will list the IP addresses that these attempts to intrude via this overflow are being made from as logged by sygate.
The overflow would be in Internet Explorer. Here is a description I found on the net:"This vulnerability can be triggered by specifying more than a couple thousand script action handlers (such as onLoad, onMouseMove, etc) for any single HTML tag. Due to a programming error, MSIE will then attempt to write memory array out of bounds, at an offset corresponding to the ID of the script action handler multiplied by 4 (due to 32-bit address clipping, the result is a small positive integer)." Perhaps Sygate set their detection threshold below a "couple thousand". Do we have a legitimate use for a large number of action handlers? Perhaps Sygate could not forsee such a use (due to lack of imagination?).--
Poodleboy11:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
MediaWiki doesn't use thousands of script handlers on the same tag. ;) It's theoretically possible that a buggy custom JavaScript could have added such a tag, of course. Check your monobook.js. --
Brion15:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
(edit conflict) The only place I know of where Wikipedia uses any of these is on the
MediaWiki:Edittools, which appears on edit pages. However, while there is a large number of onclick handlers, there's only one for each tag; the overflow can only happen when there is more than one for each tag. So, if that's what Sygate is detecting, it's wrong and it's a false positive (probably it triggers on a number of onclick close together, without considering that, as long as they are on different tags, it cannot trigger the overflow). In other words, it's not lack of imagination, it's a bug; complain to Sygate. There's also a
proposal to completely change the way it works, which would not hit Sygate's bug; however, that proposal depends on having editable JavaScript for all skins, which we currently don't have. --
cesarb15:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I have "upgraded" to IE7 beta 2. This also works around the problem without disabling Sygate or Sygate logging the security threats. I was at a completely updated IE6 before. -- thanx for your assistance. If it is easy to file bug reports with Sygate, I will.--
Poodleboy06:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
My report was premature, I now reproduce the problem on IE7, I now suspect that the buffer space within IE is shared, and that the problem is cumulative if you have several web pages open at once. I generally have two dozen or more open for later reading. Of course, it may be sygates detection mechanism which is cumulative.--
Poodleboy08:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I ran into this issue, and in my case I fixed it by opening up the permissions on the /var/lib/php/session/ directory. session/ had root:apache ownership and a 770 permissions. chmod 777, restart httpd, and now I can make edits. Hope that's useful to someone.
Redirect
This may sound silly but I can't get a my redirect at
Del Monte to work. I've tried hard to get it to go to
Del Monte Foods but it just won't work. I someone could fix this for me I would be Eternally Greatful. Thanks
Samuel15:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedians:
I, like you, am an editor; I create articles and make edits.
But, many, I am sure many other people out there, are tired, frustrated and angry with the behavior of many Administrators. I am certain that it is appallingly easy to revert and article, that someone has undoubtedly spent allot of time and effort writing. I have, in the past spent hours, researching, planning, writing, checking and revising an addition to an article only to have the whole lot deleted forever three minutes afterwards.
I know that deletion of material is essential in a free-to-edit encyclopedia, but if you see an article that someone has anonymously devoted their time to writing, why could you not revise it, change it or give a reason for you action? They deserve one.
I know all Administrators are not all Drunk-With-Power-Trigger-Happy-Nazis, many of you do an excellent job and you know who you are.
In closing: Create, don’t Destroy. Make a distinction between “what is right, and what is easy”. Be enriched and enrich others with the knowledge of other people.
And keep that finger off the trigger.
(If I don't cop flack for this one, I will climb the Reichtag Bulding in a Spiderman outfit).
I tried to add some images to
Hornussen but they don't seem to work. The images are on the German page so I don't know why they won't work on the English page as well. Hope someone can help. Thanks--
CharlieP05:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not so sharp when it comes to making links. I am working on a page for
Navagio and I have found that Βικιπαίδεια currently has an entry for it. On the Navagio page I would like the word "Ναυάγιο" to link to el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ναυάγιο_(Ζάκυνθος). How do I make an external link like that, without making a footnote? --
Skyscraper19:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Try [[:el:Ναυάγιο_(Ζάκυνθος)]], which produces a link that looks like
this. However, an article that consists of a link to just an external page can be
speedy deleted.
Titoxd(
?!?)19:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
How do I upload a newer versions of the images to add the copyright tags correctly?
2006-6-6
To change the licensing of an image, simply
the description page, there is no need to reupload an identical file. --
Splarka (
rant)
20:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
That didn't help. The user is still able to edit. I suspect that this issue somehow relates to the username, which appears to confuse the software to some extent. Blocking the account generates the following unusual (and partially broken) message:
You must include underscores to replace spaces in both
Special:Blockip and that template. The user is currently blocked, however, since it won't let me apply another block. Perhaps there is a bug in the new blocking stuff. -
Splash -
tk20:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Now it's doing the logout problem more. I go to a new page at times, and it says I'm logged out! I usually just go back to the page I was logged in at, and click the link again...and it usually works. I know my cookies and internet settings are set, so I'm constantly logged in at sites (unless I personally logout, which I haven't done).
RobJ198117:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Gingerbread Toolbar
On occasion, the toolbar at the top of the page (the one with my user name and such) will float away from me to the other side of the screen when I put my mouse over it. Even though it stays there afterward, it is a little annoying. Anyone know what's going on? I use IE.
I used to get this problem with IE occasionally. I use Firefox and I never experience it. As to the technical cause, I have no idea. --
OldakQuill08:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Mass editing images
I've been working on several US military pages, and have noticed that there are at least two similar images for each rank's insignia in every force, and they're jumbled and named very hap-hazardly. Just look at Category:Images of military insignia! Is there any way for me to quickly and easily rename the images to put them in some sort of cohesive system? I would like to delete redundant images and refer the articles using them to the superior image, etc. It'll be a lot of work even with a quick and dirty approach, so any help would be appreciated! --
Mordien06:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
From a quick browse through the category it seems that most of the images are locally uploaded (en.wikipedia). It is always preferable that free-content images be stored at Commons so that all other Wikimedia projects (and, in the future, non-Wikimedia MediaWiki projects) are able to use them. I'd go through the category, selecting all usable images and save them to my hard drive using systematic names. I'd then upload these to Wikimedia Commons and categorise them there. After this has been done, the articles should point to the Commons images and the local versions should be deleted. --
OldakQuill08:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
New template, any thoughts?
{{
Auto}}, when placed on a user/user talk page, displays any outstanding autoblocks caused by that user, if included in a standard series of blocking templates, could allow easy detection of harmful autoblocks, without having to alert the vandal that anyone is aware of them--
AOL user00:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
And yes, I am aware that the current formatting is garish and written in giant sized font, someone may want to change that before incorporating into any blocking templates, or vandal templates--
AOL user00:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
I think this is a great idea, but made somewhat difficult by the current wide profusion of block templates. Adding this to {{
unblock}} and related templates might help. --
CBD22:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Media file placement
On the
Gregorian chant page, the lede image is a music manuscript, accompanied by a media file with a recording of the song in the image. Is there a way to anchor the media file to the lede image so that it always shows up directly beneath the image, with the text of the article appearing to the left of both the picture and the sound file? Thanks!
Peirigill19:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Finding contributions from a range of IP addresses
Is there a tool to help look for contributions for a range of IP addresses? Or the ability to search based on only the first part of an IP address. For example, any edits from any IP that starts with "255.0". Thanks. --
mtz206 (
talk)
18:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
On the other hand, toolserver replication for enwiki is really bad, making recentchanges nearly useless. :( --
Interiot07:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
MediaWiki Password Unsecurity
Apologies if this is already known and/or being addressed, but here goes:
The "incorrect password" page mimicks the user's (incorrect) password in plaintext (in the HTML); if the user had typed an almost-correct password, it could become very easy for an attacker to guess the correct password (particularly if there was but one error and it was in a portion of the password that was a dictionary word or so). Given that the provided password is all but useless to a legitimate user, can it be omitted? --
Tardis01:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I just tried and all it said was "Login error: Incorrect password entered. Please try again."
Goplat01:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
You have to look at the HTML source, but he's right, it's there... hmm, interesting. I assume the way around this is to not return the failed password at this point, but just return the username and ask for a new password?
Shimgray |
talk |
01:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps I am making a silly mistake, but I just looked carefully at the password dialog and it does not appear to be in SSL. Are we sending passwords in the clear?
Robert A.West (
Talk)
02:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're sending that text over cleartext anyway, this doesn't leak anything additional. It's still not a very good practice, and will go away under upcoming login system revisions. --
Brion03:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I only put this here becasue the script that links to the media wiki autoblock page on
template:AOLdos is thiiiiiiis close to working correctly, which would cut down on vandalism a lot IMO, so, one more question... PAGENAME gives " " and PAGENAMEE gives _ so is there a 3rd variable out there somewhere that inserts + signs in place of spaces? otherwise the mediawiki link is never going to work correctly without being manually subst'd and debugged--
205.188.116.6514:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
The only way I know of to get something like 'User:Conrad+Bertrand+Dunkerson' (if I correctly understand that to be what you are looking for) into a template is to pass it in as a parameter. There is no 'magic word' (like 'PAGENAMEE') for '+' separators and no way in MediaWiki to parse sub-sets of a string. --
CBD20:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
What about {{urlencode:}}? That makes it so if you do {{urlencode:{{PAGENAME}}}} it will make it "Administrators'+noticeboard/Incidents" --
GeorgeMoneyT·
C20:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
This is an horrible name. PAGENAMEE stands for "pagename encoded"; what the swearword does "PAGENAMEEE" stand for? --
cesarb23:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Then feel free to move it. I simply stuck it there as that was what was requested here. PAGENAMEEE I suppose would be pagename extended encoding or something, dunno. If you have a better idea for the name, then put it wherever you want.
AmiDaniel (
talk)
04:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps I created my entry wrong to begin with - I am sure I created it as an article, but my wiki-entry on google search shows up as (User:) and then the title. Also, if people search wikipedia for my entry, it doesn't show up unless they search for it with the word "User:" before it. How can I delete just the User: prefix title without changing the whole entry? thanks--
Inky Dreadfuls21:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I have used the gallery tag but the thumbs produced are too small. Is there a parameter that I can use to increase the thumb size, please?
TerriersFan17:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
If you go to Image:Trafford View.JPG you will see the picture is tilted. Click on it and you get the correct version that I fixed and uploaded. How do I get rid of the first version, please?
TerriersFan03:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm using a Macintosh Safari browser, and when I log in to Wikipedia, the text gets larger and the page layout is all different. How come? — The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
201.52.69.223 (
talk •
contribs) .
I can understand the "larger" part, because Safari does draw text a little differently from other Mac browsers, but the part about a different layout is kind of puzzling. Things look pretty much the same to me across browsers (except for the font rendering). Got an example page and section? What skin are you using? --
iMeowbot~
Meow01:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Everything changes. I wish I knew how to make a snapshot in Safari, and then I would email the image to you. Let me check this. — The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Qwerty qwerty (
talk •
contribs) .
Press shift-apple-4 and the cursor will turn into crosshairs. Move the cursor over to the window you want to grab, and press the spacebar. The cursor now should look like a camera. Click and the screen grab (called Picture 1 and so on) will be saved to your desktop. --
iMeowbot~
Meow01:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
The main two unusual things I can see are that you seem to have Javascript turned off in Safari's security preferences (because the "Main Page" heading appears) and your default font is rather large. While holding down the apple key, you can use + and - to adjust the text size. You may also want to look at the other Safari preferences to see if there is anything else that seems odd. --
iMeowbot~
Meow02:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh wait, that's the "chick" skin, isn't it? (checks) Yeah, looks like it. The "normal" Wikipedia skin is Monobook, if you want to change it back.
Thanks Meow, I didn't know about the skins, but the reason I noticed it is because the default used to be different in my case, even though I haven't changed anyting. But now it's like i want it. Thanks. --
Qwerty qwerty02:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
The problem appears to have been sorted now, but I'm at a loss as to why it ocurred in the first place, given that it was an issue when
this edit was in place. Theoretically there should not have been a problem as there were <noinclude> tags present. --
Daduzitalk01:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I liked the update for the most part, but the "feature" that prevents duplicate blocks can be very annoying. For example, consider the following scenario:
an administrator sees an AOL IP using a vandal bot
the administrator blocks the IP for one week
realizing that AOL IPs should not be blocked for so long, the administrator decides to shorten the block
with this new "feature", the administrator has to unblock the IP first
during the short time that the IP is unblocked, it vandalizes 10 more articles
Without this "feature", the administrator could have simply blocked the IP again using a shorter expiry time. This way, the IP does not have to be unblocked.
It would be nice if the MediaWiki software would automatically lift existing blocks, much like deleting pages to make way for moves, when an administrator wants to place a new block on a user. --
Ixfd6420:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
This may already be a known issue, but I have tried looking for some discussion somewhere and can't find any. In Internet Explorer, when you get new messages, on the Main page only, the orange background of the "new message bar" doesn't show, nor does the border. On any other Wikipedia page and in Firefox it's fine. I can provide a screenshot if needed. Sorry once again if this is already a known issue. — FireFox 13:55, 11 July '06
Could be related to the trick used in
MediaWiki:Monobook.js to hide the <h1 class="firstHeading"> and other certain elements specifically on the Main_Page. Try disabling javascript and see if it still does that. --
Splarka (
rant)
08:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure how to do that in IE. Anyway, why would it do that in IE but not Firefox? — FireFox 10:51, 12 July '06
IE 5, 5.5, and 6 (I guess you are not using IE 7) are widely considered to be quite buggy (IE 7 isn't even finished, so there's no way to know how buggy it will be). See
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer.html for a list (complete with detailed examples, explanations, and workarounds) of some of the most annoying (and strange) of them. --
cesarb15:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Initials not working properly in IE 6
A
t the
Initial article, the examples do not render correctly in
Internet Explorer 6 for Windows. Could someone please try to fix them so they render in IE the way they currently render in
Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.4? Also, in both browsers, there is an extra paragraph break above the drop cap, which I think was added by MediaWiki; could someone remove it please? SeahenNeonMerlin23:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
ere's a
screenshot showing the page in Opera 9, Firefox 1.5 and Internet Explorer 6. Perhaps the best way to ensure cross-browser-friendlieness would be to use images instead?
Icey23:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
WAM!
I go to look at a page history, and then all of a sudden..
WAM!
All versions of this article are listed here in reverse-chronological order.
To view a specific version, click a date.
To compare an old version with the current version, click cur.
To compare a version with its predecessor, click last.
Agreed. Or, at the very least, can we please give it a CSS class so that people can dip into their monobook.css and display:none it? With all due respect to whomever made the alteration, for the majority of Wikipedians familiar with how a history page is laid out, it takes up a great deal of screen space and is closer to the center of the screen than the history data editors will be looking for. —
Mike(
talk •
contribs)
18:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
This has probably been asked before (maybe even by me, I can't recall), but is there any way of adding a way of making an edit summary when performing a rollback? It could simply involve one extra screen, a la "Delete page" or "Move page" asking for a reason - the standard "reverted edits by XXX to last edit by YYY" isn't always sufficient to let people know why rollback was done, and the only way at present of adding this sort of summary is going through the longer non-admin process.
Grutness...wha?05:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
No, other than by using one of the many automated tools. However, some months ago, an edit link was added to the "diff" view, so you can click the edit link on the left-hand pane, tab to the edit summary, type something, and press enter. That saves a step over the old way of loading the old version, before pressing edit on it.-
gadfium06:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
That would do it...yeah - hadn't thought of that, thanks. BTW, mention of the "Delete page" function reminded me of something else I wanted to suggest... see below.
Grutness...wha?06:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Adding optional "edit" links to the main page
I've created
a version of the main page containing edit links for the five featured content sections (intended for use by admins). They're hidden via CSS (
bypass your cache if they aren't), but this can be overridden by adding the following code to one's personal
monobook.css (or equivalent) file:
#sysop { display: block }
I'm hoping that someone with better coding skills than mine knows how to relocate the "edit" links to the right-hand sides of the section headers (instead of below them). Any help will be greatly appreciated. —
David Levy02:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
It'd probably just be easier to make them visible by removing __NOEDITSECTION__, and then wrap the entire page in a <div class="mainpage">, and *then* add .mainpage div.editsection {display: none;} to
Common.css, and *then* put .mainpage div.editsection {display: inline;} in
your skin. --
Splarka (
rant)
07:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, now having looked at your page, I see that the edit sections you are using are referring to transclusions. Two things: You can't use ID tags as there should only ever be one ID of one name per page, use class="sysop" and .sysop { display: block }. To get the effect you are after, you probably want something like Uncyclopedia used to have on the main page (based on the same design):
old Uncyc main page. View the source and enjoy. --
Splarka (
rant)
07:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice! I've updated the CSS code. (Please let me know if know if it's correct now.)
The Uncyclopedia source code appears to be based upon our earlier HTML (which was modified to accommodate users with screen readers). I don't know how to integrate the desired functionality into the current setup. —
David Levy09:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I see that the style of those headers is appled to the <h2> tags. Ick! Putting a span or div into a header tag is a bad idea. So, if you cannot change those headers to divs, the easiest thing I can think of is (for example, I changed your test page thusly): <div class="sysop plainlinks" style="float:right;font-weight:bold;position:relative;top:-1.95em;padding-right:1em">[http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}_{{CURRENTDAY}},_{{CURRENTYEAR}}&action=edit edit]</div>. It is a bit dirty (using a position hack), but if it is only to be viewed voluntarily, then it can't hurt. Note that I combined the div and span as you don't need both. Also, you should put display:none into the div style there rather than
MediaWiki:Common.css (unless it is site policy not to, or unless there are widespread plans to use that class to hide stuff most users don't wanna see ^_^). BTW: If you wanna discuss this more I'll be on IRC in #wikimedia-tech for another hour or two. --
Splarka (
rant)
09:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
"If" in template
I have just created a template called
Template:EPC Article (see also
Template talk:EPC Article for a user guide). This template contains an external link accompanied by an internal link to "
European Patent Convention". I have just a small problem when inserting the template in the article
European Patent Convention: the (self-)link becomes bold, which is not that nice. Can you help to insert some code to check what is the page name, and if the page name is "European Patent Convention", then add only EPC , and otherwise [[European patent Convention|EPC]] ? Cheers. --
Edcolins21:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Excellent. Thank you. {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|European Patent Convention|EPC|[[European Patent Convention|EPC]]}} works fine. --
Edcolins07:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Template creation.
I'd like to move into the magical realm of templates to add to my wikiskillset however I don't want it randomly deleted before i'm finished playing. Is there anywhere I can sandbox a template for personal play? can i create a functional template in a user sub-page?--
I'll bring the food14:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Looking at some of the FAQs, it looks like it may not be possible to edit link colors, but I haven't seen anything in writing. If I can, I'd love to know how as I've got something I'm working on for a page. --
Bveale16:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
From
WP:MOS#Color coding "Using color alone to convey information (color coding) should not be done. This is not accessible to people with color blindness (especially monochromacy), viewing articles on black-and-white printouts, older monitors with fewer colors, monochrome LCD displays (PDAs, cell phones), and so on." So unless there's a really, really pressing reason why the colors are needed it's probably best not to do it. I doubt it's possible with links, anyway. --
Daduzitalk17:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
It's actually for more than just the color alone. What I'm working on is some extra accoutrements to the fixture list I created for the
Nottingham Forest F.C. page to make each team they play represented by both their name and their colors so it looks something like this example for Yeovil Town, whose colors are green and white:
The reason it was hiding at the bottom of the page is that the table wasn't closed (it ended with a |- rather than a |} ) so I've fixed that. As for what you're looking for, the best way to work around it would be to use <span style="background-color: color;"> tags. So in the example you gave you'd change at [[Yeovil Town F.C.|Yeovil Town]] to at <span style="background-color: white;">[[Yeovil Town F.C.|Yeovil Town]]</span>. That would result in something like this:
I would stress again, though, that colours should generally only be used sparingly and only if they'd help users identify information, rather than for decoration. You might also want to consider letting the guys at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football know what you're planning to do as they're trying to standardise the layout of football related articles and could probably offer some feedback. If they like the idea it may even be included in their article templates.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Clubs is probably the best place to go. Hope that helps. --
Daduzitalk22:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Just to add that I've now realised you can change the color of links by adding a span in the middle of a piped link like so [[Yeovil Town F.C.|<span style="color: white;">Yeovil Town]]</span>. Using this technique you get the following:
compare version function in 'history' too very wide for actual practical use -- see what I mean?
On some pages, when I select two versions on the history tab, I get two very wide blocks for the compared versions. So wide in some cases that I've already acquired CFS (carpal finger syndrome) from jockeying the box contents back and forth. I'm using Firefox 1.05, and do not have this trouble with all articles, and not always with particular articles. This being so, this looks very much like a
Heisenbug (and if we don't have an article we should). On the general principle that ignorance or incompetence shared is dissipated, does anyone have an idea what's going on?
ww21:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
That is just long lines (often urls) of text failing to wrap. It is just how tables work. If a specific diff has a such a line in the changed text, or in the paragraph before or after any change, the table cell (and the table) will be quite wide. You might be able to limit it in your css. I'll investigate later. --
Splarka (
rant)
08:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I tried every css trick I knew (ok, I spent 10 minutes at 5am on it), and I could not get it to wrap long unbroken strings of text, nor to get the tables to squeeze into the page under all cirucmstances (except with table-layout:fixed which screws up everything massively, as the table widths and heights are not specifically defined). It'd probably have to be done with the javascript fix gadfium mentions, or one like it. That, or ask the devs to rewrite the table to be more customizable via css (give every type of cell a specific class, wrap the whole thing in a div and the contents of each cell in a div too, etc). --
Splarka (
rant)
02:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Editing Toolbar
I use IE version 6.0 on Windows XP and the editing toolbar doesn't work for me. Whenever I click on one of the buttons, nothing happens except that the insertion point in the text box goes away. Can someone help me? --
Anakata16:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Watchlist truncated
When I logged in this morning my watchlist only went back to (it appears) midnight today. I've clicked the various choices for the time range and am also sure I'm not reaching the limit of entries. Any experiences with this? I don't see any sign on the tech pages of a db crash or anything. . . (John
User:Jwytalk)
14:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh hang on:
07:58 Culture of Greece (200 changes; Page history) [86.133.237.95 (200×)]
write me aboutWikiFilter.I have down Loaded the folder but couldn't understand it --— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.163.2.66 (
talk •
contribs)
When I sign in to Wikipedia, I used to be able to type my username, password, and press tab, so that the "log in" button is highlighted. Now, when I press tab, it goes to "e-mail new password". Is there a way to fix this? --
HappyCamper02:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
The past behaviour was considered a bug, since the tab order was not consistent with the flow of the user interface. You should still be able to hit "enter" within the password box to trigger the form submission.
86.134.116.22820:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
That's very interesting. Are there other examples of calculations, or any other special things you can do with Magicwords? Is there a page that lists them? -
TrevorMacInnis (
Contribs)
23:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
If I use the "Chick" skin, the "Go" and "Search" buttons in the Search toolbar line up to the right of the Search field, obscuring some of the article.
C. M. HarrisTalk to me15:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Is the problem replicated on
chick this page while you are in the monobook skin? It looks fine to me. You might try adding to
your chick css:
Hello! I just wanted to know how to put my new
UCIMED wikipage in search engines such as yahoo and google. --— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Huaizhi (
talk •
contribs)
Hi! I tried to fix the UCIMED page to be as unbias as possible. Is it suitable enough? or needs more fixing? When can the page be launched at a search engine? --— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Huaizhi (
talk •
contribs)
We don't control when the page appears on Google or Yahoo. Yahoo and Google will scan Wikipedia on their schedule, and the page will appear on the search engines in a week or two (or three). If you have more specific concerns, please see Google's
[3] or Yahoo's FAQ. --
Interiot03:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Interwiki redirects bumping into articles
Maybe it is only a coincidence that I have encountered this twice today, once at
Wikipedia:Requested moves and once at
Wikipedia:Help desk, but it may indicate a inappropriately common problem. The two examples: The proper name for an article about this book is "War: Opposing Viewpoints (2005)" (see
Talk:War (book): Opposing Viewpoints (2005)), but it can't be moved there because anything beginning with "War:" gets sent to somewhere in
http://war.wikipedia.org another language Wikipedia. Worse, according to
Wikipedia:Help desk#Redirect problem: page vanished, an article that was at
V: The New Mythology Suite now can't be found and gets redirect to somewhere in
http://en.wikiversity.org because of the newly created "V:" redirect for Wikiversity. There may be several pages that aren't easy to retrieve because of this, and need to be fixed somehow. Possible ideas to fix the problem technically are to change interwiki functionality somehow or to not have interwiki redirects for common words or single letters like "War" and "V" which are more likely to have articles. —
Centrx→
talk •
19:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Has something changed regarding the edit boxes lately? Editing any page is really really slow for me, it takes about half a second for an input I made to be shown in the edit box, that makes writing quite painful. The problem only appears on the english Wikipedia, and only with Opera (9.01). I've edited the german Wikipedia and a random wiki at Wikia, both work fine. Firefox also works fine with all wikis. Interestingly, creating a new section with the "+" link works fine even with Opera. I haven't had any such problems with Opera yet, so I guess something has changed on Wikipedia. --
Conti|
✉19:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Aye, same thing is happening with me using Opera 9. I've never had problems before and they suddenly seem to have appeared. Sorry, I have no idea why it's happening. I'm guesisng it's some new javascript though.
Icey23:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Mea culpa, but in my defense: what the heck, why would that slow down Opera on an edit page, when that class only exists on
Special:Imagelist? Can opera not handle sibling css, even when unused? --
Splarka (
rant)
07:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that, Splarka. I'm going to assume your question is rhetorical, because we are only users of Opera, we didn't write it! :)
Icey12:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Aah, super fast typing again! Thanks! I don't have a clue how an why this affected opera, but the comment says "e.g. Special:Imagelist", so there might be more pages that are affected by that class. --
Conti|
✉15:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Actually it was Tim, I was just the one helping to
break it ^_^. • The question was partially rhetorical, but mostly yelled upward at the heavens. • The "e.g." was speculative and it only applied to the .TablePager class (which will eventually be used elsewhere). • It was the .imagelist class which had the td siblings (and the imagelist class only exists and should only ever exist on Special:Imagelist). I can verify the class wasn't used anywhere else because I only suggested it Tuesday night. --
Splarka (
rant)
22:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
One template spilling into another
In the
Kentucky article at the bottom, the {{Kentucky}} template is shown, followed by the {{United States}} template. Something is making the first template "spill" into the second, and I cannot figure out the problem. Could somebody please take a look at this and perhaps fix the issue? The {{Kentucky}} seems to display correctly in every other article it resides in, but not this one. Thanks.
Stevie is the man!Talk •
Work18:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Tested on Mozilla Firefox and IE6. The spilling over is quite subtle, by the way. The major aspect of this is that the border for the {{Kentucky}} template has disappeared, and it sits right on top of the {{United States}} template, and that shouldn't be occurring.
Stevie is the man!Talk •
Work19:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Added a 1em vertical margin (and auto-fied the edge margins and removed the 'center' align tag), look better? --
Splarka (
rant)
21:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Fixed (it was no spilling, it was outright breakage, which affected other things like the "Purple People Bridge" image and the sister project boxes). Now it's my turn to ask, what's the purpose of {{section}}? It's completely undocumented. --
cesarb02:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
The new template expansion limits, announced
on wikitech-l and wikipedia-l, are now in effect on a trial basis. Keep an eye out for any broken articles. Note that there is some information to help track down problems in comments in the HTML source of the parser output. To help editors to substitute templates for literal text in problem articles, I've introduced a new special page:
Special:ExpandTemplates. It works like adding subst: to all the templates, except you don't have to repeatedly save the page. --
Tim Starling07:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I posted this on
Wikipedia talk:Bots, but never got a reply, so I'll put it here. How are bots run? Do you need to download software, or can a robot script be coded into Wikipedia itself? I understand the policy about bots, but I couldn't find the answer to that important question. --
Gray Porpoise17:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Bots are run on some contributor's personal computer resources, and access Wikipedia just like any normal user would (over HTTP), i.e. they are generally just programs contributors run on their own PC. If you intend to run a bot, you should establish a separate account for the bot and get its purpose OK'd at
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approvals. There are also some separate tools (not bots) that users run against an offline copy of the database, on the
m:toolserver machine. No one directly touches the Wikipedia software itself, or any of the machines Wikipedia runs on, except developers. --
Rick Block (
talk)
18:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Bots operate the same way as humans on a computer with a browser. Think of a computer program that runs on your computer and edits pages on Wikipedia over the internet. The bot operator starts the program on his computer and is reponsible for what it does to Wikipedia pages. Some bots (programs) are run at regular times by the bot operator (every x hours, at midnight, whatever). --
Ligulem18:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
New & learning. I found the bracket for making a Category, but cannot figure out how to make the subcategory. Could someone post an example with the code exactly as it should be written for one page that has one category and one subcategory? I need to see the structure so I don't mess things up.
And in Uncategorised_good_articles, how do I remove an article from the list of uncategorized?
I'm trying to create a template that outputs noinclude tags when it is included (allowing the page using the template to show different content if it is viewed directly or included itself). Is there anyway to escape the nested noinclude tags so they work as expected? The documentation just says that straight nesting won't work (and it doesn't...I've tried it just in case), it doesn't give any clues as to whether there is a way to make it work.
Yomanganitalk09:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
The only way to do it (currently) is to place the template inclusion inside noinclude tags. On the middle page: <noinclude>{{yourtemplate}}</noinclude> (so the template doesn't show on the bottom page). Or, if you are just doing this for templates: {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|content}} (or other pre-determined tricks). --
Splarka (
rant)
11:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, unfortunately the additional step of including the noinclude tags around the template is what I needed to avoid, but at least I know I'm not missing something.
Yomanganitalk11:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure what is going on with this (Commons-hosted) image. It was recently updated to reflect some changes in the underlying data that it represents and when viewed on the image description page and in a thumbnail (the right image) it views correctly. However, when the image is used through a template, which is how it is used in
Tropical Storm Alberto (2006) and
2006 Atlantic hurricane season#Tropical Storm Alberto, it shows an older version. I did some looking around and this same image has the same problems on the other wikis that use the image, for example the
Spanish wiki (which also uses it thru a template. Any ideas whats going on?--
Nilfanion (
talk)
11:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Yea works now. I updated the image a couple days ago, seemed funny to be able to view two versions of the same image at once...--
Nilfanion (
talk)
12:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Deleting a disambiguation page
If a disambiguation page has two links, and one of them gets speedy deleted, it's no longer needed. How do I delete the page? --
Brat3203:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I've just found an error in the template
US time 2006. If somebody can find what's wrong between "USA Alaska" and the end... I think this is because of a change in is the template using policy in the mediawiki software (we had a kind of similar problem two days ago), but I'm not sure so...
<td>USA Aleutian</td>
<td>-10 hours ({{utc}}<!-- WARNING: template omitted, pre-expand include size too large -->)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>USA Hawaii</td>
<td>-10 hours ({{utc}}<!-- WARNING: template omitted, pre-expand include size too large -->)</td>
Those errors are related to the new template size limits. I'm not sure what's going on with the Alaska row, but maybe it's related? -- timc talk 04:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I moved the template documentation of some subtemplates into subpages as Tim suggested on this page here (
scroll up). It seems to work now, but I fear the transclusion limit is almost eaten up by monsters like
this one, which are very bad given the new limits. See also
[4]. --
Ligulem12:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Report a Contributor
Hi,i want to report a contibutor who wants to delete an article that i have posted — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Trppo (
talk •
contribs) .
Added categories to a redirect's single-line wikicode
I've stumbled on a special case where it was needed to categorize a redirect page itself. (It was for a CD reissued under a different title). It works, but it seems undocumented on your help page. For the full details of the case and what I did, see:
Even though it's a rare case, I think it should be documented somewhere on your help page that it can be done, and how and when. For instance, there are plenty of books or movies with previous or alternative titles: shouldn't their redirect pages be categorized too, so as to make the main previous titles be findable in categories lists too?
I'm trying to transclude the afd,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/11 Guilt, onto the
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 August 15 page. The transclusion isn't showing up there. I suspect Wikipedia has a problem with the "/" in the article name, and that technically speaking "11/Guilt" is a subpage of "9" Can anyone please confirm that this is indeed the problem, or am I doing something wrong. If it's indeed not possible to transclude, I might just rename the afd page to "9-11 Guilt". --
Aude (
talkcontribs)
16:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I have a div-Nav class pop-up on my user page but it's not hiding on default, as I'd like it to. How can I fix this, or could someone fix it for me? Thanks in advance. --User:Arual 16:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone check out
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists and see if they can duplicate this problem: At some point I created a new second-level heading after I clicked the "edit" link next to an existing second-level heading. Now, the edit links are all messed up. For example, if I click the edit link next to the "Departments" heading in the text, it takes me to edit the heading that is below that one. Any way to fix this? --Aguerriero (
talk)15:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Ahh, thank you sincerely. I knew it was going to be something like that. :) This is why I'm a writer, not a developer.... --Aguerriero (
talk)15:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. After conferring with the original author of the article
Narcissistic damage (which I had tagged with {{subst:prod}} for being a definition), it was decided that the article should redirect to
Narcissistic personality disorder. I edited
Narcissistic damage to place the redirect, added an edit summary, and saved the article. However, upon my return to it, the original article appears. When I click "
edit this page", however, the redirect shows up. Huh? Can someone take a look and tell me if this is a technical glitch or if I'm doing something incorrect? Thanks. --
CPAScott20:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Clear your cache. It should work then. Mozilla/Safari: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera/Konqueror: press F5. —Mets501 (
talk)20:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
(edit conflict) No, it's just your cache playing tricks on you. Try replacing "?action=edit" with "?action=purge" in the edit link you gave us above.
Titoxd(
?!?)20:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hope this is the right place for this question - please let me know if not...
When you're not logged in, "Sign in / create account" is shown in the top right of the screen. This is incorrectly punctuated - there shouldn't be a space either side of the slash. The same error can be seen in the title of the screen reached by clicking on the sign in link. How can this be corrected? Thanks for any suggestions!
Jenny Wong16:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Whether it's "correct" according to any particular standard, it is common practice to put spaces around the slash if more than one word is logically grouped on either side. For example, "apples/oranges", but "red apples / green apples". -
dcljr (
talk)
19:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
How do i view musical notation? I've asked lots of people that use wikipedia and they all have the same problem, instead of showing a sharp or flat symbol it just displays a square.. you can see an example on this Bebop article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebop
The problem is because the symbols are stored as the Unicode for those symbols (which is fine), and you might not have a font which knows how to display them. Get
Code2000, return to the website and see if the problem is still there. —
Daniel(‽)16:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Actually, you do have to get Firefox in this case, since that page isn't using {{unicode}}, and MSIE is unable to use any font other than the currently selected one (i.e. it won't use Code2000 without {{unicode}} to change the font). --
cesarb15:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Fixing a table
I've pretty much completed a table apart from one small bug, their is a white part in the top right corner i don't want to be there pretty much for aesthetic reasons, so could someone possibly take a look at the code and try and fix it, I can't see where the problem is
User:Curswine/Sandbox/Regionalliga. --
shanda14:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
An infobox is being designed at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Narnia/Sandbox/NarniaCharacterInfobox2. As will be made clearer when seeing the example template used on the talk page there, all five of the parameters under the "Family" category are optional. Supposing none of these are filled out, the long cell that groups them, that says "family," should not appear. However, neither
User:Lsommerer, the template designer, nor I know how to fix it so that if neither "spouse" nor "parents" nor "children" nor "siblings" nor "otherFamily" are used, then the "Family" disappears. Thanks! --Fbv65edel /
☑t /
☛c ||
01:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Here are all the parserfunctions available:
m:ParserFunctions. There's no easy way to do it. Perhaps create an if for each and if at the end it isn't there, then nothing, otherwise display. You may be able to use the swtich as well.
MECU≈
talk02:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
What I described does in fact work... see
User talk:Interiot/sandbox/or. {{#if: }} checks to see if its first argument is blank, so if you concatenate several parameters together, and they're still blank, then that means that none of the parameters were set. --
Interiot02:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
How do I add a link to a category, as in [[Category:Living people]] without it categorizing the page and the link disappearing?
AdamBiswanger120:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I comparing articles fine when I'm logged off. But when I try to compare articles when I'm logged in, Firefox opens up a prompt box that tells me to download index.php. Demonblade (talk)09:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Is your alt key (or equivalent) stuck down somehow? Tap it a couple times, see if that makes it work? (though if it were stuck down, it would make all links try to download) --
Interiot10:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
at the dutch wikibooks we like to use the buttons "next page" and "previous page" in a book (see:
http://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Rekenen/Modulair_rekenen : '← Vorige'). However this method is very stupid when the sequence of the pages is changed, or if a page is added or removed (the 'surrounding' pages have to be changed too).
Is there a way to 'calculate' the next and previous link automatically? My idea was to make for each book a page with a table of contents in a specific layout so the computer can read it. By placing a template the computer can look into the TOC-page and calculate the previous and next page. Is something like this possible, has anyone a link? You can answer in this page, or at
nl:b:overleg gebruiker:MADe86.39.65.85
Hmm, what could be done is to put it all in a 'table of contents' type template. This would require one base template (I chose
Template:Pageflip to test) for the system and then one sub-template for each book (eg
Template:Pageflip/Test book). Whenever you wanted to add/remove/rearrange pages, you need only edit the TOC subtemplate for that one book, which maintains a list of the next and previous page for each page (and must also contain the name of the book as the first parameter). The implementation is just one #switch which calls a next/for generating template, eg:
{{#switch:{{PAGENAME}}
|Pageflip/Test book=Edit this template to add, remove, or rearrange pages.
|Test book/Table of Contents={{Pageflip|Test book||Forward}}
|Test book/Forward={{Pageflip|Test book|Table of Contents|Page 1}}
|Test book/Page 1={{Pageflip|Test book|Forward|Page 2}}
|Test book/Page 2={{Pageflip|Test book|Page 1|Index}}
|Test book/Index={{Pageflip|Test book|Page 2|}}
|#default=Note: This page is not listed in the [[Template:Pageflip/Test book|Page list template]]. Please add it.
}}
And then it requires just one parameter-free template on each page of the book. See
wikiasite:Scratchpad:Test book and view the source of the pages to see it in action. However, if you wanted a TOC in hujman readable format, it would need to be maintained (as it could not be easily generated from this list while keeping the list easy to edit), so there would be at least two pages needing editing with this method. Still, makes it easy to totally rearrange a book's pages with just two edits. Let me know if you need any help or more information/possibilities. --
Splarka (
rant)
05:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I've built a mediawki 1.7.1 installation at work. Dates appear in whatever format I type them in (ISO, whatever), not what I have set in preferences. Also, the ISO date link as one unit (y/m/d all as one), not as m/d and year as on wikipedia. How can I fix this? Do I need a plugin or extension? Is this being caused by one or two issues? There should be a guide on "How to get mediawiki to work just like Wikipedia" somewhere-;)
Rlevse12:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI, Tim Starling told me the code is already in DateFormatter.php and all one has to do is set set $wgUseDynamicDates = true; in LocalSettings.php.
Rlevse11:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
long table of contents
I am promoting a merger of a long list of articles to a single one. My current proposed solution is at
User:GarrieIrons/Westfields in Australia.
My first immediate problem is the Table of Contents is longer than one screen. I understand it can be floated, but can the TOC be "fiddled" to "roll-up" subsections until they are clicked on? There are geographical sections based on Australian states and cities. I would like to see
1. Promotional Activities
2. Common Franchises
3. New South Wales
4. etc
But if you click on 1, 2, or 3, it expand so you get
3. New South Wales
3.1 Bondi Junction
3.2 etc.
Any suggestions? Have I merged too many articles, or do I need to turn some elements from real section headings to "pretend" section headings just using bold text?
Garrie00:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
First, take all your "External links" sections and merge them into a single one at the end. Then, remove a lot of headings; in several places, for instance, the heading "Stores" can be turned into a sentence like "Stores in this mall include:". These subsections all are small enough to not need to be separate. You will end up with most of the malls having no subheadings, and the few ones which need subheadings with one or at most two. Now the TOC is no longer the problem; if the article is too long, split it by geographic region, with a separate main article for the "lead". Hope this helps. --
cesarb01:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I am aware that currently the page is a series of pages which each had sections, dumped onto a single page. I am still concerned that "just" having the states, and the locations within the state that have a Westfield, will result in quite a long TOC. Hopefully, floating it will help this problem.
I don't really want to strip the link to each store's entry on the external website down to a single external link, at the time of launching the merged page. Maybe later when the noise dies down....
I am using inkscape and when I upload images wich contein some text they are not correctly visualized in wikipedia (even if inkscape do it correctly): the text either is not visualized at all or is replaced by "black blocks" such as
this. Can someone help me to find out what is the problem?--
Pokipsy7617:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
This has been asked before here; the problem is that inkscape is generating SVGs using the current draft of the next version of the SVG standard, instead of the current version. Neither rsvg (which Wikipedia uses) nor Firefox understand the new elements. --
cesarb21:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, how do I make sure a new paragraph starts at the leftmost point, past a picture that might keep it indented? Example:
118 WallyPower. If your browser window has the right width, the "Features" section title is indented (because its below a picture) while the accompanying hr-line is not. I'd like to move both elements a bit down, and I know there is a mediawiki command for that ("move an element as much down as needed so that it can stay leftmost"). Can anybody tell me its name?
Question 2: Can anybody pinpoint me to the complete mediawiki command set overview?
Fantastic, thanks! :-) I'm actually looking for a guide that is very complete, ideally it should also include things like this template. Might I suggest we create one if there is none?
Peter S.00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I can't view the changes between different versions i.e. the "compare selected versions" in the history of pages. I was always able to until one day I fiddled around in my preferences and now whenever I want to view the differences between past pages, a file download window always appears asking to download a file named "index" of an unknown file type and when I open this file, with Internet Explorer some random text appears. What's wrong? How do I fix this? I tried going through my preferences and changing them back - but the problem is still there! Please help!!
Tanzeel23:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
You probably turned on "Use external diff by default" which is under the Editing section of
your preferences. Turning it off should fix the problem. Let me know if it doesn't, happy editing!
Prodegotalk23:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
search box focus
How would one go about making the focus of a Wikipedia site the search box every time? For example, if you opened the Main Page and you wanted a blinking cursor in the search box without any input from the user, how would you do that or where would be a good place to find out? Thanks.
ndyguy18:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
If you're using the monobook skin, press [alt]-f to put the cursor in the search box. There's no way to do it automatically. —Mets501 (
talk)18:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I want to upload a promotional image for a band. I've found the correct tag: {{promotional}}
However, I can't figure out what to put for licensing. I've gone down the drop-down list numerous times, and none of them seem to correspond. Could anyone with a bit more experience uploading images help me out a bit? Thanks in advance!
--
NinjaCharlie16:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
If you just type the tag into the box, then that shall suffice. You do not have to selected an item from the drop down box. (I also corrected the display of the template above. To talk about a template but not show it, you need to add tl| before the name, so the above would be {{tl|promotional}} and will display as above. It helps prevent confusion and since this page isn't being applied the Promotional copyright, it's also not correct to put it on here like that. No big deal though.) Be sure to include the source URL or whatever you found the image.
MECU≈
talk17:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there any section which explains the various tags within the XML dump file
I would like to publish the contents of wikipedia on my site. I am looking for a list of all the possible xml tags and their explanation. Any idea where I can locate that information. Thanks. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
59.163.2.66 (
talk •
contribs) 09:10, August 12, 2006 (UTC).
Thanks, Splarka. I get the feeling I should have figured this out for myself! Apologies for asking stupid questions...
Jim (
Talk)
10:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Page history
When comparing two versions of a page on the page history, users (or at least me) have to click multiple times on the little dots on each version of the page. It would be nice if one did not have to do this every time one wants to compare another user's edits. Respectfully,
Republitarian17:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
If you have a tabbed browser, you can also hold [ctrl] and click a bunch of those little (diff) links in a series to open them into new tabs. --
Splarka (
rant)
22:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
We are redesigning the sidebar that appears on every page of Wikipedia. However, we've run into some implementation problems. The biggest one is that we can't put a new menu below the search box. We need capable php programmers and those knowledgeable about the MediaWiki software to figure out a way. Please join us at Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign. --
Nexus Seven11:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
What links here bug?
This shows no pages linking to the page [[Image:editcount.png]] (I'm not linking it here lest it eliminate this problem!) and there are no file links listed on the image page. However, it is linked to as [[:Image:editcount.png]] from
Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters. Is this a bug?
Lupin|
talk|
popups11:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there a way to define the {col} and {colgroup} attributes within a table using wiki markup? If so, how? I'd like to have all the numbers in one column aligned to the right but it is a pain to define the alignment in each cell.
Help:Table is most useless when it comes to this question. Many thanks! --
RuneWelsh |
ταλκ10:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Problem in fixing disambiguation link in userbox template
Hi, I was doing a bit of fixing of disambiguation links from
Bucks Fizz, which can be either
Bucks Fizz (band) or
Bucks Fizz (cocktail). I found that the disambiguation page linked to
User:Fizzerbear, who had
this userbox template, saying "This user loves
Bucks Fizz." After checking the context to see if the user loves the drink or the pop group (the template has "fan-3", and the user also loves ABBA and Kylie Minogue), I changed [[Bucks Fizz]] to [[Bucks Fizz (band)|Bucks Fizz]]. I pressed Preview, to see if it worked, and it actually appeared as "Bucks Fizz (band)". In other words, the piped link didn't work. I tried using the square brackets, but they were visible when I pressed preview. It seems that it should be possible for that template to allow a link to a favourite group without having to show the full Wikipedia title of the page. Any ideas? Thanks.
AnnH♫09:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I assume you tried something like {{User artist-3|Bucks Fizz (band)|Bucks Fizz}}, which calls the template with two parameters. You could do it like this: {{User artist-3|Bucks Fizz (band){{!}}Bucks Fizz}} (which is an ugly hack and should best be avoided if possible). The | is interpreted as a parameter separator in template calls, so it can't be used as part of the text for a parameter. MediaWiki software lacks an escape mechanism for terminal syntax symbols. A better way would be to change the template to have an additional parameter that takes the part "Bucks Fizz" of the call and add the pipe inside the template. --
Ligulem10:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Any way to remove underscoring of within-article hypertext?
The argument for underscoring is, I suppose, that newbies will more quickly figure that the hypertext is a link. As reader, however, I underscoring an unnecessary distraction. Thx.
Thomasmeeks15:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Either go to
your perferences and click on the "misc" tab, then select "never" for the underlining links part. Or you can put this in
your monobook.css:
a { text-decoration: none; }
If you don't want to bother with links at all, use:
/* IE-able */
a, a.new {color: black; text-decoration: none;}
/* NON IE */
a, a.new {color: inherit; text-decoration: none;}
Um... I'm not seeing any Tables of Contents anymore, even though my preferences still indicate I should see them. Am I the only one? -
dcljr (
talk)
08:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
We've decided that it's a good idea to get rid of fair use galleries, as they violate our core principles, but ... how do we find them other than trying to remember on our own where each of us saw them? One way I could think of is to use a <gallery>-type regex on a db dump, finding galleries with four or more images in them, and then checking the description pages on those images to see if they have any of the fair-use image templates on them. This won't be perfect, as some images don't have the exact templates, but rather, have a written out fair use rationale, but this could be a start. Might anyone be interested in pursuing this? I don't really have the technical ability to do it, but hopefully someone else does! --
Cyde Weys06:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Might it not be easier to check the usage of fair use images (by Whatlinkshere on templates in
Category:Non-free_image_copyright_tags), making sure they are only used on
one (or rarely two) pages? Any other usage (including galleries) could be eliminated. This does bring up another interesting problem: Are galleries on category pages (automatically generated) against the core principles? If so, __NOGALLERY__ might be needed on
some categories. --
Splarka (
rant)
07:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
As far as I know, double redirects do not show up on the Special:Whatlinkshere page. It's doing what it should as it shows the redirect. --
JLaTondre00:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it's the triple redirects that do not show up. Look at the Whatlinkshere for
Seljuk Turks and for
Seljuq dynasty; the one for the redirect has more than 500 items, while the one for the article has less than that. It's not that it isn't showing for being a double redirect; a number of other articles aren't showing too (
Eshrefoglu, for instance; in fact, the whole second page of Whatlinkshere results for the redirect). I've purged the redirect; it's possible that, when the
job queue gets to it, the problem fixes itself. --
cesarb01:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
In fact, the article I just mentioned gets its link from a template; I've purged the template too, just in case. --
cesarb01:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, double redirects definitely show up. I did null edits on three templates that linked to
Seljuk Turks, but that didn't fix it, either. Why is the job queue so long right now?
Ardric4702:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Don't know which license to use for image
Needing a good portrait of the subject of a Wikipedia article, I e-mailed him personally with the request. He responded with a few high quality jpegs to use for this purpose. Now, I don't know which license tag to use for the images. Any help please? Thanks
si»abhorreo»T02:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
He needs to state explicitly that he releases them under a free for any purpose license, including the creation of derivative works and commercial uses without further permission. Typically, on Wikipedia, this is the
Gnu Free Documentation License, but images are permitted under the
Creative Commons licenses as long as they are the kind that allow commercial use and derivation. This particular case is confused somewhat if you specifically asked for use on Wikipedia and he granted that without having been told about the terms required or licensing them himself. Probably, it is not good enough in that case, and another email exchanged would be better.
Once you have such an email, upload the images using whichever tag is appropriate to the free license used (probably simply {{GFDL}} or {{cc-by-sa}}, {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} etc), with an additional note regarding sourcing and licensing on the image page. Also, email a copy of his emails to the Foundation at permissions dot wikimedia dot org so that the Foundation has a piece of notpaper to wave around if it comes to it.
Unless the copyright owner has made this kind of copyright statement, then such a tag should not be used. The best that could be claimed is
fair use in a relevant article. -
Splash -
tk03:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, he is a big enough star that all this talk of licensing and him forfeiting his rights and giving it away for free etc may very well scare him off. I know that if I was in his position and didn't know about this stuff, I would probably get nervous about doing something like this, worrying that it's something I might regret later. Is there any way for him to give (even more) explicit xpermission for it to be used on Wikipedia, which will let me use a tag like this
Template:WithPermission? Thanks
si»abhorreo»T15:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
No, I'm afraid we no longer accept images with permission to use only on Wikipedia, because it limits reuse. You could try asking him to release just one of the images under a free license, or just low-resolution versions of the images. If this doesn't work, I'm afraid you can't upload them.
Deco18:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
This was bumped off of Village pump (technical) a while ago, but the matter has come back up, so I copy/pasted the above section from an old version of the page
OK, I got an e-mail in which the owner of the image explicitly releases it under a free license. When I tried to forward our e-mail exchange to "Foundation at permissions dot wikimedia dot org", however, I got an address does not exist error. Did I get the address wrong or has it changed or what?
si»abhorreo»T23:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia site only shows alt text only (no images) - Firefox 1.5.0.6
I have no problem on other sites, or when using IE on Wikipedia, but Firefox 1.5.0.6 (my standard/pref'd browser) gives me only alt text, even when I set a user-agent spoofer to fake being IE.
If I click thru on alt text and then click on an image file's name, I can get to the image and display it, without changing user agent or anything. But nothing by alt txt in-line or elsewhere on the topic-article pages themselves.
Make sure you don't have images disabled. Try hitting F9 and reloading, or checking privacy settings. --
NE205:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
> GOT IT. Thanks. Developer's toolbar by chrispederick defaults to block offsite img's.
THANKS.
IT'S NOT SO SIMPLE. It has been happening with MOZILLA 1.7.11 too, with images enabled. The trouble is, on first visiting an article, images are OK. The second time (ie., after viewing the article's history) all images just vanish. This began to happen only this week. --
AVM04:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)